No. 1, Orig., Wisconsin v. Illinois (1922)

File Date	Document Title
7/14/1922	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
1/25/1926	Petition or Motion Of the State of Kentucky, By Frank E. Daugherty, Its Attorney General, For Leave To Intervene And Become a Party Defendant, To File A Motion To Dismiss The Amended Bill and To Otherwise Participate In The Defense
5/31/1950	Petition of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The United States Supreme Court For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Motion of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To Dismiss The Petition Of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Petition of The State of Illinois and The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
11/9/1956	Petition for Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/21/1956	Reply to Petition
11/24/1956	Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoTo the Supreme Court of the United States For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, and Answer to Petition of State of Illinois For Modification of Paragraph 3 of Said Decree
11/26/1956	Petition of the State of Iowa, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois, For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/26/1956	Petition of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, An Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Answer of The State of New York, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Dismissal of the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly the Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, Or, In the Alternative, For Appointment of and Reference to a Special Master
1/25/1926	Petition or Motion By the State of Louisiana, By Percy Saint, Its Attorney General, For Leave To Intervene And Become A Party Defendant, To File A Motion To Dismiss The Amended Bill And To Otherwise Participate In The Defense
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of Illinois That Its Petition for Temporary Modification of Decree Be Decided Separately From the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree
12/6/1956	Answer of State of Missouri to Petition of State of Illinois and to Motion of Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Ohio, Complainant, To The Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Minnesota, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Arkansas, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Louisiana, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/8/1956	Reply of the State of Mississippi, an Intervening Defendant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
1/25/1926	Petition Or Motion Of The State of Tennessee, By Frank M. Thompson Its Attorney General, For Leave To Intervene And Become A Party Defendant, T File A Motion To Dismiss The Amended Bill And To Otherwise Participate In The Defense
12/13/1956	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
12/13/1956	Motion of The State of Michigan, Complainant, For Dismissal of The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, Or in The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/13/1956	Answer of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 Of Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1957	Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Motion of The States of Wisconsin and Ohio To Dismiss The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension of The Order of December 17, 1956
1/22/1957	Reply of The State of New York To Motion of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957 Of The Decree Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
1/23/1957	Answer of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago) To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion: Response of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Extension To Feb. 28, 1957, Of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/23/1957	Response of the State of Michigan, Complainant, to the Petition of the State of Illinois for Extension to Feb. 28, 1957, of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/24/1957	Reply of The State of Mississippi, An Intervening Defendant To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For An Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/25/1926	Brief Of Illinois In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Amended Bill
12/20/1957	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Modification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, So As To Require The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, To Return To Lake Michigan The Water Taken There from As Domestic Pumpage, Or, In The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/23/1957	Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief. Brief In Support Thereof
2/6/1958	Brief in Opposition To The Motion of The State of New York And To The Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New York
2/19/1958	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States As Amicus Curiae
11/3/1958	Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief
11/19/1958	Brief In Support of Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
12/31/1958	Motion For Leave To File And Brief of The Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry As Amicus Curiae In Opposition To Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
1/19/1959	Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of The Complainant's For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And For Further Relief
1/31/1959	Objections by the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York, Complainants, and Motion to Strike from the Files a Certain "Motion for Leave to File and Brief of the Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Amended Application of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York for a Reopening and Amendment of the Decree of April 21, 1930 and for the Granting of Further Relief - Brief In Support Thereof
2/12/1959	Motion To Allow And Fix Time For Filing of Reply Brief By Complainants To Defendants' Brief
1/25/1926	Statement and Brief of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Amended Bill of Complaint
2/14/1959	Opposition To Complainants' Motion For Extension Of Time To File Reply Brief Until March 31, 1959
4/14/1959	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Exceptions, Objections and Comments of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York to the Memorandum Filed on April 14, 1959 by Honorable J. Lee Rankin, Solicitor General, for the United States as Amicus Curiae, on the Amended Application of the Above Complainants
4/30/1959	Reply of Defendants To The Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Reply Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Answer to Defendants' Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of the Complainant States; and Motion To Amend And Enlarge Complainants' Prayer For Relief In Complainants' Amended Application
5/6/1959	On Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment of The Decree of April 21, 1930, and The Granting of Further Relief
5/11/1959	Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for The United States as Amicus Curiae
5/11/1959	Appendix B referred to in Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/18/1959	Motion of The United States of America For Leave To Intervene Memorandum In Support Thereof, And Petitions of Intervention
1/11/1960	Suggestion of Change In Name of Defendant Sanitary District of Chicago
2/15/1926	Brief In Support of Motion To Dismiss Filed On Behalf of the States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Louisiana, Intervening Defendants
1/11/1960	Consent of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To Intervention By The United States of America
2/10/1960	Consent of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan And New York To Intervention By The United States of America
4/8/1960	Answer of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Petition of Intervention of The United States of America
1/9/1967	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
5/15/1967	Joint Motion and Proposed Decree
8/28/1969	Answer of the Defendants State of Illinois And Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Amended Application of Complainants For A Reopening Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
8/4/1978	Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, Petition For Modification of Decree, And Proposed Decree
8/10/1978	Technical Appendix To Petition For Modification of Decree
10/10/1978	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
11/24/1978	Amended Proposed Decree
2/23/1926	Notice and Motion Brief and Argument For The States of Indiana and Michigan As Amici Curiae
12/1/1978	Response of The State of Michigan Interposing No Objection To Petition By The State of Illinois For Modification of The Decree of June 12, 1967
12/1/1978	Memorandum For The United States
12/4/1978	Response of The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago To State of Illinois' Petition For Modification of Decree
1/4/1979	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
1/30/1979	Reply of The State of Illinois To Responses To Motion For Leave To File Petition And Petition For Modification of Decree
8/9/1979	Second Amended Proposed Decree
8/11/1980	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
3/24/1989	[Letter Re: Wisconsin, et al. v. Illinois, et al., 388 U.S. 426 (1967), as modified 449 U.S. 48 (1980)]
5/20/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Annual Report Water Years 1990-92
10/11/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1993 Annual Report
3/8/1926	Brief and Argument Filed By the State of New York by Permission of this Court as Amicus Curiae
12/21/2009	Motion for Preliminary Injunction
12/21/2009	Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree, Petition, And Brief And Appendix In Support of Motion
12/23/2009	Memorandum of the State of Ohio
12/28/2009	State of Minnesota's Brief In Support Of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
12/31/2009	Brief of Amicus Curiae Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Ontario In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Of Greater Chicago's Response To Motion For Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Memorandum For The United States in Opposition
1/12/2010	Brief of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion To Reopen
2/19/2010	Brief of Plaintiffs States of New York, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in Support of Motion to Reopen and Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
2/19/2010	Amicus Brief of Alliance For The Great Lakes, National Wildlife Federation, and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. in Support of Complainant States and Original Jurisdiction
3/8/1926	Reply Brief On The Question of Jurisdiction In Support of Motion To Dismiss Filed On Behalf of The States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee and Louisiana, Intervening Defendants
2/19/2010	Brief of The State of Indiana As Amicus Curiae In Support of The Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
2/19/2010	Amicus Curiae Brief of Michigan Shoreline Caucus Supporting Motion To Reopen And Renewed Motion For Preliminary Injunction
3/18/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago's Brief in Opposition To Petition To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
3/22/2010	Brief In Opposition
3/22/2010	Brief for the United States In Opposition
4/1/2010	Reply Brief
N/A	[Untitled]
N/A	Photographic Survey of Water Level Conditions Around Lakes Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario July 10, 1929 to Aug. 2, 1929
N/A	[Memorandum Subject: Lake Michigan Diversion Annual Reports]
N/A	Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Years 1981 & 1982
3/8/1926	Reply Brief of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, Upon The Motion To Dismiss The Amended Bill of Complaint
N/A	1985 Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion (Including State of Illinois Water Year 1983 Accounting Report)
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1986 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1987 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1988 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1997 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1998 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1999 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 2000 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1994 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1995 Annual Report
7/14/1922	Bill of Complaint
3/8/1926	Reply Brief of Illinois
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1996 Annual Report
N/A	Abstract of Principal Points in Special Master's Report in Chicago Diversion Case
N/A	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
N/A	Argument in Support of Exceptions Filed By the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To the Report of Special Master Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941
5/22/1926	Motion for Appointment of Commissioner, With Notice, and Proposed Order
5/24/1926	Answer of Intervening Defendant's, The States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee and Louisiana, To The Amended Bill of Complaint
5/31/1926	Official Newspapers Releases Covering Correspondence between The Department of State and The British Embassy In Regard To the Subject Matter of The Within Suit
6/1/1926	Answer of Illinois To Amended Bill of Complaint
11/1/1926	Petition or Motion of the State of Mississippi By Its Attorney General For Leave To Intervene And Become A Party Defendant And Adopt The Answer Herefore Filed By The Above Named Intervening Defendants
11/1/1926	Petition Or Motion Of The State of Arkansas By William B. Applegate, Its Attorney General, For Leave To Intervene And Become A Party Defendant And Adopt The Answer Heretofore Filed By The Above Named Intervening Defendants
11/23/1927	Report of the Special Master
11/23/1927	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received by the Special Master
12/27/1927	Exceptions to The Report of the Special Master Take By The State of Michigan, Complainant
10/3/1922	Joint and Several Answer of Defendants, The State of Illinois, and The Sanitary District of Chicago To The Bill of Complaint Filed Herein
1/3/1928	Complainant's Exceptions To Report of The Special Master
1/24/1928	Joint Abstract of Record
2/10/1928	Brief for the State of Michigan, Complainant, In Support of Exceptions To Report of Special Master
2/13/1928	Brief for Complainants in No. 7 Original
2/27/1928	Brief of Behalf of Intervening Defendants, Mississippi River States
2/28/1928	Brief for Defendants, Illinois and the Sanitary District of Chicago
4/23/1928	Appendix to Defendant's Briefs
4/15/1929	Brief of the Complainant States In Opposition To The Motion Filed By the City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene as Defendant And To File Intervening Petition
4/15/1929	Answering Affidavit on Behalf of the State of New York to the Motion of City of Chicago to Intervene as Defendant
4/15/1929	Notice, Motion For Leave To Present Petition For Leave To Intervene As Defendant And Intervention Petition
2/27/1925	Brief on Behalf of Complainants In Opposition To Motion To Dismiss
4/16/1929	Suggestions By The City of Chicago In Reply To Brief And Affidavit In Opposition To The Motion And Petition Of The City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene As Co-Defendant
12/17/1929	Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference
12/17/1929	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received By The Special Master on Re-Reference
1/24/1930	Notice, Motion and Suggestions By Defendants For Reassignment of the Above Causes For Hearing From The Head of the Call For February 24, 1930, To The Head of The Call For April 7, 1930
2/3/1930	Complainants Exceptions To The Report Of The Special Master On Re-Reference
2/3/1930	Exceptions and Objections of Defendants The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The "Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference" Filed December 17, 1929
2/20/1930	Joint Abstract of Record for Hearing Upon Exceptions To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief for Complainants in No. 7 and 11 Original , In Support of Complainant's Exception And In Opposition To Defendant's Exceptions To Masters' Report On Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief of Defendants Upon The Hearing of the Exceptions Filed By All Parties To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
6/30/1930	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1930, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/5/1925	Motion to Amend Bill of Complaint
1/2/1931	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1932	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1932, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/3/1932	Application of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan For The Appointment of An Officer, Or Officers, Of The Court to Carry Out The Decree Made And Entered In the Above-Entitled Causes On April 21, 1930 With Supporting Brief
11/7/1932	Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
12/3/1932	Brief In Opposition To Complainants' Motion of October 3, 1932
12/5/1932	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan After Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
1/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of the Chicago of January 1, 1933, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1933	Statement of Objections And Motion To Dismiss The Application of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi And Arkansas For A Modification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And An Enlargement Of The Pending Reference Filed By Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan
1/12/1933	Application of States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, Intervening Defendants, for Modification of Decree Under the Provisions of Paragraphs 6 and 7 Thereof and for Enlargement of Pending Reference to Report in Connection with Such Application
3/13/1933	Report of the Special Master Edward F. McClennan
1/4/1926	Answer of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, To The Amended Bill of Complaint
4/10/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan Upon The Hearing on The Report of Honorable Edward F. McLennan, On The Re-Reference of December 19, 1932
4/10/1933	Brief On Behalf of The State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/10/1933	Brief of The Sanitary District of Chicago On Legal Questions Presented By Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/10/1933	Brief of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, On Facts Presented In The Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of The States of Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan
4/17/1933	Reply Brief on Behalf of the State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of the Sanitary District of Chicago By Complainants On Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
5/22/1933	Hearing on the Report of the Special Master, Edward F. McClennen, under order entered December 19, 1932 [Slip Opinion]
6/14/1933	Petition for Rehearing
7/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District pf Chicago of July 1, 1933, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/4/1926	Demurrer of the State of Illinois To The Amended Bill of Complaint
7/12/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Statement of The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Brief of Illinois Submitted In Reply To Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan Presented In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By Illinois
1/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
5/23/1934	Supplemental Report of Defendants Relative To Modification In Sequence of Construction Program Procedure
7/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930;
12/31/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago July 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930.
12/30/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1936	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/25/1926	Motion of the States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee and Louisiana, To Dismiss the Amended Bill of Complaint
1/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1937. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1937, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1938, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1 , 1938, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/9/1939	Final Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago, January 1, 1939, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York As Respondents To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Brief In Support of Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York as Respondents, To Rule To Show Cause Issues on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/23/1940	Reply Brief and Argument of the State of Illinois, To the Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Their Return To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of The Decree of April 21, 1930;
4/3/1940	Order
4/3/1940	Per Curiam
1/25/1926	Petition or Motion of the State of Missouri, By North T. Gentry Its Attorney General, For Leave To Intervene and become a Party Defendant, To File A Motion To Dismiss The Amended Bill and To Otherwise Participate In the Defense
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/25/1940	Order
4/2/1941	Report of the Special Master
4/14/1941	Exceptions of the State of Illinois To The Report of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann
4/14/1941	Exceptions By the State of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To The Report of the Special Master
4/28/1941	Brief And Argument Of The State of Illinois In Support of Exceptions Heretofore Made By It To The Report Of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume I Testimony
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume II Exhibits
4/30/1941	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Opposition To Illinois' Exceptions To The Report of The Special Master Dated March 31, 1941

No. 2, Orig., Michigan v. Illinois (1926)

File Date	Document Title
3/8/1926	Bill of Complaint
5/22/1926	Order for Leave to Defendants to Answer and For Consolidation for the Purpose of Taking Proofs and Hearing with Original in Equity Number 16, October Term, 1925, Entitled "State of Wisconsin:, et al., vs. State of Illinois et al."
5/22/1926	Notice and Motion for Consolidation with No. 16 in Equity, Wisconsin, et al., vs. Illinois, et al., to Take Proofs and for Hearing
6/1/1926	Joint and Several Answer of Defendants, The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago, To The Bill of Complaint
6/1/1926	Notice of Motion For Leave to File Instanter The Joint and Several Answer of the Defendants and To Renew the Motion For Consolidation With No. 16 In Equity, Wisconsin, et al., vs. Illinois, et al., To Take Proofs For Hearing
9/30/1926	Motion To Amend Bill of Complaint
10/7/1926	Memorandum of the Respondents In Opposition To The Pending Motion To Amend Bill of Complaint and To Admit The State of New York as a Co-Complainant
10/8/1926	Memorandum In Support of Motion to Join new York As Party Complainant and Amend Bill of Complaint
11/23/1927	Report of the Special Master
11/23/1927	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received by the Special Master
12/27/1927	Exceptions to The Report of the Special Master Take By The State of Michigan, Complainant
1/24/1928	Joint Abstract of Record
2/10/1928	Brief for the State of Michigan, Complainant, In Support of Exceptions To Report of Special Master
2/27/1928	Brief of Behalf of Intervening Defendants, Mississippi River States
2/28/1928	Brief for Defendants, Illinois and the Sanitary District of Chicago
4/23/1928	Appendix to Defendant's Briefs
4/15/1929	Brief of the Complainant States In Opposition To The Motion Filed By the City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene as Defendant And To File Intervening Petition
4/15/1929	Answering Affidavit on Behalf of the State of New York to the Motion of City of Chicago to Intervene as Defendant
4/15/1929	Notice, Motion For Leave To Present Petition For Leave To Intervene As Defendant And Intervention Petition
4/16/1929	Suggestions By The City of Chicago In Reply To Brief And Affidavit In Opposition To The Motion And Petition Of The City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene As Co-Defendant
12/17/1929	Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference
12/17/1929	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received By The Special Master on Re-Reference
1/24/1930	Notice, Motion and Suggestions By Defendants For Reassignment of the Above Causes For Hearing From The Head of the Call For February 24, 1930, To The Head of The Call For April 7, 1930
2/3/1930	Complainants Exceptions To The Report Of The Special Master On Re-Reference
2/3/1930	Exceptions and Objections of Defendants The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The "Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference" Filed December 17, 1929
2/20/1930	Joint Abstract of Record for Hearing Upon Exceptions To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief for Complainants in No. 7 and 11 Original , In Support of Complainant's Exception And In Opposition To Defendant's Exceptions To Masters' Report On Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief of Defendants Upon The Hearing of the Exceptions Filed By All Parties To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
6/30/1930	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1930, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/2/1931	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1932	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1932, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/3/1932	Application of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan For The Appointment of An Officer, Or Officers, Of The Court to Carry Out The Decree Made And Entered In the Above-Entitled Causes On April 21, 1930 With Supporting Brief
11/7/1932	Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
12/3/1932	Brief In Opposition To Complainants' Motion of October 3, 1932
12/5/1932	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan After Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
1/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of the Chicago of January 1, 1933, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1933	Statement of Objections And Motion To Dismiss The Application of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi And Arkansas For A Modification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And An Enlargement Of The Pending Reference Filed By Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan
1/12/1933	Application of States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, Intervening Defendants, for Modification of Decree Under the Provisions of Paragraphs 6 and 7 Thereof and for Enlargement of Pending Reference to Report in Connection with Such Application
3/13/1933	Report of the Special Master Edward F. McClennan
4/10/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan Upon The Hearing on The Report of Honorable Edward F. McLennan, On The Re-Reference of December 19, 1932
4/10/1933	Brief On Behalf of The State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/10/1933	Brief of The Sanitary District of Chicago On Legal Questions Presented By Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/10/1933	Brief of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, On Facts Presented In The Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of The States of Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan
4/17/1933	Reply Brief on Behalf of the State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of the Sanitary District of Chicago By Complainants On Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
5/22/1933	Hearing on the Report of the Special Master, Edward F. McClennen, under order entered December 19, 1932 [Slip Opinion]
6/14/1933	Petition for Rehearing
7/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District pf Chicago of July 1, 1933, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/12/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Statement of The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Brief of Illinois Submitted In Reply To Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan Presented In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By Illinois
1/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
5/23/1934	Supplemental Report of Defendants Relative To Modification In Sequence of Construction Program Procedure
7/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930;
12/31/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago July 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930.
12/30/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1936	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1937. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1937, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1938, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1 , 1938, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
10/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1 , 1938, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/9/1939	Final Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago, January 1, 1939, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York As Respondents To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Brief In Support of Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York as Respondents, To Rule To Show Cause Issues on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/23/1940	Reply Brief and Argument of the State of Illinois, To the Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Their Return To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of The Decree of April 21, 1930;
4/3/1940	Order
4/3/1940	Per Curiam
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/25/1940	Order
4/2/1941	Report of the Special Master
4/14/1941	Exceptions of the State of Illinois To The Report of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann
4/14/1941	Exceptions By the State of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To The Report of the Special Master
4/28/1941	Brief And Argument Of The State of Illinois In Support of Exceptions Heretofore Made By It To The Report Of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume I Testimony
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume II Exhibits
4/30/1941	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Opposition To Illinois' Exceptions To The Report of The Special Master Dated March 31, 1941
5/31/1950	Petition of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The United States Supreme Court For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Motion of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To Dismiss The Petition Of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Petition of The State of Illinois and The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
11/9/1956	Petition for Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/21/1956	Reply to Petition
11/24/1956	Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoTo the Supreme Court of the United States For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, and Answer to Petition of State of Illinois For Modification of Paragraph 3 of Said Decree
11/26/1956	Petition of the State of Iowa, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois, For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/26/1956	Petition of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, An Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Answer of The State of New York, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Dismissal of the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly the Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, Or, In the Alternative, For Appointment of and Reference to a Special Master
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of Illinois That Its Petition for Temporary Modification of Decree Be Decided Separately From the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree
12/6/1956	Answer of State of Missouri to Petition of State of Illinois and to Motion of Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Ohio, Complainant, To The Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Minnesota, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Arkansas, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Louisiana, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/8/1956	Reply of the State of Mississippi, an Intervening Defendant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/13/1956	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
12/13/1956	Motion of The State of Michigan, Complainant, For Dismissal of The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, Or in The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/13/1956	Answer of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 Of Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1957	Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Motion of The States of Wisconsin and Ohio To Dismiss The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension of The Order of December 17, 1956
1/22/1957	Reply of The State of New York To Motion of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957 Of The Decree Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
1/23/1957	Answer of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago) To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion: Response of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Extension To Feb. 28, 1957, Of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/23/1957	Response of the State of Michigan, Complainant, to the Petition of the State of Illinois for Extension to Feb. 28, 1957, of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/24/1957	Reply of The State of Mississippi, An Intervening Defendant To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For An Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
12/20/1957	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Modification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, So As To Require The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, To Return To Lake Michigan The Water Taken There from As Domestic Pumpage, Or, In The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/23/1957	Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief. Brief In Support Thereof
2/6/1958	Brief in Opposition To The Motion of The State of New York And To The Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New York
2/19/1958	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States As Amicus Curiae
11/3/1958	Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief
11/19/1958	Brief In Support of Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
12/31/1958	Motion For Leave To File And Brief of The Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry As Amicus Curiae In Opposition To Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
1/19/1959	Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of The Complainant's For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And For Further Relief
1/31/1959	Objections by the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York, Complainants, and Motion to Strike from the Files a Certain "Motion for Leave to File and Brief of the Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Amended Application of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York for a Reopening and Amendment of the Decree of April 21, 1930 and for the Granting of Further Relief - Brief In Support Thereof
2/12/1959	Motion To Allow And Fix Time For Filing of Reply Brief By Complainants To Defendants' Brief
2/14/1959	Opposition To Complainants' Motion For Extension Of Time To File Reply Brief Until March 31, 1959
4/14/1959	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Exceptions, Objections and Comments of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York to the Memorandum Filed on April 14, 1959 by Honorable J. Lee Rankin, Solicitor General, for the United States as Amicus Curiae, on the Amended Application of the Above Complainants
4/30/1959	Reply of Defendants To The Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Reply Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Answer to Defendants' Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of the Complainant States; and Motion To Amend And Enlarge Complainants' Prayer For Relief In Complainants' Amended Application
5/6/1959	On Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment of The Decree of April 21, 1930, and The Granting of Further Relief
5/11/1959	Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for The United States as Amicus Curiae
5/11/1959	Appendix B referred to in Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/18/1959	Motion of The United States of America For Leave To Intervene Memorandum In Support Thereof, And Petitions of Intervention
1/11/1960	Suggestion of Change In Name of Defendant Sanitary District of Chicago
1/11/1960	Consent of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To Intervention By The United States of America
2/10/1960	Consent of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan And New York To Intervention By The United States of America
4/8/1960	Answer of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Petition of Intervention of The United States of America
1/9/1967	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
5/15/1967	Joint Motion and Proposed Decree
8/28/1969	Answer of the Defendants State of Illinois And Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Amended Application of Complainants For A Reopening Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
8/4/1978	Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, Petition For Modification of Decree, And Proposed Decree
8/10/1978	Technical Appendix To Petition For Modification of Decree
10/10/1978	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
11/24/1978	Amended Proposed Decree
12/1/1978	Response of The State of Michigan Interposing No Objection To Petition By The State of Illinois For Modification of The Decree of June 12, 1967
12/1/1978	Memorandum For The United States
12/4/1978	Response of The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago To State of Illinois' Petition For Modification of Decree
1/4/1979	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
1/30/1979	Reply of The State of Illinois To Responses To Motion For Leave To File Petition And Petition For Modification of Decree
8/9/1979	Second Amended Proposed Decree
8/11/1980	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
3/24/1989	[Letter Re: Wisconsin, et al. v. Illinois, et al., 388 U.S. 426 (1967), as modified 449 U.S. 48 (1980)]
5/20/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Annual Report Water Years 1990-92
10/11/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1993 Annual Report
12/21/2009	Motion for Preliminary Injunction
12/21/2009	Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree, Petition, And Brief And Appendix In Support of Motion
12/23/2009	Memorandum of the State of Ohio
12/28/2009	State of Minnesota's Brief In Support Of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
12/31/2009	Brief of Amicus Curiae Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Ontario In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Of Greater Chicago's Response To Motion For Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Memorandum For The United States in Opposition
1/12/2010	Brief of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion To Reopen
2/19/2010	Brief of Plaintiffs States of New York, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in Support of Motion to Reopen and Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
2/19/2010	Amicus Brief of Alliance For The Great Lakes, National Wildlife Federation, and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. in Support of Complainant States and Original Jurisdiction
2/19/2010	Brief of The State of Indiana As Amicus Curiae In Support of The Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
2/19/2010	Amicus Curiae Brief of Michigan Shoreline Caucus Supporting Motion To Reopen And Renewed Motion For Preliminary Injunction
3/18/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago's Brief in Opposition To Petition To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
3/22/2010	Brief In Opposition
3/22/2010	Brief for the United States In Opposition
4/1/2010	Reply Brief
N/A	[Untitled]
N/A	[Untitled]
N/A	Photographic Survey of Water Level Conditions Around Lakes Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario July 10, 1929 to Aug. 2, 1929
N/A	[Memorandum Subject: Lake Michigan Diversion Annual Reports]
N/A	Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Years 1981 & 1982
N/A	1985 Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion (Including State of Illinois Water Year 1983 Accounting Report)
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1986 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1987 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1988 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1997 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1998 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1999 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 2000 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1994 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1995 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1996 Annual Report
N/A	Abstract of Principal Points in Special Master's Report in Chicago Diversion Case
N/A	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
N/A	Argument in Support of Exceptions Filed By the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To the Report of Special Master Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941

No. 3, Orig., New York v. Illinois (1926)

File Date	Document Title
9/30/1926	Motion To Amend Bill of Complaint
10/8/1926	Memorandum In Support of Motion to Join New York As Party Complainant and Amend Bill of Complaint
10/22/1926	Bill of Complaint
10/22/1926	Motion For Order or Direction That Parties May Participate In Trial of Related Suit of State of Wisconsin Et Al., v. State of Illinois And Sanitary District of Chicago
10/22/1926	Memorandum of Defendants in Opposition to Motion of Complainant for Leave to Participate in Wisconsin Suit
4/6/1927	Motion For Order, Rule Or Direction Requiring The Defendant's To Answer The Bill of Complaint Herein
4/11/1927	Suggestions of Defendants In Response To Motion Of Complaint For Order On Defendant's To Answer
4/11/1927	Motion of Defendants To Strike Paragraph III Of The Bill of Complaint
11/23/1927	Report of the Special Master
11/23/1927	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received by the Special Master
12/27/1927	Exceptions to The Report of the Special Master Take By The State of Michigan, Complainant
1/3/1928	Exceptions To Report of Special Master
1/24/1928	Joint Abstract of Record
2/10/1928	Brief for the State of Michigan, Complainant, In Support of Exceptions To Report of Special Master
2/13/1928	Brief on Behalf of the State of New York in Support of its Exceptions Taken to the Conclusions of Law Contained in the Report of Hon. Charles E. Hughes, Special Master
2/27/1928	Brief of Behalf of Intervening Defendants, Mississippi River States
2/28/1928	Brief for Defendants, Illinois and the Sanitary District of Chicago
4/23/1928	Appendix to Defendant's Briefs
4/15/1929	Brief of the Complainant States In Opposition To The Motion Filed By the City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene as Defendant And To File Intervening Petition
4/15/1929	Answering Affidavit on Behalf of the State of New York to the Motion of City of Chicago to Intervene as Defendant
4/15/1929	Notice, Motion For Leave To Present Petition For Leave To Intervene As Defendant And Intervention Petition
4/16/1929	Suggestions By The City of Chicago In Reply To Brief And Affidavit In Opposition To The Motion And Petition Of The City of Chicago For Leave To Intervene As Co-Defendant
12/17/1929	Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference
12/17/1929	Report of Testimony and Exhibits Received By The Special Master on Re-Reference
1/24/1930	Notice, Motion and Suggestions By Defendants For Reassignment of the Above Causes For Hearing From The Head of the Call For February 24, 1930, To The Head of The Call For April 7, 1930
2/3/1930	Complainants Exceptions To The Report Of The Special Master On Re-Reference
2/3/1930	Exceptions and Objections of Defendants The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The "Report of the Special Master on Re-Reference" Filed December 17, 1929
2/20/1930	Joint Abstract of Record for Hearing Upon Exceptions To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
2/24/1930	Complainant's Substitute Exceptions To Report of The Special Master on Re-Reference
3/11/1930	Brief for Complainant In Support of Complainant's Substitute Exceptions, And In Opposition To Defendant's Exceptions To The Master's Report on Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief for Complainants in No. 7 and 11 Original , In Support of Complainant's Exception And In Opposition To Defendant's Exceptions To Masters' Report On Re-Reference
3/12/1930	Brief of Defendants Upon The Hearing of the Exceptions Filed By All Parties To the Special Master's Report on Re-Reference
6/30/1930	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1930, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/2/1931	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1932	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1932, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/3/1932	Application of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan For The Appointment of An Officer, Or Officers, Of The Court to Carry Out The Decree Made And Entered In the Above-Entitled Causes On April 21, 1930 With Supporting Brief
11/7/1932	Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
12/3/1932	Brief In Opposition To Complainants' Motion of October 3, 1932
12/5/1932	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan After Return of the Sanitary District of Chicago And The State of Illinois To The Rule To Show Cause Entered Herein On October 10, 1932
1/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of the Chicago of January 1, 1933, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1933	Statement of Objections And Motion To Dismiss The Application of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi And Arkansas For A Modification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And An Enlargement Of The Pending Reference Filed By Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan
1/12/1933	Application of States of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas, Intervening Defendants, for Modification of Decree Under the Provisions of Paragraphs 6 and 7 Thereof and for Enlargement of Pending Reference to Report in Connection with Such Application
3/13/1933	Report of the Special Master Edward F. McClennan
4/10/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan Upon The Hearing on The Report of Honorable Edward F. McLennan, On The Re-Reference of December 19, 1932
4/10/1933	Brief On Behalf of The State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/10/1933	Brief of The Sanitary District of Chicago On Legal Questions Presented By Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/10/1933	Brief of Defendant, The Sanitary District of Chicago, On Facts Presented In The Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of The States of Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan
4/17/1933	Reply Brief on Behalf of the State of Illinois In Opposition To Report of Special Master McClennen
4/17/1933	Reply Brief of the Sanitary District of Chicago By Complainants On Report of Edward F. McClennen, Special Master
5/22/1933	Hearing on the Report of the Special Master, Edward F. McClennen, under order entered December 19, 1932 [Slip Opinion]
6/14/1933	Petition for Rehearing
7/3/1933	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District pf Chicago of July 1, 1933, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/12/1933	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio And Michigan In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Statement of The State of Illinois
9/30/1933	Brief of Illinois Submitted In Reply To Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Michigan Presented In Opposition To Petition For Rehearing Filed By Illinois
1/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
5/23/1934	Supplemental Report of Defendants Relative To Modification In Sequence of Construction Program Procedure
7/2/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1934, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930;
12/31/1934	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago July 1, 1935. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930.
12/30/1935	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
7/2/1936	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1936. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1937. Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/11/1937	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1937, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
1/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of January 1, 1938, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
10/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1 , 1938, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
10/10/1938	Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1 , 1938, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
1/9/1939	Final Semi-Annual Report of the Sanitary District of Chicago, January 1, 1939, Made Pursuant to Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York As Respondents To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/4/1940	Brief In Support of Return of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York as Respondents, To Rule To Show Cause Issues on Application of the State of Illinois, As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
3/23/1940	Reply Brief and Argument of the State of Illinois, To the Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Their Return To Rule To Show Cause Issued on Application of the State of Illinois As Petitioner, For A Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of The Decree of April 21, 1930;
4/3/1940	Order
4/3/1940	Per Curiam
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
4/11/1940	Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/25/1940	Order
4/2/1941	Report of the Special Master
4/14/1941	Exceptions of the State of Illinois To The Report of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann
4/14/1941	Exceptions By the State of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To The Report of the Special Master
4/28/1941	Brief And Argument Of The State of Illinois In Support of Exceptions Heretofore Made By It To The Report Of The Special Master, Monte M. Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume I Testimony
4/30/1941	Joint Abstract of Record Volume II Exhibits
4/30/1941	Brief of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Opposition To Illinois' Exceptions To The Report of The Special Master Dated March 31, 1941
5/31/1950	Petition of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago To The United States Supreme Court For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Motion of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To Dismiss The Petition Of The State of Illinois And The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
9/18/1950	Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Petition of The State of Illinois and The Sanitary District of Chicago For An Interpretation And Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
11/9/1956	Petition for Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/21/1956	Reply to Petition
11/24/1956	Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoTo the Supreme Court of the United States For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, and Answer to Petition of State of Illinois For Modification of Paragraph 3 of Said Decree
11/26/1956	Petition of the State of Iowa, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois, For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
11/26/1956	Petition of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, An Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Answer of The State of New York, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Dismissal of the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly the Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, Or, In the Alternative, For Appointment of and Reference to a Special Master
12/5/1956	Motion of the State of Illinois That Its Petition for Temporary Modification of Decree Be Decided Separately From the Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree
12/6/1956	Answer of State of Missouri to Petition of State of Illinois and to Motion of Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago For Clarification of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Motion of the State of Wisconsin to Dismiss the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Ohio, Complainant, To The Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Minnesota, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Arkansas, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Petition of the State of Louisiana, Intervening Defendant, In Support of the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/7/1956	Reply of the State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, To the Petition of the State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of Decree of April 21, 1930
12/8/1956	Reply of the State of Mississippi, an Intervening Defendant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 of the Decree of April 21, 1930
12/13/1956	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
12/13/1956	Motion of The State of Michigan, Complainant, For Dismissal of The Motion of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, For Clarification of The Decree of April 21, 1930, Or in The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/13/1956	Answer of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Temporary Modification of Paragraph 3 Of Decree of April 21, 1930
1/12/1957	Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Motion of The States of Wisconsin and Ohio To Dismiss The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension of The Order of December 17, 1956
1/22/1957	Reply of The State of New York To Motion of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957 Of The Decree Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/22/1957	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States as Amicus Curiae
1/23/1957	Answer of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago) To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion: Response of The State of Michigan, Complainant, To The Petition of The State of Illinois For Extension To Feb. 28, 1957, Of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/23/1957	Response of the State of Michigan, Complainant, to the Petition of the State of Illinois for Extension to Feb. 28, 1957, of Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
1/24/1957	Reply of The State of Mississippi, An Intervening Defendant To The Motion Of The State of Illinois For An Extension To February 28, 1957, Of The Order Authorizing Emergency Diversion
12/20/1957	Motion of the State of New York, Complainant, For Modification of the Decree of April 21, 1930, So As To Require The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (Formerly The Sanitary District of Chicago), Defendant, To Return To Lake Michigan The Water Taken There from As Domestic Pumpage, Or, In The Alternative, For Appointment Of And Reference To A Special Master
12/23/1957	Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief. Brief In Support Thereof
2/6/1958	Brief in Opposition To The Motion of The State of New York And To The Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New York
2/19/1958	Memorandum on Behalf of The United States As Amicus Curiae
11/3/1958	Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And The Granting of Further Relief
11/19/1958	Brief In Support of Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
12/31/1958	Motion For Leave To File And Brief of The Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry As Amicus Curiae In Opposition To Amended Application Of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930 And For The Granting of Further Relief
1/19/1959	Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of The Complainant's For A Reopening And Amendment Of The Decree of April 21, 1930, And For Further Relief
1/31/1959	Objections by the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York, Complainants, and Motion to Strike from the Files a Certain "Motion for Leave to File and Brief of the Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Amended Application of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York for a Reopening and Amendment of the Decree of April 21, 1930 and for the Granting of Further Relief - Brief In Support Thereof
2/12/1959	Motion To Allow And Fix Time For Filing of Reply Brief By Complainants To Defendants' Brief
2/14/1959	Opposition To Complainants' Motion For Extension Of Time To File Reply Brief Until March 31, 1959
4/14/1959	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Exceptions, Objections and Comments of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York to the Memorandum Filed on April 14, 1959 by Honorable J. Lee Rankin, Solicitor General, for the United States as Amicus Curiae, on the Amended Application of the Above Complainants
4/30/1959	Reply of Defendants To The Memorandum For The United States As Amicus Curiae
4/30/1959	Reply Brief of the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York In Answer to Defendants' Brief In Opposition To The Amended Application of the Complainant States; and Motion To Amend And Enlarge Complainants' Prayer For Relief In Complainants' Amended Application
5/6/1959	On Amended Application of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan And New York For A Reopening And Amendment of The Decree of April 21, 1930, and The Granting of Further Relief
5/11/1959	Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for The United States as Amicus Curiae
5/11/1959	Appendix B referred to in Answer of Complainants to Reply of Defendants to the Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
10/21/1959	Brief In Support of Motion By The State of New York For Leave To File A Supplemental And Amended Complainant
10/21/1959; 3/7/1960	Motion For Leave To File a Supplemental and Amended Complaint
12/18/1959	Motion of The United States of America For Leave To Intervene Memorandum In Support Thereof, And Petitions of Intervention
12/21/1959	Brief In Opposition To The Motion of The State of New York For Leave To File A Supplemental And Amended Complaint
1/4/1960	Reply Brief In Support of Motion By The State of New York For Leave To File A Supplemental And Amended Complaint
1/11/1960	Suggestion of Change In Name of Defendant Sanitary District of Chicago
1/11/1960	Consent of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To Intervention By The United States of America
2/10/1960	Consent of The States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan And New York To Intervention By The United States of America
2/23/1960	Report of Special Master Upon Motion of Complainant For Leave To File A Supplemental And Amended Complaint
4/8/1960	Answer of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Petition of Intervention of The United States of America
4/21/1960	Response of The United States of America To New York's Supplemental And Amended Complaint
4/21/1960	Answer of The State of Illinois And The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Supplemental And Amended Complaint
1/9/1967	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
5/15/1967	Joint Motion and Proposed Decree
8/28/1969	Answer of the Defendants State of Illinois And Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago To The Amended Application of Complainants For A Reopening Of The Decree of April 21, 1930
8/4/1978	Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, Petition For Modification of Decree, And Proposed Decree
8/10/1978	Technical Appendix To Petition For Modification of Decree
10/10/1978	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
11/24/1978	Amended Proposed Decree
12/1/1978	Response of The State of Michigan Interposing No Objection To Petition By The State of Illinois For Modification of The Decree of June 12, 1967
12/1/1978	Memorandum For The United States
12/4/1978	Response of The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago To State of Illinois' Petition For Modification of Decree
1/4/1979	Response To Motion For Leave To File Petition For Modification of Decree, And Response To Petition For Modification of Decree
1/30/1979	Reply of The State of Illinois To Responses To Motion For Leave To File Petition And Petition For Modification of Decree
8/9/1979	Second Amended Proposed Decree
8/11/1980	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
3/24/1989	[Letter Re: Wisconsin, et al. v. Illinois, et al., 388 U.S. 426 (1967), as modified 449 U.S. 48 (1980)]
5/20/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Annual Report Water Years 1990-92
10/11/1994	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1993 Annual Report
12/21/2009	Motion for Preliminary Injunction
12/21/2009	Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree, Petition, And Brief And Appendix In Support of Motion
12/23/2009	Memorandum of the State of Ohio
12/28/2009	State of Minnesota's Brief In Support Of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
12/31/2009	Brief of Amicus Curiae Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Ontario In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Of Greater Chicago's Response To Motion For Preliminary Injunction
1/5/2010	Memorandum For The United States in Opposition
1/12/2010	Brief of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania In Support of The State of Michigan's Motion To Reopen
2/19/2010	Brief of Plaintiffs States of New York, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in Support of Motion to Reopen and Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
2/19/2010	Amicus Brief of Alliance For The Great Lakes, National Wildlife Federation, and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. in Support of Complainant States and Original Jurisdiction
2/19/2010	Brief of The State of Indiana As Amicus Curiae In Support of The Motion To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
2/19/2010	Amicus Curiae Brief of Michigan Shoreline Caucus Supporting Motion To Reopen And Renewed Motion For Preliminary Injunction
3/18/2010	Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago's Brief in Opposition To Petition To Reopen And For A Supplemental Decree
3/22/2010	Brief In Opposition
3/22/2010	Brief for the United States In Opposition
4/1/2010	Reply Brief
N/A	[Untitled]
N/A	[Untitled]
N/A	Photographic Survey of Water Level Conditions Around Lakes Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario July 10, 1929 to Aug. 2, 1929
N/A	[Memorandum Subject: Lake Michigan Diversion Annual Reports]
N/A	Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Years 1981 & 1982
N/A	1985 Annual Report on Lake Michigan Diversion (Including State of Illinois Water Year 1983 Accounting Report)
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1986 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1987 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting 1988 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1997 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1998 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1999 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 2000 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1994 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1995 Annual Report
N/A	Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting Water Year 1996 Annual Report
N/A	Abstract of Principal Points in Special Master's Report in Chicago Diversion Case
N/A	Semi-Annual Report of The Sanitary District of Chicago of July 1, 1931, Made Pursuant To Decree of April 21, 1930
N/A	Argument in Support of Exceptions Filed By the States of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and New York To the Report of Special Master Lemann, Dated March 31, 1941

No. 4, Orig., Nebraska v. Wyoming (1934)

File Date	Document Title
10/15/1934	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Equity and Bill of Complaint in Equity
1/21/1935	Motion to Dismiss Bill of Complaint
1/26/1935	Argument of Motion to Dismiss
1/30/1935	Motion of Complainant to Set for Hearing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
3/2/1935	Brief of Complainant in Answer to Respondent's Brief on Motion to Dismiss
3/11/1935	Reply Brief of Defendant on Motion to Dismiss
4/1/1935	Slip Opinion
9/23/1935	Application for Leave to File Replication
9/23/1935	Motion for the Appointment of Special Master
10/19/1935	Motion of Platte Valley Public Power and Irrigation District for Leave to Intervene and Petition in Intervention.
11/4/1935	Objections to Intervention of Platte Valley Public Power and Irrigation District
11/11/1935	Brief of Platte Valley Public Power and Irrigation District in Support of its Motion for Leave to Intervene.
12/12/1935	Motion for Leave to File Amended and Supplemental Answer, and Amended and Supplemental Answer
12/13/1935	Objections of Complainant to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Amended and Supplemental Answer; and Argument in Support of Objections
12/19/1935	Opposition to Objections of Complainant to Motion of Defendant for Leave to File Amended and Supplemental Answer.
5/2/1936	Reply Brief of the United States in Support of its Motion for Leave to Intervene
5/18/1936	Answer and Cross Bill of the State of Colorado
6/12/1936	Replication to Amended and Supplemental Answer of the Defendant the State of Wyoming, Replication to the Answer of the State of Colorado, and Answer to the Cross-Bill of the State of Colorado
7/13/1936	Answer of the State of Wyoming to Cross Bill of the State of Colorado
9/14/1936	Replication to the Answer of the Complainant, the State of Nebraska, and Replication to the Answer of the Defendant, the State of Wyoming, Respectively, to the Cross-Bill of the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant.
3/31/1938	Motion on Behalf of the United States for Leave to Intervene and Petition of Intervention
4/21/1938	Objections to the Intervention of the United States
4/22/1938	Objections of the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, to the Motion on Behalf of the United States for Leave to File its Petition of Intervention; and Argument in Support of Objections
4/22/1938	Objection of Complainant, State of Nebraska, to Intervention by the United States, and Brief in Support Thereof
6/15/1938	Petition of Intervention of the United States of America
10/10/1938	Answer of the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, to the Petition of Intervention of the United States of America.
10/10/1938	Answer of Complainant, State of Nebraska, to the Petition of Intervention of the United States of America
10/10/1938	Answer of Defendant State of Wyoming to Petition of Intervention of the United States of America
10/16/1944	Report of Michael J. Doherty, Special Master.
11/10/1944	Exceptions on Behalf of the State of Nebraska, Complainant.
11/13/1944	Exceptions of the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, to the Report, the Findings of Fact, the Conclusions of Law, and the Recommendations of the Special Master.
11/13/1944	Exceptions of Defendant, the State of Wyoming, to the Report of Michael J. Doherty, Special Master.
11/16/1944	Exceptions of the United States, Intervenor, to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Master
1/24/1945	Brief for the United States of America, Intervenor
1/24/1945	Appendices V and VI to Brief of the United States of America, Intervenor.
1/24/1945	Brief of Defendant, State of Wyoming
1/27/1945	Brief of State of Nebraska, Complainant
2/1/1945	Brief for the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant.
2/1/1945	Appendix to Brief of the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant.
2/23/1945	Answer Brief of Defendant, State of Wyoming
2/24/1945	Reply Brief for the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant.
2/26/1945	Answer Brief of Complainant State of Nebraska to Briefs Filed on Behalf of the United States and the States of Colorado and Wyoming.
2/26/1945	Brief on Behalf of the States of Arizona, California, Idaho, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Vermont as Amici Curiae
2/26/1945	Answer Brief for the United States of America, Intervenor
3/5/1945	Portions of the Record Contained in Appendices Submitted With Brief of Parties Vol. I Pages 1-270
3/5/1945	Portions of the Record Contained in Appendices Submitted With Briefs of Parties Vol. II Pages 271-796;
6/11/1945	Bill in Equity [Slip Opinion]
8/27/1945	Complainant's Proposed Form of Decree and Request for Permission to Oppose Proposals of Other Parties
9/10/1945	Form of Decree Proposed by the State of Wyoming, Defendant, the State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, and the United States of America, Intervenor.
9/28/1945	Objections of State of Nebraska to Joint Proposal for Decree Filed by State of Wyoming, Defendant, State of Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, and United States of America, Intervenor.
10/8/1945	Decree
6/1/1953	Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation and to Modify and Supplement the Decree Entered by the Court on October 8, 1945
6/15/1953	Order Modifying and Supplementing Decree of October 8, 1945
10/7/1986	Motion for Leave to File Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief, Petition for an Order Enforcing DecreeΓÇªand Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief
12/18/1986	Wyoming Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Petition
12/19/1986	Memorandum for the United States
1/15/1987	Reply to Wyoming's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Petition
N/A	Answer to Bill of Complaint
N/A	Replication

No. 5, Orig., United States v. California (1945)

File Date	Document Title
10/22/1945	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
11/19/1945	Motion of the State of California for Leave to File Motion and Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to Answer.
12/24/1945	Motion for Leave to Intervene
1/28/1946	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion of Massachusetts for Leave to Intervene
1/28/1946	Answer of State of California Part I
1/28/1946	Answer of State of California Part II
1/28/1946	Answer of State of California Part III
2/8/1946	Reply of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the Memorandum of the Solicitor-General in Opposition to Motion of Massachusetts for Leave to Intervene
2/8/1946	Consent of the State of California to Intervention by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
3/7/1946	Motion to Strike Answer and Memorandum in Support of Motion
4/4/1946	Brief of the State of California in Opposition to Motion to Strike Answer
4/22/1946	Motion of Lawrence Wards Island Realty Company for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae
5/2/1946	Statement by State of California, Pursuant to Request of Court Dated April 22, 1946, of Propositions of Law and Fact Placed in Issue by its Answer.
5/10/1946	Memorandum in Regard to Statement by State of California of Propositions of Law and Fact Placed in Issue by its Answer
5/21/1946	Motion Pursuant to Pre-Trial Conference for Leave to File Answer and Answer
6/6/1946	Motion for Judgment
11/26/1946	Motion for Leave to Intervene
12/20/1946	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion of Robert E. Lee Jordan for Leave to Intervene
1/17/1947	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment
2/5/1947	Supplemental Brief of Lawrence Wards Island Realty Company as Amicus Curiae
2/14/1947	Petition for Allotment of Time for Oral Argument.
2/26/1947	Brief of the National Association of Attorneys General, Amicus Curiae
3/3/1947	Brief of Amici Curiae in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment.
3/3/1947	Motion of California Association of Port Authorities for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae
3/4/1947	Brief for the State of California in Opposition to Motion for Judgment.
3/4/1947	Appendices A to I to Brief for the State of California in Opposition to Motion for Judgement
3/5/1947	Motion for Leave to File Brief and Brief on Behalf of the American Association of Port Authorities, as Amicus Curiae
3/5/1947	Brief in Behalf of the Member Cities of the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers as Amici Curiae
3/7/1947	Brief of the State of New York, Amicus Curiae
3/10/1947	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief as Amicus Curiae
3/11/1947	Brief for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as Amicus Curiae.
3/12/1947	Supplemental Brief of State of California in Reply to Amicus Curiae Brief of Robert E. Lee Jordan.
3/18/1947	Supplemental Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment
3/20/1947	Brief of Amicus Curiae, Robert E. Lee Jordan, in Reply to Supplemental Brief of the State of California.
6/23/1947	Opinion of the Court
7/18/1947	Motion for Leave to File Petition and Petition for Rehearing and Reconsideration of Majority Opinion
9/3/1947	Petition and Brief of Robert E. Lee Jordan for Leave to File Motion as Amicus Curiae, or in the Alternative as Intervenor, With Respect to Two Stipulations Executed July 26, 1947.
9/3/1947	Petition Brief of Robert E. Lee Jordan for Leave to File Brief a Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Petition of the Attorney General for a Proposed Supplemental Decree.
9/13/1947	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Decree
9/18/1947	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Petition and Petitions for Rehearing and Reconsideration of the Majority Opinion.
9/29/1947	Objections to Decree Proposed by Plaintiff and Memorandum in Support of Objections to Proposed Decree.
10/6/1947	Brief of the National Association of Attorneys General, Amicus Curiae, in Support of the Defendant's Petition for a Rehearing and Objections to the Plaintiff's Proposed Decree.
10/27/1947	Order and Decree
11/12/1947	Petition of Robert E. Lee Jordan as Amicus Curiae to Submit for the Consideration of the Court, Certain Additions to the Final Decree Entered in the Above Entitled Action.
1/29/1948	Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Proposed Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum Relative to Proposed Supplemental Decree
2/24/1948	Answer to Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum Relative to Said Answer.
3/22/1948	Brief of Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Government's Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree.
3/25/1948	Memorandum in Regard to Answer by State of California to Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree
4/15/1948	Reply to Memorandum in Regard to California's Answer to Plaintiff's Petition for Supplemental Decree.
4/16/1948	Notice and Motion for Leave to Intervene, Petition for Intervention, and Motion for Injunction and Appointment of Receiver
5/15/1948	Answer to Petition for Intervention and to Motion for Injunction and Appointment of Receiver, Motion to Strike Said Petition and Motion, and Brief in Support of Answer and Motion
5/17/1948	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Intervene, Petition for Intervention, and Motion for Injunction and Appointment of Receiver
12/2/1948	Motion for Clarification of Scope of Inquiry Referred to Special Master and Memorandum in Support of Motion
12/17/1948	Answer to Motion for Clarification of Scope of Inquiry
6/6/1949	Report of Special Master
5/6/1950	Petition
5/22/1951	Report of Special Master
8/1/1951	Brief in Relation to Report of Special Master of May 22, 1951
8/1/1951	Memorandum in Regard to the Report of the Special Master; Motion for Hearing; and Brief in Support of Motion
8/15/1951	Memorandum for the United States in Reply to California's Brief in Relation to Report of Special Master of May 22, 1951
8/15/1951	Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion and Brief and Motion for Appointment of a Master to Conduct Hearings
11/10/1952	Report of Special Master
1/6/1953	Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Filed November 10, 1952
1/9/1953	Exceptions to Report of Special Master Dated October 14, 1952 and Motion for Leave to File Brief and to Present Oral Argument
3/14/1963	Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint or Original Complaint
7/11/1963	State of California's Opposition to United States Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint or Original Complaint and Motion of the State of California to Dismiss United States v. California, No. 5, Original;
9/4/1963	Memorandum for the United States (1) in Reply to Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint or Original Complaint, and (2) in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
11/4/1963	Joint Statement of the Parties Regarding Their Correspondence and Discussions Between 1954 and 1963
3/2/1964	Answer of State of California to Supplemental Complaint.
3/16/1964	Motion for Leave to File Petition in Intervention or File Amicus Curiae Brief.
3/25/1964	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Petition in Intervention
3/30/1964	Memorandum for the State of California in Opposition to "Motion for Leave to File Petition in Intervention or File Amicus Curiae Brief" Filed by Carl Whitson
4/1/1964	Amended Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Filed November 10, 1952, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/1/1964	Exceptions of the State of California to the Report of the Special Master Dated October 14, 1952, Pursuant to Court Order of December 2, 1963.
4/1/1964	Volume I Brief in Support of Exceptions of the State of California to the Report of the Special Master Dated October 14, 1952, Pursuant to Court Order of December 2, 1963.
4/1/1964	Volume II Appendices to Brief in Support of Exceptions of the State of California to the Report of the Special Master Dated October 14, 1952, Pursuant to Court Order of December 2, 1963.
6/13/1964	Reply Brief of the State of California to Brief of the United States in Support of Amended Exceptions to Report of the Special Master
6/15/1964	Brief for the United States in Answer to California's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
6/29/1964	Brief of Amicus Curiae
7/29/1964	Closing Brief of the State of California in Support of Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master.
7/30/1964	Closing Brief for the United States in Support of Its Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
8/4/1964	Reply or Supplemental Brief of Amicus Curiae
8/13/1964	State of California's Response to Amicus Curiae Brief Heretofore Filed by Carl Whitson; Memorandum in Opposition to Whitson Motion for Permission to Orally Argue; and Memorandum in Opposition to Filing of Reply or Supplemental Brief by This Amicus Curiae.
9/14/1964	Response to Defendant's Objection to Jurisdiction and Issues Involved
10/14/1964	Brief of Amicus Curiae State of Alaska in Regard to the Report of the Special Master
10/14/1964	Motion for Leave to Submit Amicus Curiae Brief and for Leave to Present Oral Argument on Behalf of Amicus Curiae
11/12/1964	Supplemental Brief of the State of California Regarding the Entering Into Force of the Convention on the Territorial Sea and Continuous Zone on September 10, 1964.
11/20/1964	Brief for the United States in Answer to the Brief of Amicus Curiae State of Alaska
12/7/1964	California Exhibits to be Used During Oral Argument December 7-8, 1964
8/2/1965	Petition of the State of California for Rehearing and Brief in Support of Petition
1/3/1966	Decree Proposed by the State of California and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Decree.
1/3/1966	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Decree
12/31/1966	Per Curiam Supplemental Decree
9/3/1976	Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree; Proposed Supplemental Decree; and Memorandum Relative to Proposed Supplemental Decree
12/2/1976	Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Proposed Supplemental Decree (No. 2), and Memorandum in Support of the Motion of the United States and in Opposition to the Motion of the State of California
1/4/1977	Response to the Motion of the United States for Entry of a Supplemental Decree (No. 2) and Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of the United States
5/25/1977	Joint Motion for Entry of a Second Supplemental Decree, Proposed Second Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
9/2/1977	Joint Appendix for Proposed Third Supplemental Decree
9/19/1977	California's Opening Brief in Support of its Petition for the Entry of a Third Supplemental Decree
11/30/1977	Brief for the United States in Response to California's Opening Brief and in Support of the United States' Motion for a Third Supplemental Decree
12/27/1977	Petition for the Entry of a Fourth Supplemental Decree, Request for Appointment of a Special Master, Proposed Fourth Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum Relative to Proposed Fourth Supplemental Decree
2/22/1978	California's Reply Brief in Support of its Petition for Entry of a Third Supplemental Decree
2/24/1978	Motion, Proposed Decree and Memorandum on Behalf of the United States
5/15/1978	On Bill of Equity [Slip Opinion]
8/14/1978	United States' Proposed Third Supplemental Decree
8/14/1978	Proposed Third Supplemental Decree in Accordance with Decision of May 15, 1978
10/1/1979	Report of Alfred A. Arraj, Special Master
11/15/1979	Exception of the State of California and Supporting Brief
11/15/1979	Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Alaska in Support of the Exceptions of the State of California to the Report of the Special Master Dated August 20, 1979
12/22/1979	Brief for the United States in Opposition to California's Exception
2/14/1980	Reply Brief of the State of California
6/6/1980	On Exception to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
7/5/1980	Petition for Rehearing
10/24/1980	Response of the United States
1/7/1981	Recommended Supplemental Decree
11/17/2014	Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, and Proposed Supplemental Decree
12/15/2014	Fifth Supplemental Decree
N/A	Motion of City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation, for Leave to File a Memorandum, as Amicus Curiae, and Memorandum of Amicus Curiae in Support of Answer of State of California to Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree
N/A	Motion of City of Long Beach, a Municipal Corporation, for Leave to File a Memorandum as Amicus Curiae and Memorandum of Amicus Curiae in Support of Answer of State of California to Petition for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree

No. 6, Orig., United States v. Louisiana (1949)

File Date	Document Title
1/17/1949	Objections to Motion for Leave to File Complaint by the United States Against the State of Louisiana
1/27/1949	Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/9/1949	Supplemental Memorandum of Louisiana in Support of its Objections to Motion by the Federal Government for Leave to File a Complaint Against Louisiana
3/10/1949	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/5/1949	Brief in Opposition to the Motion of the Federal Government for Leave to File a Complaint Against Louisiana
5/16/1949	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
5/31/1949	Petition for Rehearing
9/1/1949	Demurrer, or Motion to Dismiss on Jurisdictional Grounds, and Conditional Motions
9/27/1949	Motion for Judgment
10/6/1949	Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's "Motion for Judgement"
11/9/1949	Answer
11/14/1949	Motion for Trial by Jury, and Statement in Support of Motion
11/29/1949	Motion for Judgment and Statement With Respect to Motion
2/20/1950	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment
3/20/1950	Brief of Defendant Opposing Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment and Supporting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Other Defenses
6/6/1950	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/14/1950	Petition for Rehearing
9/14/1950	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Decree
9/18/1950	Motion for Leave to File by Amicus Curiae
10/31/1950	Objections to Decree Proposed by the United States and Statement in Support of Objections
11/8/1950	Second Petition for Rehearing
11/14/1950	Memorandum in Regard to the State's Objections to the Decree Proposed by the United States
11/30/1950	Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum on Proposed Decree
1/26/1951	Petition for Rehearing on Decree
1/26/1951	Petition for Rehearing on Decree
5/19/1955	Motion for Modification of Decree and Brief in Support of Motion
8/29/1955	Motion of Defendant, Interposing Plea to the Jurisdiction and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Decree, and Brief in Support Thereof.
9/27/1955	Brief of the United States in Opposition to the "Motion of Defendant, Interposing Plea to the Jurisdiction and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Decree"
9/30/1955	Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Decree
N/A	Brief of Amicus Curiae on Motion for Rehearing.

No. 7, Orig., United States v. Texas (1949)

File Date	Document Title
5/16/1949	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
1/15/1949	Motion for Leave to File Objections and Objections to Motion of United States of America for Leave to File Complaint
1/27/1949	Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
1/29/1949	Supplement to Motion for Leave to File Objections and Objections to Motion of United States of America for Leave to File Complaint
3/10/1949	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/4/1949	Supplemental Statement and Brief for the State of Texas in Support of Objections to Motion of the United States for Leave to File Complaint
8/27/1949	Motion of the State of Texas to Dismiss the Complaint of the United States of America
8/27/1949	Motion for More Definite Statement of Bill of Particulars and for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead
9/27/1949	Motion for Judgment
10/6/1949	Reply in Opposition to Motion for Judgment
11/8/1949	Answer of the State of Texas
11/8/1949	Motion of the State of Texas for Appointment of a Special Master
11/18/1949	Motion for Order to Take Oral Depositions
11/29/1949	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Order to Take Oral Depositions
11/29/1949	Motion for Judgment and Statement With Respect to Motion
12/3/1949	Amended Motion for Order to Take Oral Depositions, Statement in Support, and Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to the Original Motion
1/6/1950	Memorandum in Regard to Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File an Amended Answer
1/16/1950	First Amended Answer of the State of Texas
2/20/1950	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment
3/9/1950	Motion to Pass the Hearing Set for March 27
3/10/1950	Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of State of Texas to Pass the Hearing Set for March 27

No. 8, Orig., Arizona v. California (1953)

File Date	Document Title
12/8/1952	Return of Defendants to Rule to Show Cause and Brief in Support of Return
1/19/1953	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
1/19/1953	Motion on Behalf of the United States of America for Leave to Intervene and Brief in Support of Motion
2/10/1953	Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus, Successor to Fred T. Colter, Applicant for and on Behalf of the State of Arizona and Water Users Under Glen-Bridge-Verde-Highline Projects, and M.C. Augustine, Ione Dockstader, John R. Westberg, E.C. Hildebrand, R.H. Johnson, Joe L. Huerta, Hi-T Ranch Corporation, and Perry C. Green, Melvin A. Green, Harold S. Lauer, Judge Manor, I.F. Nelson, Addie V. Burton, Mary E. Schmid, and E.V. McDaniel, Landholders Under Said Projects, for Leave to File Petition to Intervene.
3/4/1953	Complainant's Objections to Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene
5/19/1953	Answer of Defendants to Bill of Complaint.
5/19/1953	Appendixes to the Answer.
5/20/1953	Motion of Colter Water Project Association, Incorporated, For Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
8/28/1953	Reply to Defendants' Answer.
10/7/1953	Rejoinder of Defendants to Complainant's Reply to Defendants' Answer
12/8/1953	Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America
12/14/1953	Motion on Behalf of the State of Nevada for Leave to Intervene, Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada
2/5/1954	Response of Complainant the State of Arizona to Motion of State of Nevada for Leave to Intervene.
2/11/1954	Answer of Complainant State of Arizona to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America.
4/5/1954	Answer of California Defendants to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America and Summary of the Controversy (Exhibit A)
4/5/1954	Response of California Defendants to the Motion on Behalf of the State of Nevada for Leave to Intervene and Answer of California Defendants to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada
5/13/1954	Memorandum Requesting Pre-Trial Conference
5/26/1954	Response of Arizona to Memorandum of United States of America Requesting Pre-Trial Conference.
5/28/1954	Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Memorandum of the United States Requesting a Pre-Trial Conference
6/1/1954	Reply of the State of Nevada to Answer of California Defendants to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada
6/17/1954	Memorandum of Nevada in Reply to Memorandum Requesting Pre-Trial Conference by the United States of America
7/14/1954	Answer of Complainant State of Arizona to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada.
7/15/1954	Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.
7/15/1954	Motion on Behalf of the California Defendants for Leave to File an Amended Answer to the Bill of Complaint of Arizona and Amendatory Answer.
7/29/1954	Answer of the State of Nevada to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the United States of America
8/13/1954	Response of Complainant State of Arizona to Defendants' Motion to Join as Parties the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.
9/2/1954	Reply of the State of Nevada to Answer of the State of Arizona to Petition of Intervention of the State of Nevada
10/7/1954	Appendixes to the Answer. Vol. II.
10/7/1954	Brief of the California Defendants in Support of Their Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming
12/27/1954	Brief of the State of Utah Opposing the Motion of the California Defendants to Join the State of Utah as a Party to This Action.
12/27/1954	Brief of New Mexico Opposing Motion of the California Defendants to Join as Parties the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.
12/27/1954	Brief of the State of Colorado and the State of Wyoming Opposition the Motion of the State of California to Join the States of Colorado and Wyoming as Parties to This Action
2/7/1955	Brief of the State of Nevada, Intervener, in Re Motion of California to Join as Parties the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming
2/9/1955	Reply Brief of the California Defendants in Support of Their Motion to Join, as Parties, the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming
7/18/1955	Special Master's Report on the Motion of the California Defendants to Join as Parties the States of New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and Wyoming
10/14/1955	Exceptions of Intervening State of Nevada to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Master Concerning California's Motion to Join Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming
10/20/1955	Exceptions of the California Defendants to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Master With Respect to Their Motion to Join the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming and Brief in Support of Exceptions
10/21/1955	Memorandum of the California Defendants in Reply to Motion of the United States for Determination of Questions of Law Presented by the Pleadings in This Cause and the Report of the Special Master
11/1/1955	Memorandum of Arizona (a) in Reply to Motion of the United States for Preliminary Determination of Questions of Law; and (b) in Reply to California's and Nevada's Exceptions to the Master's Report on the Question of Joinder of Four States.
11/4/1955	Response of the States of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico to Motion of the United States of America for Determination of Questions of Law Prior to Determination of Joinder Motion.
11/4/1955	Reply of California Defendants to Arizona's Memorandum Filed November 1, 1955, Directed to the Report of the Special Master
1/3/1956	Petition for Rehearing of Decision Denying Motion to Join the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming
2/13/1956	Complaint and Answer in Intervention by the State of Utah
2/29/1956	Answer of California Defendants to Complaint and Answer in Intervention by the State of Utah and Interrogatories Addressed to the State of Utah by the California Defendants
3/2/1956	Appearance and Statement in Behalf of New Mexico of its Claim of Interest in and to Lower Basin Waters
3/12/1956	Answer of the State of Nevada to Complaint and Answer in Intervention by the State of Utah
3/14/1956	Answer of California Defendants to Appearance and Statement in Behalf of New Mexico of its Claim of Interest in and to Lower Basin Waters and Interrogatories Addressed to the State of New Mexico by the California Defendants
3/15/1956	Response of State of Arizona to Complaint and Answer by the State of Utah
3/15/1956	Response of State of Arizona to Appearance and Statement of New Mexico.
3/19/1956	Answer of the State of Nevada to the Appearance and Statement in Behalf of New Mexico of its Claim of Interest in and to Lower Basin Waters
6/27/1956	Motion for Leave to File Representation of Interest and Representation of Interest by the Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California; Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Arizona; Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona and New Mexico; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Arizona and the Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Indian Community of the Fort McDowell Reservation, Arizona.
7/13/1956	Response by United States of America, Intervenor, to Motion for Leave to File Representation of Interest and Representation of Interest by the Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California; Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Arizona; Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona and New Mexico; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Arizona and the Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Indian Community of the Fort McDowell Reservation, Arizona.
12/7/1960	Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master Report
2/23/1961	The State of Nevada's Exceptions to the Report of Special Master, Simon H. Rifkind, Date December 5, 1960; and the Recommended Decree Included Therein.
2/24/1961	Arizona's Motion for Adoption, With Exceptions, of the Special Master's Report and Recommended Decree.
2/27/1961	Exceptions of the United States, Intervener, to the Special Master's Report and Recommended Decree
2/27/1961	Additional Objections and Exceptions of Imperial Irrigation District and Palo Verde Irrigation District to Report and Recommended Decree of Special Master.
2/27/1961	Exceptions of the California Defendants to the Report of the Special Master
2/27/1961	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Recommended Decree on File Herein, Dated December 5, 1960, Filed by Defendant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, on its Behalf and on Behalf of its Co-DefendantsΓÇª
2/27/1961	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report and Recommended Decree of the Special Master, Dated December 5, 1960
5/20/1961	Opening Brief for the State of Nevada, Intervener
5/22/1961	Opening Brief for Arizona
5/22/1961	Arizona's Legislative History of Sections 4(a), 5 (1st Paragraph), and 8 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act
5/22/1961	Opening Brief of the California Defendants in Support of Their Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
5/23/1961	Brief in Support of Exceptions of the United States, Intervener, to the Special Master's Report and Recommended Decree
8/9/1961	Answering Brief for the State of Nevada, Intervener
8/12/1961	Answering Brief for Arizona
8/14/1961	Answering Brief of the California Defendants to the Exceptions and Opening Briefs of the United States, Arizona and Nevada
8/16/1961	Answering Brief of the United States
9/25/1961	Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians of the Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support Thereof, and Petition of Intervention.
9/29/1961	Closing Brief of Imperial Irrigation District
9/29/1961	Reply Brief for Arizona
10/2/1961	Reply Brief for the United States
10/2/1961	Reply Brief of the California Defendants to the Answering Briefs of the United States, Arizona, and Nevada
10/2/1961	Legislative History Appendixes Accompanying the Reply Brief of the California Defendants to the Answering Briefs of the United States, Arizona and Nevada
10/5/1961	Reply Brief for the State of Nevada, Intervener
10/16/1961	Brief of Arizona in Opposition to Motion of the Navajo Tribe of Indians for Leave to Intervene
10/27/1961	Motions by Navajo Indian Tribe for Reconsideration of its Motion for Leave to Intervene and for Order to United States to Show Cause Why it Should Not be Ordered to Account to the Court as to the Adequacy of its Representation of Navajo Interests; Brief in Support of Motions
10/30/1961	Response of the California Defendants to the Motion For Leave to Intervene, Tendered by the Navajo Indian Tribe, September 25, 1961
11/1/1961	Statement of New Mexico Relating to Motion on Behalf of Navajo Tribe of Indians for Leave to Intervene
11/6/1961	Response of the United States to the Motion on Behalf of the Navajo Tribe of Indians For Leave to Intervene
12/27/1961	Motions by Navajo Indian Tribe for Reconsideration of Its Motion for Leave to Intervene and for Order to United States to Show Cause Why It Should Not be Ordered to Account to the Court as to the Adequacy of Its Representations of Navajo Interests; Brief in Support of Motions
1/9/1962	Evolution of Sections 4(a) and 5 (1st Paragraph) of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (For Use by Arizona on Oral Argument)
6/3/1963	Complaint [Slip Opinion]
9/11/1963	Petition of Defendant the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for Rehearing and Argument in Support of Petition
9/11/1963	Petition of Imperial Irrigation District for Rehearing - With Supporting Material
9/16/1963	Petition for Rehearing Submitted by State of California in Which Join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District
11/18/1963	Decree of Court As Submitted By Imperial Irrigation District
12/18/1963	Memorandum of The United States Respecting Certain Proposals for Inclusion in Decree
12/18/1963	Intervener State of Nevada's Comments On Proposed Decree
12/18/1963	Proposals For Articles I(G), (H), II(B)(2), II(B)(4), II(B)(7) of Decree Submitted by State of California in Which Join the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Palo Verde Irrigation District
12/18/1963	Supplement and Amendment to Imperial Irrigation District's Form of "Decree of Court" as Heretofore and Herewith Submitted
12/18/1963	Agreed Provisions For Proposed Final Decree
12/18/1963	Statement by Arizona on Decree Proposed by the United States
3/9/1964	Decree
1/6/1966	Joint Motion to Amend Article VI of the Decree, to Extend by One Year the Time to Exchange Present Perfected Rights Claims.
1/24/1966	Memorandum for The United States, Intervenor
2/17/1966	Response of Moving Parties to Memorandum of United States
2/28/1966	Order
3/7/1967	Statement of the State of Nevada Relative to Present Perfected Rights in Compliance with Article VI of the Decree of March 9, 1964
3/8/1967	List of Present Perfected Rights Submitted by the State of Arizona
3/9/1967	List of Present Perfected Rights in the State of California (Excluding Federal Establishments) Pursuant to Article VI of Decree
3/10/1967	List of Present Perfected Rights Claimed by the United States
4/11/1967	Reply of the State of Texas in Opposition to Plaintiff's Request for a Supplemental Decree and Preliminary Injunction
12/13/1972	Supplemental List of Present Perfected Rights Submitted by the State of Arizona
5/3/1977	Joint Motion for a Determination of Present Perfected Rights and the Entry of a Supplemental Decree; Proposed Supplemental Decree; and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Supplemental Decree
11/10/1977	Response of the United States to the Joint Motion for a Determination of Present Perfected Rights and Entry of a Supplemental Decree
12/23/1977	Motion for Leave to Intervene as Indispensible Parties by the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation; Joined in by the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae
12/23/1977	Brief of the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation in Support of Motion to Intervene; Joined in by the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae
1/30/1978	Response of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Motion for Leave to Intervene as Indispensible Parties, Filed by the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation and Joined by the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae.
2/24/1978	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition
2/28/1978	Reply of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Response of the United States to the Joint Motion for a Determination of Present Perfected Rights and the Entry of a Supplemental Decree
4/7/1978	Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the Fort Mojave Tribe, the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Confederation of Indian Tribes of the Colorado River; and the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae
4/7/1978	Brief in Support of Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the Fort Mojave Tribe, the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Confederation of Indian Tribes of the Colorado River; and the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae
4/10/1978	Motion of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Cocopah Indian Tribe for Leave to Intervene and Petition of Intervention.
5/22/1978	Response of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Petition of Intervention and Brief in Support Thereof on Behalf of the Fort Mojave Tribe, the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe, the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Confederation of Indian Tribes of the Colorado River and Joined by the National Congress of American Indians as Amicus Curiae.
5/30/1978	Joint Motion for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree; Proposed Supplemental Decree; and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Supplemental Decree
5/31/1978	Memorandum for the United States
6/2/1978	Response of the State of California and Nevada, the Coachella Valley County Water District, and the Imperial Irrigation District to the Motion of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Cocopah Indian Tribe for Leave to Intervene
6/2/1978	Response of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego to the Motion of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Cocopah Indian Tribe for Leave to Intervene and Petition of Intervention.
6/5/1978	Response of the State of Arizona to the Motion of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Cocopah Indian Tribe for Leave to Intervene and Petition of Intervention.
6/9/1978	Memorandum for the United States
9/9/1978	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae on Motions for Leave to Intervene by Certain Indian Tribes.
12/22/1978	Motion of the United States for Modification of Decree and Supporting Memorandum
1/9/1979	Per Curiam
2/14/1979	Response of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Motion of the United States for Modification of Decree.
2/15/1979	Response of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the Cocopah Indian Tribe to Motion of the United States for Modification of Decree
11/21/1979	Motion of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants for Leave to File Exceptions to the Memorandum and Report of Special Master Elbert P. Tuttle and for Stay Order; Exceptions; and Opening Brief of Said Parties in Support of Their Motion and Exceptions.
12/11/1979	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Exceptions
12/17/1979	Memorandum of the Colorado River Indian Tribes in Opposition to the Motion of the States of Arizona, California and Nevada and Other California Defendants for Leave to File Exceptions to the Memorandum and Report of Special Master Elbert P. Tuttle and for Stay Order.
1/7/1980	Elbert P. Tuttle, Special Master Memorandum and Report on Preliminary Issues
4/5/1982	Elbert P. Tuttle, Special Master Report
5/17/1982	Exceptions of the United States and Supporting Memorandum
5/20/1982	Exceptions of the Chemehuevi, Cocopah, Colorado River, Fort Mojave and Quechan Indian Tribes
5/20/1982	Exceptions of the California Agencies to the Report of Special Master Elbert P. Tuttle; Brief of Said Parties in Support of Exceptions
5/20/1982	Exceptions of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Report of Special Master Elbert P. Tuttle; and Brief of Said Parties in Support of Exceptions.
5/20/1982	Exception of the State of Arizona to the Report of Special Master Tuttle Dated February 22, 1982 and Brief in Support of Exception.
5/24/1982	Brief of Amici Curiae
5/24/1982	Exception of the State of Arizona to Report of Special Master Tuttle Dated February 22, 1982 and Brief in Support of Exception
6/19/1982	Answering Brief of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants to the Exceptions and Supporting Memorandum of the United States and the Chemehuevi, Cocopah, Colorado River, Fort Mojave, and Quechan Indian Tribes.
6/24/1982	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae
6/24/1982	Separate Response of the Quechan Tribe to the Exceptions Asserted by the State Parties, et al. to the Special Master's Report Dated February 22, 1982, and Brief in Support Thereof.
6/24/1982	Reply Brief for the United States
6/24/1982	Reply Brief of the Chemehuevi, Cocopah, Colorado River, Fort Mojave and Quechan Indian Tribes
7/8/1982	State Parties' Response in Opposition to Motion of Pyramid Lake Tribe for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae
8/10/1982	Motion of the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada and the Other California Defendants for Leave to File Brief in Response to Reply Briefs of the United States and the Five Indian Tribes; and Brief in Response to Reply Briefs.
9/27/1982	Supplemental Memorandum for the United States With Respect to its First Exception to the Special Master's Report
11/8/1982	Motion to Modify Order
11/19/1982	Motion for Reconsideration
3/30/1983	On Exceptions to Special Master's Report and Recommended Decree and Motions to Intervene [Slip Opinion]
5/5/1983	Motion for Leave to File Petition for Reconsideration out of Time and Petition for Reconsideration by the Quechan Indian Tribe
9/19/1983	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support Thereof
9/19/1983	Proposed Decree of the State Parties and Motion for Comment Period
10/27/1983	Comments on the Decree Proposed by the State Parties and Revised Decree Proposed by the United States
11/10/1983	Comments on the Decree Proposed by the United States and Revised Decree Proposed by the State Parties
3/20/1984	Memorandum for the United States Respecting the Court's Proposed Supplemental Decree
4/16/1984	Per Curiam and Supplemental Decree
7/19/1989	Motion of the State Parties to Reopen Decree to Determine Disputed Boundary Claims With Respect to the Fort Mojave, Colorado River and Fort Yuma Indian Reservations and Supporting Memorandum
9/1/1989	Response of the Tribes to the Motion of the State Parties to Reopen Decree to Determine Disputed Boundary Claims With Respect to the Fort Mojave, Colorado River and Fort Yuma Indian Reservations
9/1/1989	Response of the United States
10/18/1993	Memorandum Opinion, Report and Order No. 14
8/11/1994	Motion of the West Bank Homeowners Association for Leave to Intervene and Brief for the West Bank Homeowners Association
7/30/1999	Report and Recommendation
12/20/1999	Exception of the United States and Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
12/20/1999	Exception by State Parties to Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
12/20/1999	Exception of the Quechan Indian Tribe to the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master and Supporting Memorandum
12/20/1999	Motion of the West Bank Homeowners Association for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of the West Bank Homeowners Association
1/18/2000	Objection of the State of California, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the Coachella Valley Water District and the Colorado River Indian Tribes to the Motion of the West Bank Homeowners Association for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
1/19/2000	Reply of the Colorado River Indian Tribes to the Proposed Brief Amicus Curiae of the West Bank Homeowners Association
2/2/2000	The State Parties' Reply to Exceptions of the United States and the Quechan Indian Tribe to Report of the Special Master
2/2/2000	Reply Brief for the United States in Response to the Exception of the State Parties
2/2/2000	Memorandum of the Quechan Indian Tribe in Reply to the Exceptions of the State Parties
6/19/2000	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
10/10/2000	Supplemental Decree
6/14/2005	The Special Master's Approval of Final Settlements and Recommendations to the Court
3/27/2006	Consolidated Decree
N/A	Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the United States of America
N/A	Brief in Support of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the United States of America
N/A	Reply Brief of the United States of America
N/A	Rebuttal Brief of the United States of America
N/A	Motion of the United States of America for Determination of Questions of Law Presented by the Pleadings in the Cause and the Report of the Special Master
N/A	Exceptions of the Navajo Indian Tribe to the Report of the Special Master, and Brief in Support Thereof.
N/A	Statement of the State of Nevada
N/A	Reply Memorandum of the United States of America to the Brief of the State Parties on Pretrial Issues

No. 9, Orig., United States v. Louisiana (1955)

File Date	Document Title
2/20/1956	Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint Against the State of Louisiana, and Brief in Support of Opposition.
3/7/1956	Memorandum for the United States in Reply to Louisiana's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/19/1956	Motion for Injunction and Brief in Support of Motion
6/4/1956	Memorandum for the United States on Maintenance of Status Quo
6/4/1956	Motion to Dismiss, and Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction, with Supporting Brief
6/22/1956	Motion to Dismiss on Jurisdictional Grounds
8/14/1956	Brief of the State of Mississippi in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint
8/21/1956	Motion for Entry of Default and for Leave to Proceed Ex Parte and Brief in Support of Motion
8/21/1956	Brief for the United States in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on Jurisdictional Grounds
9/7/1956	Reply Brief of the State of Louisiana on Motion to Dismiss on Jurisdictional Grounds
9/7/1956	Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and for Leave to Proceed Ex Parte and Supporting Brief
9/26/1956	Application by Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation, Lessee of Both Parties, for Extraordinary Relief and for Amendment or Interpretation of Decree
9/28/1956	Brief in Support of Application by Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation, Lessee of Both Parties, for Extraordinary Relief and for Amendment or Interpretation of Decree
10/16/1956	Motion to Dismiss as Moot Application of Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation for Extraordinary Relief and for Amendment or Interpretation of Decree and Memorandum in Support of Motion
11/5/1956	Answer of the State of Louisiana
12/4/1956	Motion by the State of Louisiana to Take Depositions
12/13/1956	Motion for Judgment and Statement With Respect to Motion
12/13/1956	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to Motion by the State of Louisiana to Take Depositions
1/9/1957	Reply to the Motion for Judgment and to the Opposition of the United States to Louisiana's Motion to Take Depositions
2/27/1957	Motion for Leave to File Intervention, Brief in Support of Motion, and Interveners' Answer
3/1/1957	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment
3/7/1957	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to the Motion of the Parishes of St. Bernard, Plaque-Mines, Jefferson, Iberia and St. Mary for Leave to File Intervention
3/12/1957	Memorandum for Interveners in Answer to Opposition Memorandum by the United States
3/28/1957	Brief for the State of Louisiana in Opposition to Motion for Judgment by the United States
3/28/1957	Appendix to Brief on Behalf of the State of Louisiana
4/1/1957	Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Right of Intervention, and Supporting Brief in Answer to U.S. Brief for Judgment
4/4/1957	Reply of the State of Louisiana to Brief of the United States on Motion for Judgment
4/5/1957	Brief for the United States in Reply to Louisiana's Opposition to Motion for Judgment, and in Opposition to Louisiana's Motion to Take Depositions
5/27/1957; 6/3/1957	Motion for Leave to File and Brief of the State of Texas, Amicus Curiae
5/29/1957	Memorandum for the United States Regarding the Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae
6/6/1957	Memorandum for the State of Louisiana Regarding the Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae, and the Memorandum by the United States in Response Thereto
6/24/1957	Per Curiam
8/15/1957	Intervention of the State of Alabama with Supporting Brief
11/7/1957	Amended Complaint and Statement With Respect to Amended Complaint
12/24/1957	Separate Answer of the State of Mississippi to Amended Complaint
12/27/1957	Answer of Defendant the State of Texas to Second Cause of Action
12/28/1957	Defenses to Amended Complaint
12/30/1957	Answer of the State of Louisiana to the Amended Complaint
12/30/1957	Motion for Pretrial Conference and Statement in Support of Motion
12/31/1957	Answer and Cross-Bill of State of Alabama to Amended Complaint
1/20/1958	Motions for Judgment and for Dismissal of Cross-Bill Filed by the State of Alabama, and Memorandum in Support of Motions and in Response to Defendants' Motion for Pretrial Conference
2/3/1958	Answer of the State of Texas to the Motion of the United States for Judgment; Motion for Leave to Take Evidence; Motion for Severance and for Separate Trial and Argument; and Statement in Support of Motions and in Reply to Response of the United StatesΓÇª
2/8/1958	Answer of the State of Florida to the Motion of the United States for Judgment; Motion for Leave to Take Evidence; and Statement in Support of Motions and in Reply to Response of the United States to Motion for Pretrial Conference
2/17/1958	Answer of the State of Louisiana to the Motion of the United States for Judgment
2/20/1958	Answer of Alabama to Motion of United States for Judgment and Motion to Dismiss Cross-Bill.
2/20/1958	Answer of the State of Mississippi to the Motion of the United States for Judgment; Motion for Leave to Take Evidence; and Statement in Support of Answer and Motion
3/3/1958	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to Motions for Leave to Take Evidence and for Severance
3/21/1958	Joint Memorandum of the States of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida Pertaining to Schedule for Filing of Briefs and Order of and Allotment of Time for Oral Argument
5/15/1958	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint
8/7/1958	Brief for the State of Alabama in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint
8/13/1958	Joint Brief for the Defendant States on Common Questions
8/13/1958	Brief of the State of Texas
8/14/1958	Brief of the State of Florida in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint by the United States
8/14/1958	Brief of the State of Mississippi in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint.
8/15/1958	Brief of the State of Louisiana in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint by the United States
9/15/1958	Reply Brief for the United States
11/7/1958; 12/8/1958	Motion of the State of Florida for Leave to File Reply Brief to Government's Reply Brief; Florida's Reply to Government's Reply Brief
11/7/1958; 12/8/1958	Joint Reply Brief of the States of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida and Motion for Leave to File
9/1/1959	Louisiana's Reply Brief and Motion to File With Supporting Statement
9/30/1959; 10/12/1959	Memorandum of Additional Research Concerning Correspondence With Spain During Mr. Jefferson's Administration and Motion for Leave to File
10/5/1959; 10/12/1959	Supplemental Memorandum for the United States and Motion for Leave to File
10/12/1959; 10/26/1959	Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Research Concerning United Stated Recognition of Texas' Three League Boundary, and Motion for Leave to File
10/12/1959	Written Memorial of Oral Argument for Alabama
10/30/1959	Supplemental Brief of the State of Mississippi in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint.
11/2/1959	Post-Submission Reply Argument and Memorandum on Behalf of the State of Texas
11/2/1959	Supplemental Brief of the State of Louisiana in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on Amended Complaint by the United States.
11/2/1959	Brief of the State of Florida Filed Subsequent to Argument
11/2/1959	Appendix to Louisiana's Reply Brief and Motion to File With Supporting Statement
11/16/1959	Reply of the United States to Brief Filed by the Defendants After Oral Argument
5/31/1960	On Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Slip Opinion]
6/18/1960	Petition of State of Alabama for Rehearing
6/24/1960	Joint Brief for Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama in Support of Their Respective Petitions for Rehearing
6/24/1960	Appendix to Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana
6/24/1960	Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana
6/24/1960	Appendix to Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana
6/25/1960	Petition of State of Mississippi for Rehearing
8/23/1960	Motion of the States of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama to File a Supplement to Their Respective Petitions for Rehearing Herein by Offering Newly Discovered Evidence, and Statement in Support Thereof.
9/22/1960	Motion of State of California for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae, and Brief of State of California as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitions for Rehearing Filed by the States of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi.
9/24/1960	Brief of Attorney General of Florida, Amicus Curiae, in Support of the Petitions for Rehearing Filed Herein by the States of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama in Which Eleven States Named in the Appendix Join Through Their Attorneys General
11/10/1960	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support of Propose Decree
11/28/1960	Memorandum for the United States Regarding Louisiana's Suggested Revision of Paragraph 3 of the Proposed Decree
12/12/1960	Final Decree
11/23/1965	Motion by the United States for Entry of a Supplemental Decree (No. 1), Proposed Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
11/23/1965	Answer of the State of Louisiana to the Motion of the United States for Entry of a Supplemental Decree (No. 1), and Memorandum Accompanying Answer
12/13/1965	Supplemental Decree
2/25/1966	Accounting of the State of Louisiana Pursuant to the Supplemental Decree Rendered December 13, 1965
2/25/1966	Accounting by United States, pursuant to supplemental decree, December 13, 1965, filed on Feb. 25, 1966. (Not Printed).
4/25/1966	Objections to the Accounting of the State of Louisiana
4/25/1966	Motion for Leave to File Corrections to the Accounting Filed by the State of Louisiana on February 25, 1966
4/26/1966	Motion of United States for leave to file amended account pursuant to the supplemental decree filed on April 26, 1966. (Not Printed).
4/26/1966	Objections by the State of Louisiana to the Accounting Filed by the United States of America Pursuant to Supplemental Decree No. 1, Dated December 13, 1965
7/13/1967	Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Injunctive Relief and Supplemental Decree as to the State of Texas
9/25/1967	Reply Brief of Texas in Opposition to Motion for Injunction and Supplemental Decree
9/25/1967	Motion by the State of Louisiana for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2, Proposed Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
9/25/1967	Motion by the State of Louisiana to Limit the Question to be Considered on the Motion of the United States for a Supplemental Decree as to the State of Texas and Memorandum in Support of Motion
12/4/1967	Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
1/3/1968	Motion by the United States for Entry of a Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 2), Proposed Supplemental Decree and Memorandum in Support of the Motion of the United States and in Opposition to the Motion of the State of Louisiana
5/8/1968	Response and Opposition of the State of Louisiana to the Counter-Motion by the United States for Entry of a Supplemental Decree No. 2 and Alternative Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2; Memorandum in Opposition to the Counter-Motion of the United States and in Support of the Alternative Motion of Louisiana; and Alternative Proposed Supplemental Decree No. 2
7/15/1968	Stipulation Between the United States and the State of Texas Regarding the Historic Coast Line and Boundary of Texas
7/15/1968	Supplemental Decree Proposed by the State of Texas and Memorandum in Support of Proposed Supplemental Decree
7/15/1968	Decree Proposed by the United States and Memorandum in Support Thereof
8/15/1968	Brief for the United States
8/15/1968	Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2; its Response and Opposition to the Counter-Motion by the United States; and Louisiana's Alternative Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree Number 2
8/15/1968	Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2; its Response and Opposition to the Counter-Motion by the United States; and Louisiana's Alternative Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree Number 2
8/15/1968	Appendices to Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 1-21]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 22-41]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 52-69]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 42-51]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 70-76]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 77-87]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 88-103]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 104-113]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibits 114-118]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibit 119 1-5 of 5 & 26-41 of 41]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibit 119 1-7 of 41 & 1-8 of 8]
9/3/1968	Appendix G, Map Exhibits and Related Materials for Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2 [Exhibit 119 8-25 of 41]
9/16/1968	Reply Brief for the United States
9/16/1968	Reply Brief of the State of Louisiana to the Brief of the United States on Cross-Motions for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree No. 2 as to the State of Louisiana
9/16/1968	Reply Brief of the State of Louisiana to the Brief of the United States on Cross-Motions for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree No. 2 as to the State of Louisiana [Inserts]
9/23/1968	Motion by the State of Mississippi to Confine and Limit the Decree on Counter-Motions of the United States and the State of Louisiana to a Settlement of the Issues Between the United States and the State of Louisiana and Memorandum of the State of Mississippi in Support of its Motion
10/10/1968	Motion by the State of Texas to Eliminate the Question of Lateral Boundaries with Neighboring States From the Issues to be Considered on Cross-Motions for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 2)
3/3/1969	On Cross-Motions for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana and On Cross-Motions for the Entry of a Supplemental Decree as to the State of Texas [Slip Opinion]
3/27/1969	Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana of its Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2; and for Rehearing of its Alternative Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 2
5/5/1969	Supplemental Decree
3/29/1971	Joint Motion of the United States and the State of Florida to Initiate Supplemental Proceedings; to Consolidate Proceedings; to Appoint a Special Master; and for Entry of a Supplemental Decree; and Memorandum in Support of Motion
4/21/1971	Motion by the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 3), Proposed Supplemental Decree and Memorandum in Support of Motion
6/25/1971	Objection of the State of Louisiana to the Right of the United States at the time to file a Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 3) and Memorandum in Support of Objection
10/12/1971	Supplemental Alternative Motion of the State of Louisiana for Leave to file Response to the United States' Motion for Entry of Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 3) One Hundred Twenty Days after the Report of the Special Master and for Oral Argument
10/13/1971	Response of the State of Louisiana to the Motion by the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree (No. 3); Motion of the State of Louisiana to Defer This Matter or Alternatively to Refer it to the Special Master Under an Amended Reference and Alternative Supplemental Motion for Oral Argument on the Motion of the United States; Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion by the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree No. 3 and in Support of the State of Louisiana's Motion to Defer This Matter or Alternatively to Refer it to the Special Master Under Amended Reference and in Support of the Alternative Supplemental; Motion for Oral Argument on the Motion of the United States
11/27/1971	Reply of the United States to the Objection, Response, Motions, and Memorandum in Opposition of the State of Louisiana Relating to the Motion by the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree as to the State of Louisiana (No. 3)
12/3/1971	Motion of the State of Louisiana for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
12/20/1971	Supplemental Decree
8/16/1972	Motion by the State of Louisiana for Entry of a Supplemental Decree as to the United States of America (No. 4) Proposed Supplemental Decree and Memorandum in Support of Motion
8/30/1972	Response of the United States
9/6/1972	Motion by the United States for Leave to File Account for Funds Released from Impoundment Pursuant to the Supplemental Decree (No. 3) of December 20,1971 and Account by the United States of Funds Released from Impoundment Pursuant to the Supplemental Decree (No. 3) of December 20, 1971
9/18/1972	Response by the State of Louisiana to the Motion by the United States for Leave to File Account of Funds Released from Impoundment Pursuant to the Supplemental Decree (No. 3) of December 20, 1971 and to the Account by the United States of Funds Released from Impoundment Pursuant to the Supplemental Decree (No. 3) of December 20, 1971 and Memorandum in Support of Response
7/31/1974	Report of Walter P. Armstrong, Jr. Special Master
11/27/1974	Exceptions of the United States and Supporting Memorandum
11/29/1974	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of the Special Master Filed July 31, 1974, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/29/1974	Appendix I to the Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of the Special Master Filed July 31, 1974, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/29/1974	Appendices II and III to the Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of the Special Master File July 31, 1974, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
1/13/1975	Reply Brief of the State of Louisiana in Opposition to the Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master
1/14/1975	Reply Memorandum for the United States
3/17/1975	Per Curiam
4/10/1975	Petition for Rehearing
6/9/1975	Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Proposed Supplemental Decree, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
8/15/1975	First Accounting of the State of Louisiana Required by the Supplemental Decree Rendered on June 16, 1975
8/25/1975	Accounting by the United States as Required by Paragraph 6(b) of the Decree of June 16, 1975
9/15/1975	Accounting by the United States Pursuant to Paragraphs 5(b) and 7 of the Decree of June 16, 1975
9/15/1975	Account by the State of Louisiana Pursuant to Paragraph 5 of the Decree Dated June 16, 1975
10/14/1975	Objections of the United States to the State of Louisiana's Accounting of August 15, 1975
10/22/1975	Objections by State of Louisiana to Accountings and Payments by the United States Under the Supplemental Decree of June 16, 1975 and Brief in Support Thereof
8/27/1979	Supplemental Report of Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Special Master;
11/1/1979	Motion by the State of Mississippi for Entry of a Supplemental Decree Proposed Supplemental Decree Memorandum in Support of Motion for Supplemental Decree
11/8/1979	Exception of the United States and Memorandum in Support of Exception
11/15/1979	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the First Issue in the Supplemental Report of the Special Master Filed August 27, 1979 with Brief in Support of Exceptions and Motion for Oral Argument
11/15/1979	Appendix to the Brief in Support of Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the First Issue in the Supplemental Report of the Special Master Filed August 27, 1979
12/14/1979	Reply Memorandum for the United States
12/15/1979	Reply Brief of the State of Louisiana in Opposition to the Exception of the United States to the Report of the Special Master
1/17/1980	Cross-Motion of the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree and Proposed Decree and Memorandum in Support
2/22/1980	Motion by the State of Alabama for Entry of Supplemental Decree Memorandum in Support of Motion for Supplemental Decree
3/6/1980	Cross-Motion of the United States for Entry of Supplemental Decree and Proposed Decree and Memorandum in Support
4/28/1980	On Exceptions to Supplemental Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
5/23/1980	Petition for Rehearing of Decision on Exceptions to the Supplemental Report of the Special Master
6/22/1981	Supplemental Report of the Special Master
5/12/1982	Final Report of the Special Master
5/24/1982	Motion for Relief from Decree and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief from Decree
5/28/1982	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition
4/30/1984	Report of Walter P. Armstrong, Jr. Special Master
6/25/1984	Exceptions of the United States and Supporting Brief
6/26/1984	Exceptions of the State of Alabama to the Report of the Special Master Filed April 30, 1984, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
6/26/1984	Exceptions and Brief of the State of Mississippi
8/2/1984	Reply Brief for the United States
8/10/1984	Reply Brief for the State of Mississippi
8/13/1984	Reply Brief of the State of Alabama (with corrected page 49)
8/15/1984	Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Alaska in Opposition to the Exception of the United States
2/26/1985	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
3/13/1987	Supplemental Report of Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Special Master
7/2/1987	Exceptions and Brief of the State of Mississippi
9/2/1987	Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Alaska in Support of the United States' Opposition to the Exceptions of the State of Mississippi
9/16/1987	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of the State of Mississippi
3/1/1988	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
10/1/1990	Additional Supplemental Report of Walter P. Armstrong , Jr., Special Master
11/5/1990	Supplemental Decree
1/29/1993	Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Memorandum in Support of the Joint Motion, and Supplemental Decree
2/22/1993	Supplemental Decree
9/14/1998	Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Memorandum in Support of the Joint Motion for a Supplemental Decree, and Proposed Supplemental Decree;
1/2/1968	Petition for Rehearing of Defendant, the State of Texas
N/A	Revised and Enlarged Chart of Evidence a to Seaward Boundaries and Maritime Jurisdiction
N/A	Appendix D to Post-Submission Reply Argument and Memorandum on Behalf of the State of Texas
12/2/1955; 12/12/1955	In the Matter of Motion for Leave by the State of Louisiana to File Petition to Perpetuate the Testimony of Dr. James P. Morgan, and Petition
12/19/1955	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion

No. 10, Orig., Virginia v. Maryland (1957)

File Date	Document Title
9/13/1957	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
9/13/1957	Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Affidavit
10/4/1957	Answer to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Affidavits
11/12/1957	Opposition of the State of Maryland and Brief in Support Thereof
11/29/1957	Brief for the Complainant in Support
2/19/1958	Answer to Bill of Complaint
3/14/1958	Replication and Reply to Defendant's Answer
12/22/1962	Final Report of Special Master

No. 11, Orig., Illinois vs. Michigan (1959)

File Date	Document Title
1/21/1959	Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction and Complaint
1/21/1959	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction
2/16/1959	Motion to Advance and for Summary Judgment
3/12/1959	Motion to Extend Time for Filing of Brief by the States of Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania
3/17/1959	Reply to Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to March 31, 1959 to File Their Brief in Opposition
3/23/1959	Brief in Opposition to Motion of Illinois for Leave to Commence an Original Action for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction
3/31/1959	Brief of the States of Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction and Complaint, and Brief Filed by Complainant.
4/1/1959	Statement of Concurrence by the State of Minnesota in the Position Taken by the State of Wisconsin in its Brief in Opposition to Motion of Illinois for Leave to Commence an Original Action for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction
4/1/1959	Supplemental Brief of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction and Complaint
4/15/1959	Complainant's Reply Brief
5/13/1959	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
5/15/1959	Brief of the State of New York in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction
8/28/1959	Answer of Defendant State of Wisconsin
9/3/1959	Answer of Defendant State of New York
9/5/1959	Answer and Counterclaims
9/24/1959	Reply to Counterclaims.
9/25/1959	Joinder of the State of Minnesota in Answer of the State of Wisconsin
1/11/1960	Consent of the State of Illinois to Intervention by the United States of America
4/8/1960	Answer of the State of Illinois to Petition of Intervention of the United States of America
1/9/1967	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
5/15/1967	Joint Motion and Proposed Decree

No. 12, Orig., Hawaii v. Bell (1962)

File Date	Document Title
4/19/1962	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
4/19/1962	Appendix Exhibits to the Complaint
4/19/1962	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/18/1962	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/21/1962	Plaintiff's Reply Brief
12/3/1962	Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
12/3/1962	Answer
12/21/1962	Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
1/31/1963	Motion by Plaintiff to Advance Date of Argument and Brief in Support Thereof
2/6/1963	Memorandum for the Respondent

No. 13, Orig., Texas v. New Jersey (1962)

File Date	Document Title
5/1/1962	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, and Complaint
5/1/1962	Brief on Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
5/31/1962	Response of Defendant, Sun Oil Company, to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
5/29/1962	Answer of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Complaint of State of Texas
6/1/1962	Response of the State of New Jersey to Prayers for Temporary Injunction Contained in Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
6/25/1962	Answer of Defendant, Sun Oil Company, to Complaint of State of Texas
11/28/1962	Answer of the State of New Jersey to the Complaint of the State of Texas
1/4/1963	Motion for Leave to Intervene, Proposed Answer and Brief of Insurance Company of North America
1/14/1963; 6/3/1963	Motion for Leave to Intervene (State of Florida) and Answer of the State of Florida as Intervenor.
2/1/1963	Brief of Defendant, Sun Oil Company, in Support of Motion of State of Florida for Leave to Intervene
3/19/1963	Motion of the State of Illinois for Leave to Intervene in This Case and to File the Petition in Intervention Submitted Herewith. Brief in Support of Foregoing Motion.
5/10/1963; 6/3/1963	Report of Special Master on Application of Florida for Permission to Intervene
6/3/1963	Brief of the State of Florida
12/2/1963	Report of the Special Master
2/14/1964	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Supporting Brief
2/14/1964	Exceptions of the State of New Jersey to the Master's Report and Supporting Brief
3/13/1964	Reply Brief of the State of Florida
3/14/1964	Reply Brief for the State of New Jersey
3/18/1964; 3/19/1964; 3/30/1964	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of Life Insurance Association of America
3/26/1964	Objection of the State of New Jersey to Motion of Life Insurance Association of American For Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
2/1/1965	Complaint [Slip Opinion]
4/26/1965	Final Decree
5/4/1965	Motion for Clarification and Modification of Opinion
5/25/1965	Motion for Modification of Final Decree

No. 14, Orig., Louisiana v. Mississippi (1963)

File Date	Document Title
5/13/1963	Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Stay Order, and Brief in Support of Motion, Complaint and Application for Stay Order
7/3/1963	Response of Humble Oil & Refining Co.
7/11/1963	Opposition to Motion of State of Louisiana for Leave to File Complaint
9/24/1963	Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/3/1963	Supplement to Brief Opposing Motion of State of Louisiana for Leave to File Complaint and for Stay Order
3/10/1964	Answer of Joseph S. Zuccaro Et Al.
3/10/1964	Answer of the State of Mississippi Coupled with Request for Admissions
3/11/1964	Answer of Humble Oil & Refining Company to the State of Louisiana's Complaint and Application for Stay Order
6/7/1965	Report of Special Master
8/20/1965	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of Special Master
8/20/1965	Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of Exceptions to the Report of Special Master
8/21/1965	Exceptions of the State of Mississippi with Brief in Support Thereof
8/23/1965	Exceptions of Humble Oil & Refining Company to the Report of Special Master
8/23/1965	Brief of Humble Oil & Refining Company in Support of its Exceptions to the Report of Special Master
9/23/1965	Reply Brief for Mississippi to Exceptions and Brief of Louisiana
9/23/1965	Reply of Humble Oil & Refining Company to "Mississippi Exceptions" and Brief Thereto
9/25/1965	Brief on Behalf of the State of Louisiana in Reply to the Original Brief of the State of Mississippi
5/11/1966	Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana
4/18/1966	Per Curiam and Decree

No. 15, Orig., Alabama v. United States (1963)

File Date	Document Title
5/18/1963	Motion for Leave to File Original Bill of Complaint and Original Bill of Complaint
5/23/1963	Notice of Amendment to Complaint
5/23/1963	Brief in Response to Motion for Leave to File Original Bill of Complaint
5/23/1963	Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Original Bill of Complaint

No. 16, Orig., Arizona v. California (1964)

File Date	Document Title
3/3/1964	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
4/27/1964	Brief of the State of California in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/2/1964	Brief of Defendant Charles L. Harney, Inc., in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/13/1964	Reply of Plaintiff

No. 17, Orig., Nebraska v. Iowa (1964)

File Date	Document Title
7/20/1964	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Statement in Support of Motion, and Complaint
7/20/1964	Brief of the State of Nebraska in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Original Bill of Complaint
8/5/1964	Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Affidavit and Statement in Support of Motion
8/14/1964	Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Affidavit in Support of Opposition
9/17/1964	Brief of Defendant, State of Iowa, in Opposition to Motion to File Bill of Complaint
10/6/1964	Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
10/13/1964	Motion for Leave to File Petition of Intervention, Statement in Support of Motion and Petition of Intervention
12/10/1964	Motion by Roy M. Harrop, Intervenor, for Reconsideration of the Petition of Intervention, Denied by the Court, Entered in the Above Entitled Case, November 16, 1964.
3/30/1965	Answer of Defendant, State of Iowa, to Complaint of Plaintiff, State of Nebraska
8/11/1965	Amended Answer of Defendant, State of Iowa, to Complaint of Plaintiff, State of Nebraska
1/19/1966	Amended Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant, State of Iowa, to Complaint of Plaintiff, State of Nebraska
2/12/1966	Answer to Counterclaim
9/27/1971	Iowa's Proposed Draft of Report and Recommendations of Honorable Joseph P. Willson, Special Master
11/9/1971	Report of Special Master
12/22/1971	Exceptions of the State of Nebraska to the Report of Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
12/23/1971	Iowa's Exceptions to Special Master's Report
1/19/1972	Iowa's Reply to Nebraska's Exceptions to Special Master's Report
1/21/1972	Reply Brief of Plaintiff, State of Nebraska, to Iowa's Exceptions to Special Master's Report
1/29/1972	Supplemental Brief of Plaintiff, State of Nebraska in Answer to New Position Taken by Iowa in Her Reply
11/9/1972	Recommended Decree by Special Master
11/30/1972	Iowa's Exceptions to Decree Recommended by Special Master
12/12/1972	Nebraska's Reply to Iowa's Exceptions to Decree Recommended by Special Master
N/A	Plaintiff's Brief and Argument Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson
N/A	Plaintiff's Reply Brief Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson
N/A	Defendant's Brief and Argument Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson
N/A	Proposed Findings Submitted by the State of Nebraska Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson
N/A	Appendix to Defendant's Brief and Argument Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson
N/A	Transcript of Oral Arguments Made Before Hon. Joseph P. Willson, Special Master [Volume I]
N/A	Transcript of Oral Arguments Made Before Hon. Joseph P. Willson, Special Master [Volume II]
N/A	Plaintiff's Resume of Evidence Before the Special Master Honorable Joseph P. Willson

No. 18, Orig., Illinois v. Missouri (1964)

File Date	Document Title
10/9/1964	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
2/17/1965	Response to Motion for Leave to File Complaint.
3/27/1965	Reply to the Defendant State of Missouri's Response to Motion for Leave to File Complaint.
4/14/1965	Additional Response.
6/25/1965	Motion to Make Complaint More Definite and Certain
1/31/1966	Amended Complaint
4/13/1966	Answer
3/2/1970	Report of Special Master
6/22/1970	Decree
N/A	Part 1 of the Missouri River Planning Report State Conservation Commission January 1961
N/A	Stipulation of Facts

No. 19, Orig., Kelly v. E.H. Schmidt & Assoc., Inc. (1964)

File Date	Document Title
10/27/1964	Motion for leave to file bill of complaint filed on Oct. 27, 1964 (Not Printed)

No. 20, Orig., Kansas v. Colorado (1965)

File Date	Document Title
5/26/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/23/1965	A Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 21, Orig., Wisconsin v. Minnesota (1965)

File Date	Document Title
9/23/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Proposed Complaint
9/23/1965	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/19/1965	Brief on Behalf of Defendant Northern States Power Company in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/22/1965	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 22, Orig., South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1965)

File Date	Document Title
9/29/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief
10/21/1965	Memorandum for the Defendant
11/6/1965	Reply Memorandum for the Plaintiff
11/19/1965	Answer
12/16/1965	Brief on Behalf of the State of Georgia as Amicus Curiae
12/17/1965	Amicus Curiae Brief of State of Alabama
12/18/1965	Brief of the State of Illinois as Amicus Curiae
12/20/1965	Brief of the Plaintiff
12/20/1965	Brief on Behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia Amicus Curiae
12/20/1965	Appendix to Brief on Behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Amicus Curiae
12/20/1965	Brief for the State of Mississippi, Amicus Curiae
12/20/1965	Amicus Curiae Brief in Behalf of the State of Louisiana
12/20/1965	Motion by the State of Alabama for Leave to Intervene
12/20/1965	Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Alabama
1/4/1966	Brief of the Attorney General of Massachusetts, Amicus Curiae, In Which the Several States Shown Herein Have Joined Through Their Respective Attorneys General
1/5/1966	Brief for the Defendant
1/5/1966	Brief of the State of California as Amicus Curiae
3/7/1966	On Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Motion of the Commonwealth of Virginia Requesting Permission to Participate in Oral Argument as Amicus Curiae.

No. 23, Orig., United States v. Alabama (1965)

File Date	Document Title
10/21/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Motion for Expedited Consideration
10/21/1965	Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to File Original Complaints and Motion for Expedited Consideration
11/5/1965	Response of State of Alabama to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 24, Orig., United States v. Mississippi (1965)

File Date	Document Title
10/21/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Motion for Expedited Consideration
10/21/1965	Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to File Original Complaints and Motion for Expedited Consideration

No. 25, Orig., United States v. Louisiana (1965)

File Date	Document Title
10/21/1965	Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to File Original Complaints and Motion for Expedited Consideration

No. 26, Orig., Louisiana v. Katzenbach (1965)

File Date	Document Title
12/7/1965	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Motion for Extension of Time.
12/7/1965	Brief in Support of Motion for Extension of Time to Argue and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Original Complaint
12/8/1965	Memorandum for the Defendant

No. 27, Orig., Ohio v. Kentucky (1966)

File Date	Document Title
3/31/1966	1. Motion for Leave to File Complaint. 2. Complaint. 3. Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint.
5/26/1966	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/12/1966	Answer
8/30/1971	1. Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. 2. Amended Complaint. 3. Brief in Support of Amended Complaint.
10/23/1971	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint
5/15/1972	Report of the Special Master Upon Motion of the State of Ohio for Leave to File Amended Complaint
8/14/1972	Exceptions of the State of Ohio to the Report of the Special Master Filed May 15, 1972 and Brief in Support of Exceptions
10/12/1972	Reply of the State of Kentucky to Exceptions of the State of Ohio to the Report of the Special Master Filed May 15, 1972
3/5/1973	On Motion for Leave to File Amended Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
10/2/1973	1. Motion for Leave to File for Reconsideration. 2. Motion for Reconsideration of Order of March 5, 1973. 3. Brief in Support of Motion for Reconsideration.
4/5/1974	1. Second Motion for Leave to File for Reconsideration. 2. Motion for Reconsideration of Order of March 5, 1973. 3. Brief in Support of Motion for Reconsideration.
1/22/1979	Report of Special Master
4/6/1979	Exceptions of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Report of the Special Master Filed January 22, 1979 and Brief in Support of Exceptions
6/5/1979	Reply Brief of the State of Ohio to the Exceptions of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Special Master's Report
7/27/1979	Brief of Kentucky in Response to Reply Brief of Ohio to Exceptions and Motion for Leave to File
1/21/1980	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
2/15/1980	Petition for Rehearing
11/9/1981	Motion to Intervene of Dorothy Cole, Et Al.
11/9/1981	Motion to Intervene of Dorothy Cole, Et Al.
11/9/1981	Response in Opposition for Leave to Intervene
11/20/1981	Brief of the State of Ohio in Opposition to the Motion to Intervene of Dorothy Cole, Et Al.
5/3/1982	Report of Special Master
5/26/1982	Petition of Dorothy Cole, et al., for Rehearing on Motion to Intervene Denial
4/15/1985	Report of Special Master

No. 28, Orig., Delaware v. New York (1966)

File Date	Document Title
7/20/1966	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief
9/1/1966	Motion for Permission to Be Realigned as Plaintiff
9/27/1966	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/3/1966	Petition for Rehearing

No. 29, Orig., Texas v. Colorado (1966)

File Date	Document Title
10/3/1966	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
1/30/1967	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/14/1967	Memorandum for the United States
5/16/1967	Response of Texas and New Mexico to Colorado's Brief in Opposition, and to the Memorandum for the United States
11/2/1967	Memorandum for the United States
2/10/1968	Answer of the State of Colorado
4/19/1968	Motion for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint in Intervention, and Memorandum for the United States
4/23/1968	Motion for Continuance and Memorandum in Joint Action
11/15/1985	Stipulated Motion for Dismissal and Memorandum of the Parties Thereto

No. 30, Orig., Michigan v. Ohio (1966)

File Date	Document Title
11/21/1966	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
11/21/1966	Brief of the State of Michigan in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/30/1967	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/16/1967	Answer
12/23/1971	Exceptions to Report and Recommendations of Special Master
1/29/1972	Reply to Exceptions to Report and Recommendations of Special Master
9/30/1972	Brief for Plaintiff in Support of Exceptions to Report and Recommendation of Special Master Taken by the Plaintiff and Defendant
10/27/1972	Brief for Defendant in Answer to Exceptions to Report and Recommendations of Special Master Taken by the Plaintiff and Brief in Support Thereof
11/9/1972	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
2/22/1973	Per Curiam and Decree

No. 31, Orig., Utah v. United States (1967)

File Date	Document Title
3/1/1967	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
5/1/1967	Response to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/14/1967	Answer
9/18/1967	Motion of Morton International, Inc. to Intervene as Defendant, and Answer
1/25/1968	Brief of the State of Utah in Opposition to Motion by Morton International, Inc. for Leave to Intervene and Answer
1/26/1968	Motion of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corporation to Intervene as a Plaintiff, and its Complaint
2/5/1968	Reply Brief of Morton International, Inc. to Brief of State of Utah in Opposition to Motion of Morton International, Inc. for Leave to Intervene
2/19/1968	Supplemental Motion of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corporation to Intervene, in the Alternative, as a Defendant, and its Answer and Cross Claim
2/20/1968	Memorandum for the United States
2/20/1968	Reply Memorandum for the United States
2/21/1968	Memorandum for the United States in Response to Motion and Amended Motion of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corporation
2/24/1968	Brief of the State of Utah in Response to the Reply Briefs of the United States the Reply Brief of Morton International, Inc. The Motion and Brief to Intervene by Great Salt Lake Minerals and Chemicals Corporation
4/16/1968	Brief of Morton International, Inc. in Response to Stipulation and Supplemental Memorandum for the United States
4/17/1968	Memorandum of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Regarding Stipulation Between United States of America and State of Utah
4/22/1968	Supplemental Memorandum for the United States and Stipulation
5/17/1968	Joint Motion for Leave to File Stipulation and Brief in Support Thereof
10/28/1968	Report of Special Master
12/11/1968	Exceptions of Morton International, Inc. to Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
12/13/1968	Motion of Great Salt Lake Minerals & Chemicals Corporation for Leave to File Memorandum in Lieu of Exceptions to Report of Special Master, and Memorandum
1/13/1969	Brief of the State of Utah in Support of the Special Master's Report
1/21/1969	Memorandum for the United States on Report of Special Master and Exceptions Thereto by Morton International, Inc.
8/1/1969	Brief of the State of Utah in Support of the Navigability of the Great Salt Lake
10/6/1969	Reply Brief of the State of Utah in Support of the Navigability of the Great Salt Lake
10/26/1970	Report of Special Master
1/8/1971	Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Filed October 26, 1879, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
3/8/1971	Brief of the State of Utah in Support of the Special Master's Report (October 26, 1970), and in Response to the Exceptions Filed by the United States (January 8, 1971)
4/21/1971	Reply Brief for the United States
4/21/1971	Brief of the United States with Respect to the Navigability of the Great Salt Lake
4/22/1971	Motion by State of Utah for Leave to File Supplemental Brief, Statement in Support of Motion, and Supplemental Brief
3/1/1972	Motion by the State of Utah, and Statement in Support Thereof, Requesting the Court to Enter a Decree.
4/20/1972	Memorandum for the United States Concerning the Decree
3/19/1974	Report of Special Master
5/29/1974	Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Filed April 15, 1974, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
6/12/1974	Reply Brief of the State of Utah in Support of the Special Master's Report on Reliction
12/13/1974	Reply Brief for the United States
2/19/1975	Per Curiam
4/26/1976	Report of Special Master

No. 32, Orig., Missouri v. Nebraska (1967)

File Date	Document Title
5/26/1967	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/22/1967	Brief of Defendant, State of Nebraska, in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint of State of Missouri
11/2/1967	Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Amendment to Complaint
3/9/1968	Answer
7/8/1968	Plaintiff's Second Amendment to Complaint
1/19/1974	Stipulation for Dismissal and Motion to Dismiss

No. 33, Orig., Arkansas v. Tennessee (1967)

File Date	Document Title
10/13/1967	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Statement in Support of Motion, and Complaint.
12/9/1967	Brief of State of Tennessee in Opposition to Motion of State of Arkansas for Leave to File Complaint.
1/25/1968	Petition for Temporary Stay Order.
3/5/1968	Answer and Counterclaim of the State of Tennessee.
10/20/1969	Report to the Supreme Court of the United States by Gunnar H. Nordbye, Special Master.
12/4/1969	Exceptions to Report of Special Master and Plaintiff's Brief in Support Thereof
1/3/1970	Defendant's Brief in Support of Master's Report
2/25/1970	Per Curiam
2/25/1970	Decree
6/11/1970	Report of Boundary Commissioner and recommendation or entry of stipulation decree filed on June 11, 1970 (Not Printed)
6/23/1970	Decree

No. 34, Orig., New Jersey v. New York (1968)

File Date	Document Title
1/22/1968	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
1/22/1968	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/2/1968	Brief of the State of New York in Response to the Motion of the State of New Jersey for Leave to File a Complaint
3/19/1968	Brief of Defendant Hudson Rapid Tubes Corporation in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 35, Orig., United States v. Maine (1969)

File Date	Document Title
4/1/1969	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
5/29/1969	Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia in Opposition to the Motion of the United States for Leave to File Complaint
5/29/1969	Joiner of the State of Florida in brief of State of Maine in opposition filed. NOT PRINTED.
5/31/1969	Brief of the State of Maine in Opposition to Motion of the United States of America for Leave to File Complaint, and Statement of States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia and Florida with Respect Thereto.
6/2/1969	Joiner of the State of North Carolina in brief of State of Maine in opposition filed. NOT PRINTED.
9/13/1969	Answer of Defendant, the State of New York
9/15/1969	Answer of the State of New Hampshire
9/15/1969	Answer of the State of Maryland
9/15/1969	Answer of the State of New Jersey
9/15/1969	Answer of the Commonwealth of Virginia
9/15/1969	Answer State of North Carolina
9/15/1969	Answer of the State of Florida
9/15/1969	Answer of the State of Rhode Island
9/15/1969	Answer of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
9/16/1969	Answer of the State of Delaware
9/16/1969	Answer of the State of South Carolina
9/17/1969	Answer of the State of Maine
9/22/1969	Defenses and Answer of the State of Georgia
1/14/1970	Motion of the United States for Judgment and Brief in Support of Motion
1/30/1970	Motion by Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia for Reference of Case to a Master
2/5/1970	Motion by the State of New York for Reference of Case to a Master
2/9/1970	Motion for Severance of the State of Florida and for the Appointment of a Special Master and Brief in Support of Motion
2/11/1970	Motion by New Jersey for Reference of Case to a Master
2/25/1970	Motion of the State of Georgia for Reference of Case to a Master
2/4/1971	Amended Answer of the State of Florida
3/29/1971	Motion by the United States to Dismiss the Counterclaim and Deny the Demand for Jury Trial Filed by the State of Florida and Memorandum in Support of Motion
3/29/1971	Joint Motion of the United States and the State of Florida to Consolidate Proceedings Herein Against the State of Florida with United States v. State of Louisiana, et al., No. 9, Original, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
3/31/1971	Report of the Special Master Upon Motion of the State of Florida for Severance
9/20/1971	Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Brief as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the Florida Council of 100, Inc.
6/9/1972	Motion by the Defendant, Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Preliminary Injunction and Brief in Support Thereof
6/17/1972	Supplementary Affidavit in Support of Motion by the Defendant, Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Preliminary Injunction
6/21/1972	Rebuttal Brief by the Defendant Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/18/1973	Motion by the Defendant, Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Preliminary Injunction and Brief in Support Thereof
6/1/1973	Brief for the United States in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
10/15/1974	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
11/29/1974	Exceptions and Brief of the Common Counsel States
11/29/1974	Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the Common Counsel States Supplemental Brief for the Common Counsel States
11/29/1974	Appendix to Exceptions and Brief of the Common Counsel States Volume 1 - Testimony
11/29/1974	Appendix to Exceptions and Brief of the Common Counsel States Volume 2 - Exhibits
11/29/1974	Appendix to Exceptions and Brief of the Common Counsel States Volume 3 - Maps
11/29/1974	Amicus Curiae Brief of the Special Committee on Tidelands of the National Association of Attorneys General
11/29/1974	Appendices I, II, II, IV, and V to the Amicus Curiae Brief of the Special Committee on Tidelands of the National Association of the Attorneys General
12/2/1974	Exceptions to Report of Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions of the States of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia
12/30/1974	Motion and Brief of Associated Gas Distributors as Amicus Curiae
1/21/1975	Response of the United States to the Defendants' Exceptions
2/13/1975	Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Development and the Coastal Zone
2/20/1975	Reply Brief for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
2/21/1975	Reply Brief of the Common Counsel States
3/17/1975	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
4/3/1975	Motion for Reservation of Jurisdiction
7/16/1975	Joint Motion for Entry of a Decree, Proposed Decree, and Memorandum for the United States in Support of Motion
12/17/1976	Motion for Supplemental Proceedings and for Appointment of a Special Master to Determine the Coastline of the State of Rhode Island, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
1/11/1977	Joint Motion for Supplemental Proceedings and for Appointment of a Special Master to Determine the Coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
2/16/1977	Objection to Motion for Supplemental Proceedings and for Appointment of a Special Master to Determine the Coastline of the State of Rhode Island and Memorandum in Support of Objection.
6/15/1981	Report of the Special Master
2/21/1984	Report of the Special Master
2/21/1984	Report of The Special Master
5/7/1984	Exception of the United States and Supporting Brief
5/9/1984	Exceptions and Brief of the State of Rhode Island
5/10/1984	Exceptions and Brief of the State of New York
6/7/1984	Reply Brief for the United States
6/14/1984	Answer and Reply Brief of the State of New York to Exception of the United States
6/18/1984	Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Alaska In Opposition To the Exception of the United Statas
6/28/1984	Answer and Reply Brief of the State of Rhode Island to the Exception of the United States
8/2/1985	Exception of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Supporting Brief
9/10/1985	Reply Brief for the United States
10/28/1985	Reply Brief of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
1/31/1996	Joint Motion for Entry of a Supplemental Decree, Memorandum in Support of the Joint Motion, and Proposed Supplemental Decree
N/A	Application of the State of Rhode Island for Extension of Time Within Which to File Answer or Otherwise Move
N/A	Application of the State of Maine for Extension of Time Within Which to File Answer or Otherwise Move
N/A	Before the Special Master Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the Common Counsel States Opposition of the Common Counsel State to Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the Plaintiff Brief for the Common Counsel States Vol. I
N/A	Before the Special Master Brief for the Common Counsel States Volume II
N/A	Post-Trial Brief for the United States
N/A	Reply Brief of the United States
N/A	Response of United States to Rejoinder Brief for Common Counsel States
N/A	Rejoinder Brief for the Common Counsel States

No. 36, Orig., Texas v. Louisiana (1969)

File Date	Document Title
12/10/1969	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
2/5/1970	Opposition of the State of Louisiana to the Filing of the Complaint by the State of Texas, and Memorandum in Support Thereof
4/20/1970	Motions and Answer of the State of Louisiana to Complaint by the State of Texas
5/27/1970	Motion for Judgment and Memorandum with Respect to the Motion and Reply to Defendant's Answer and Motion
7/29/1970	Brief for the State of Texas in Support of Judgment
8/3/1970	Amended Answer and Counterclaims of the State of Louisiana
9/2/1970	Answer of the State of Texas to Counterclaims of the State of Louisiana
11/12/1970	Reply Brief by Louisiana to the Brief of the State of Texas in Support of its Motion for Judgment
12/11/1970	Plaintiff's Reply Brief
5/22/1972	Report of Special Master
7/4/1972	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of the Special Master and Motion of the State of Louisiana for Oral Argument on the Exceptions
7/4/1972	Brief of the State of Louisiana in Support of the Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and in Support of the Motion for Oral Argument
7/7/1972	Acceptance of the State of Texas of the Report of the Special Master, with One Exception
8/2/1972	Brief of the State of Texas in Support of the Special Master's Report and in Reply to Exceptions Filed by the State of Louisiana
12/5/1972	Rebuttal Brief of the State of Louisiana in Answer to the Brief of the State of Texas in Support of the Special Master's Report
3/20/1973	On Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
4/11/1973	Motion for Rehearing and Alternative Motion to Enlarge the Reference to the Special Master to Fix the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas, and the United States to the Extent of Louisiana's Title Under the Submerged Lands Act or, in the Further Alternative, as a Motion for Leave of Louisiana, Within a Time to be Fixed by This Court, to File an Amended Cross-Claim Against Texas and the United States to Establish the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas and the United State to the Gulfward Extent of Louisiana's Title as Acquired Under the Submerged Lands Act, and to Ask That This Claim be Referred to the Special Master to the Same Extent as the Original Claim was Referred to Him in This Case.
6/7/1973	Response to Defendant's Motion to Enlarge the Reference to the Special Master to Fix the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas and the United States to the Extent of Louisiana's Title Under the Submerged Lands Act and Further Response to Defendant's Alternative Motion for Leave of Louisiana, Within a Time to be Fixed by the Court, to File an Amended Cross-Claim Against Texas and the United States to Establish the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary Into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas and the United States to the Gulfward Extent of Louisiana's Title as Acquired Under the Submerged Lands Act, and to Louisiana's Request That the Claim be Referred to the Special Master to the Same Extent as the Original Claim was Referred to Him in This Case.
6/11/1973	Rebuttal Brief in Opposition to the Response of the State of Texas Opposing Louisiana's Motion to Enlarge the Reference to the Special Master to Fix the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas, and the United States to the Extent of Louisiana's Title Under the Submerged Lands Act or, in the Further Alternative, as a Motion for Leave of Louisiana, Within a Time to be Fixed by This Court, to File an Amended Cross-Claim Against Texas and the United States to Establish the Extension of Louisiana's Inland Boundary into the Gulf of Mexico Between Louisiana, Texas, and the United States to the Gulfward Extent of Louisiana's Title as Acquired Under the Submerged Lands Act, and to Ask That This Claim be Referred to the Special Master to the Same Extent as the Original Claim as Referred to Him in This Case.
10/1/1973	Motion of the State of Louisiana for Leave to File Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction Against the State of Texas, and Motion by the State of Louisiana for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction Against the State of Texas
10/15/1973	Report of Special Master
11/26/1973	Motion of the United States for Leave to Intervene and Complaint
1/29/1974	Answer of the United States to Complaint of Texas
1/29/1974	Answer of the United States to Complaint of Louisiana
3/12/1974	Motion of the United States for Leave to Amend its Complaint and Amended Complaint
4/1/1974	Motion for Leave to Intervene
4/23/1974	Answer of the United States to Complaint of City of Port Arthur, Texas
4/23/1974	Brief of the United States in Opposition to the City of Port Arthur's Motion for a More Definite Statement
4/14/1975	Report of Special Master
5/27/1975	Acceptance by the State of Louisiana of the Report of the Special Master, With One Exception
5/29/1975	Acceptance of the State of Texas to the Report of the Special Master, With Two Exceptions
6/27/1975	Brief of the State of Texas in Reply to the Exception Filed by the State of Louisiana
6/27/1975	Reply Memorandum for the State of Louisiana
9/15/1975	Brief for the United States in Response to Texas' Brief in Support of its Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
6/14/1976	Per Curiam
7/9/1976	Petition for Rehearing of the State of Texas
8/11/1976	Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Decree
5/16/1977	Decree

No. 37, Orig., Florida v. Alabama (1970)

File Date	Document Title
1/23/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint; Motion to Accelerate Time to File Responsive Pleadings

No. 38, Orig., Alabama v. Finch (1970)

File Date	Document Title
1/26/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint

No. 39, Orig., Mississippi v. Finch (1970)

File Date	Document Title
2/2/1970	Motion for leave to file bill of complaint filed on February 2, 1970. (Not printed)

No. 40, Orig., Pennsylvania v. New York (1970)

File Date	Document Title
3/13/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
3/13/1970	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/7/1970	Brief on Behalf of the State of New York in Response to Motion to File Complaint
8/6/1970	Motion of the State of Connecticut for Leave to Intervene as a Party Plaintiff
8/12/1970	Answer on Behalf of the State of Oregon
8/13/1970	Answer of Defendant the Western Union Telegraph Company to Complaint of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
8/14/1970	Answer of the Defendant, State of New York
8/14/1970	Answer of the Commonwealth of Virginia
8/15/1970	Answer (State of Florida)
11/2/1970	Motion of the State of California for Leave to Intervene as a Party Plaintiff
12/28/1970	Motion of the State of Indiana for Leave to Intervene as a Party Plaintiff
1/2/1971	Motion to Intervene as Defendant (State of Arizona)
2/8/1971	Report of Special Master on Applications of the States of California, Arizona, and Indiana for Leave to Intervene
4/22/1971	Objections of New York to Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
4/27/1971	Motion of the State of Indiana for Leave to Join in the Complaint and the Brief of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
4/30/1971	Intervening Complaint of the State of Connecticut
5/3/1971	Brief of the Attorney General of New Jersey as Amicus Curiae
5/7/1971	Brief of State of California and Motion for Leave to Join in the Complaint of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
12/14/1971	Report of John F. Davis, Special Master
1/18/1972	Exceptions of Intervenor-Plaintiff State of Connecticut to Report of Special Master
1/26/1972	Exceptions of Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to Report of Special Master
1/27/1972	Exceptions of Intervening Plaintiff State of Indiana to Report of Special Master
1/27/1972	Exceptions of Defendant State of Florida to Report of Special Master
1/28/1972	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of American Express Company
2/8/1972	Objection of New York to Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
2/24/1972	Brief in Support of Exceptions of Defendant State of Florida to Report of Special Master
2/25/1972	Brief of Defendant New York in Support of Report of Special Master
3/1/1972	Reply of the State of Oregon
3/24/1972	Reply Brief of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Brief of Defendant New York in Support of Report of Special Master
7/14/1972	Petition for Rehearing
7/14/1972	Petition for Re-hearing
12/27/1972	Supplemental Report of John F. Davis, Special Master

No. 41, Orig., Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. (1970)

File Date	Document Title
4/28/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Statement and Brief in Support of Motion
7/27/1970	Brief of the Dow Chemical Company in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to File Complaint
7/27/1970	Statement and Brief of Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation, One of the Respondents, in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Complaint, With Appendices
7/27/1970	Brief of Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/21/1970	Brief of Amicus Curiae in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/25/1970	Brief of the State of Ohio in Support of the Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/7/1970	Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/4/1971	Brief of the Dow Chemical Company in Reply to Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/4/1971	Reply Brief of Wyandotte Chemicals Corporation to the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/4/1971	Brief of Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited in Reply
1/16/1971	Pollution of Lake Eerie Lake Ontario and the International Section of the St. Lawrence River
3/23/1971	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 42, Orig., Massachusetts v. Laird, Secretary of Defense (1970)

File Date	Document Title
7/22/1970	Motion of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/22/1970	Brief for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/7/1970	Amicus Curiae Brief on Behalf of the Constitutional Lawyers' Committee on Undeclared War
9/9/1970	Amicus Curiae Brief on Behalf of the Lawyers Committee on American Policy Towards Vietnam
9/22/1970	Brief for the Defendant Opposing the Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/23/1970	Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Amici Curiae
9/24/1970	Supplement to Brief for the Defendant
10/6/1970	Supplemental Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Amici Curiae
10/9/1970	Supplemental Brief for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/14/1970	Motion of Constitutional Lawyers Committee on Undeclared War for leave to file supplemental brief, as amicus curiae, filed (not printed)
10/27/1970	Motion of John M. Wells Et Al for Leave To Be Admitted as Amicus Curiae to File Brief Or In the Alternative To Be Admitted as Interested Parties, and Brief
11/9/1970	Supplemental Amicus Curiae Brief on Behalf of the Constitutional Lawyers' Committee on Undeclared War

No. 43, Orig., Oregon v. Mitchell (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/3/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, Motion to Expedite and Briefs in Support of Motions
8/18/1970	Memorandum for the Defendant
9/9/1970	Motion to Intervene by New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/10/1970	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of the Department of Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
9/11/1970	Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/12/1970	Brief of Youth Franchise Coalition, Fifty Individual Citizens of the United States Over 18 Years Old and Under 21 Years Old, Americans for Democratic Action, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, American Civil Liberties Union, National Education Association and International Union, United Automobile Workers, Amicus Curiae
9/15/1970	Brief of the Plaintiff
9/29/1970	Memorandum for the Defendant in Opposition to Intervention by the New York City Board of Elections
10/1/1970	Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae
10/12/1970	Answers and Brief for the Defendant
10/12/1970	Brief of the Democratic National Committee, Amicus Curiae
10/15/1970	Brief on the Merits by the State of Mississippi as Amicus Curiae and Request for Oral Argument
10/16/1970	Plaintiff's Reply Brief
12/21/1970	On Bills of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Brief of Intervenor New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970

No. 44, Orig., Texas v. Mitchell (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/3/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Motion for Expedited Consideration
8/3/1970	Brief on Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/18/1970	Memorandum for the Defendant
9/9/1970	Motion to Intervene by New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/9/1970	Brief on the Merits in Support of Plaintiff, the State of Texas, Submitted by the State of Indiana, Joined by the States of Idaho, Louisiana, Ohio, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming, as Amici Curiae
9/11/1970	Brief for the Plaintiff
9/29/1970	Memorandum for the Defendant in Opposition to Intervention by the New York City Board of Elections
10/1/1970	Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae
10/12/1970	Answers and Brief for the Defendant
10/15/1970	Brief on the Merits by the State of Mississippi as Amicus Curiae and Request for Oral Argument
12/21/1970	On Bills of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
1/14/1971	Motion for Leave to Intervene, Motion for Rehearing, and Brief in Support of Said Motions
N/A	Brief of Intervenor New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970

No. 45, Orig., Washington v. General Motors Corp. (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/5/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
8/5/1970	Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/24/1970	Motion for Order of Court Granting Leave to Petitioner to Join Cause as Party Plaintiff
10/3/1970	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/12/1970	Motion for Order of Court Granting Leave to Petitioner to Join Cause as Party Plaintiff
11/2/1970	Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/16/1971	Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/1/1971	Brief for the States of Alabama, et al., as Amici Curiae
9/16/1971	Motion for Leave to Intervene, Proposed Complaint, Affidavits and Brief in Support Thereof
12/22/1971	Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/22/1971	Separate Appendix to Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum
2/19/1972	Plaintiffs' Memorandum on Choice of Substantive Law and Brief in Reply to Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum
2/22/1972	Defendants' Memorandum on Source of Law
2/26/1972	Special appendix (reporter's transcript) to Plaintiff's memo. On choice of subst. law and brief in reply to Defendants' supplemental memorandum filed. NOT PRINTED.
3/3/1972	Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum After Argument and Supplemental Argument

No. 46, Orig., United Stated v. Arizona (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/17/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Motion for Expedited Consideration
8/17/1970	Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to File Original Complaints, Motions for Expedited Consideration and Motion for Interim Relief
8/26/1970	Response to motion for leave to file complaint and to expedite not printed
9/9/1970	Motion to Intervene by New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/11/1970	Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/12/1970	Brief of Youth Franchise Coalition, Fifty Individual Citizens of the United States Over 18 Years Old and Under 21 Years Old, Americans for Democratic Action, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, American Civil Liberties Union, National Education Association and International Union, United Automobile Workers, Amicus Curiae
9/15/1970	Brief for the United States
10/1/1970	Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae
10/3/1970	Motion to Intervene by Frederick J. Christopher. Jr., Benton Cole, Salvatore Lo Dico, George C. Smith, and Raymond J. Meredith, as Defendants
10/12/1970	Answer and Brief for the State of Arizona
10/15/1970	Brief on the Merits by the State of Mississippi as Amicus Curiae and Request for Oral Argument
12/21/1970	On Bills of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Brief of Intervenor New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
N/A	Vide Nos. 43, 44 Orig. for related briefs

No. 47, Orig., United States v. Idaho (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/17/1970	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Motion for Interim Relief and Motion for Expedited Consideration
8/17/1970	Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to File Original Complaints, Motions for Expedited Consideration and Motion for Interim Relief
9/9/1970	Motion to Intervene by New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/11/1970	Amici Curiae Brief in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
9/15/1970	Brief for the United States
10/1/1970	Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae
10/12/1970	Brief for the State of Idaho
10/12/1970	Brief on Behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia - Amicus Curiae
10/15/1970	Brief on the Merits by the State of Mississippi as Amicus Curiae and Request for Oral Argument
10/15/1970	Answer for the State of Idaho
12/21/1970	On Bills of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Brief of Intervenor New York City Board of Elections in Support of the Constitutionality of Title III of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
N/A	Response to motion for leave to file complaint and to expedite not printed
N/A	Vide Nos. 43, 44 Orig. for related briefs

No. 48, Orig., Mississippi v. Arkansa (1970)

File Date	Document Title
11/6/1970	Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Stay Order and Brief in Support of Motion, Complaint and Application for Stay Order
12/24/1970	Response to Motion to File Complaint, Motion to Dismiss, and Brief in Support Thereof
2/16/1971	Answer
4/2/1973	Report of Special Master
5/14/1973	Exceptions of State of Arkansas to Report of Honorable Clifford O'Sullivan, Special Master
6/16/1973	Response of the State of Mississippi to the Exceptions of the State of Arkansas to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Master
2/26/1974	On Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 49, Orig., Illinois v. City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (1970)

File Date	Document Title
12/9/1970	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint and Statement and Brief in Support of Motion
1/14/1971	Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Bill of Complaint
2/2/1971	Brief of City of Racine in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Bill of Complaint
2/3/1971	Brief of the Sewerage Commission of the City of Milwaukee
2/4/1971	Brief of Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Bill of Complaint
2/4/1971	Brief of the Metropolitan Sewerage Commission of the County of Milwaukee
2/18/1971	Plaintiff's Reply Brief
2/14/1972	Supplemental Brief of Racine and Kenosha
2/16/1972	Memorandum Brief
2/19/1972	Plaintiff's Brief Regarding the Applicable Law
2/19/1972	Brief of Metropolitan Sewerage Commission of the County of Milwaukee

No. 50, Orig., Vermont v. New York (1970)

File Date	Document Title
12/30/1970	[Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion]
2/8/1971	[Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff and for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion]
3/30/1971	Brief of International Paper Company in Opposition to Vermont's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/30/1971	Brief of International Paper Company in Opposition to Monroe County Conservation Council's Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff and for Leave to File Complaint
3/31/1971	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/15/1971	Supplemental Brief of the State of Vermont in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/19/1971	Reply Brief to Briefs of Defendants Opposing Monroe County Conservation Council's Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff and Opposing Vermont's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/19/1972	Memorandum of the State of Vermont on Whether Federal or State Law Governs Substantive Issues
2/19/1972	Supplemental Memorandum of Defendant State of New York Relating to Choice of Law
2/22/1972	Memorandum of International Paper Company on Whether Federal or State Law Governs Substantive Issues
6/19/1972	Answer of Defendant International Paper Company
6/19/1972	Answer
6/19/1972	Exhibit "A" to Answer
12/1/1972	Motion of the United States of America for Leave to Intervene, Memorandum in Support of Motion and Petition of Intervention
4/24/1974	Report of Special Master, Stipulation, and Proposed Consent Decree
4/24/1974	Stipulation

No. 51, Orig., Founding Church of Scientology v. Cromer (1971)

File Date	Document Title
4/7/1971	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/14/1971	Memorandum for the United States Suggesting Immunity

No. 52, Orig., United States v. Florida (1970)

File Date	Document Title
8/27/1971	Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion by the United States to Dismiss the Counterclaim and Deny the Demand for Jury Trial Filed by the State of Florida
12/20/1971	Report of the Special Master Upon the Motion by the United States to Dismiss the Counterclaim and Deny the Demand for Jury Trial Filed by the State of Florida
2/19/1974	Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
4/23/1974	Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Filed February 19, 1974, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/23/1974	Brief of Amici Curiae States of Delaware, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Virginia
4/24/1974	Exceptions to Report of Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
8/8/1974	Florida's Response to Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master
8/8/1974	Florida's Response to Exceptions of the United States to the Report of the Special Master Appendix
8/9/1974	Brief of the United States in Response to Defendant's Brief in Support of its Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
2/6/1975	Reply Brief of the United States
3/17/1975	Per Curiam
12/30/1975	Supplemental Report of Albert B. Maris, Special Master
4/30/1976	Joint Motion for Entry of a Decree, Proposed Decree, and Memorandum in Support of Motion

No. 53, Orig., Alabama v. Connally, Secretary of the Treasury (1971)

File Date	Document Title
7/20/1971	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/20/1971	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/2/1971	Brief for the Defendants in Opposition

No. 54, Orig., United States v. Florida (1971)

File Date	Document Title
12/13/1971	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
2/24/1972	Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/19/1972	Answer of the State of Texas and Motions for Severance and Appointment of a Special Master
5/20/1972	Answer and Affirmative Defenses
6/19/1972	Memorandum for the United States in Opposition to the Motions by the State of Texas for Severance and Appointment of a Special Master
6/15/1975	Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim, Counterclaim and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim by Defendants States of Florida and Texas
9/29/1975	Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim
10/30/1975	Response to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim
3/31/1976	Report of Special Master on Motion of Defendants for Leave to File a Counterclaim
6/2/1976	Defendants' Exception to Report of Special Master on Motion of Defendants for Leave to File a Counterclaim
7/16/1976	Response of the United States to the Defendants' Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
2/23/1977	Per Curiam
12/10/1977	Joint Motion to Dismiss
12/23/1977	Report of Special Master on Joint Motion to Dismiss

No. 55, Orig., Webb v. Porter (1972)

File Date	Document Title
2/24/1972	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
4/21/1972	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/2/1972	Reply to Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 56, Orig., Virginia v. International Air Transport Ass'n (1972)

File Date	Document Title
6/20/1972	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
6/20/1972	Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/18/1972	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/21/1972	Brief on Behalf of Defendant, Olympic Airways, S.A.
9/19/1972	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of The Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade

No. 57, Orig., Illinois v. Michigan (1972)

File Date	Document Title
6/23/1972	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
8/10/1972	Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief
8/24/1972	Brief for Defendant in Opposition
9/9/1972	Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and Reply Brief
9/11/1972	Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief on Behalf of Jack Federoff and William F. Ewing, D/B/A William Ewing Roofing Company

No. 58, Orig., American Party v. New York (1972)

File Date	Document Title
9/20/1972	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Statement in Support of Motion to File Bill of Complaint, Brief in Support of Motion to File Bill of Complaint and Complaint
9/20/1972	Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
9/27/1972	Affidavit in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
11/24/1972	Brief for Defendant Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 59, Orig., United States v. Nevada (1972)

File Date	Document Title
9/22/1972	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
1/2/1973	California's Brief In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint
1/3/1973	Brief of the State of Nevada In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint
1/15/1973	Motion For Leave To File Brief As Amicus Curiae, And Brief of Association on American Indian Affairs, Inc., As Amicus Curiae, In Support of Motion For Leave To File Complaint
1/16/1973	Reply Brief For The United States
1/18/1973	Brief of Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, Amicus Curiae, In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint
1/18/1973	Brief of The Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians As Amicus Curiae In Support of Motion For Leave To File Complaint
4/12/1973	Supplemental Reply Brief For The United States
6/11/1973	Per Curiam

No. 60, Orig., Pennsylvania v. New York (1972)

File Date	Document Title
12/8/1972	Motion For Leave To File Complaint and Complaint
1/30/1973	Brief of the State of North Carolina Opposing Motion For Leave To File Complaint
2/5/1973	Brief For Defendant Commonwealth of Massachusetts In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint
2/6/1973	Brief of Defendant Commonwealth of Virginia In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint
2/9/1973	Brief of New York Opposing Pennsylvania's Motion For Leave To File A Complaint
2/9/1973	Brief of Defendant State of Oklahoma In Opposition To Motion For Leave To File Complaint and Complaint
2/12/1973	Brief of The State of Kansas Opposing The Motion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania For Leave To File A Complaint
2/12/1973	Brief of Defendant State of Maine In Opposition
3/1/1973	Brief of The State of New Jersey Opposing Motion of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania For Leave To File A Complaint
4/10/1973	Petition For Rehearing

No. 61, Orig., Petersen v. Spiliotopoulos (1973)

File Date	Document Title
1/31/1973	Motion for leave to file bill of complaint filed. NOT PRINTED.
4/30/1973	Motion In Opposition To Motion To File Complaint & Brief In Support of Motion

No. 62, Orig., Nevada v. California (1973)

File Date	Document Title
4/24/1973	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief
6/21/1973	Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief

No. 63, Orig., Georgia v. Nixon (1973)

File Date	Document Title
5/10/1973	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
8/17/1973	Memorandum for the Defendants
9/26/1973	Brief for Amici Curiae
9/27/1973	Brief of Amicus Curiae the City of New York in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 64, Orig., New Hampshire v. Maine (1973)

File Date	Document Title
6/6/1973	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
6/11/1973	Motion for Expeditious Consideration and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
8/2/1973	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/10/1973	Plaintiff's Reply Brief to Defendant's Brief Opposing Leave to File Complaint
4/4/1974	Answer
9/20/1974	Motion to Intervene. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene.
10/14/1975; 11/3/1975	Report of Tom C. Clark Special Master
12/19/1975	Exceptions of the State of Maine to the Report of the Special Master Filed October 4, 1975, and Brief in Support of Exceptions
12/18/1975	Motion and Brief of Amicus Curiae, the New Hampshire Commercial Fisherman's Association.
12/23/1975	Exceptions and Brief of the Plaintiff
1/19/1976	Response of the State of Maine to New Hampshire's Exceptions
1/23/1976	Reply Brief of the Plaintiff
6/14/1976	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Motion for Entry of Judgment by Consent of Plaintiff and Defendant

No. 65, Orig., Texas v. New Mexico (1974)

File Date	Document Title
6/27/1974	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
8/28/1974	Brief of the State of New Mexico in Opposition to the Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File Complaint
10/10/1974	Memorandum for the United States
11/1/1974	Response of the State of New Mexico to the Memorandum of the United States
1/3/1975	Response of the State of Texas to New Mexico's Brief in Opposition and to the Memorandum of the United States
3/12/1975	Supplemental Memorandum for the United States
6/19/1975	Answer to the State of New Mexico
8/20/1975	Motion for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint in Intervention, and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
8/27/1975	Motion for Appointment of a Special Master
9/12/1975	Response of the State of New Mexico to the Motion of the United States of America for Leave to Intervene and File Attached Complaint in Intervention
10/9/1975	Response of the United States to the State of New Mexico's Objections to the Complaint in Intervention
1/24/1976	Report of Special Master on Motion of United States for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
6/11/1976	Response of the State of Texas to New Mexico's Affirmative Defenses
10/3/1977	Report of Special Master on his Decision and Supplemental Decision Regarding the Affirmative Defenses of New Mexico to the Complaint of Texas
10/15/1979	Report of Special Master on Obligation of New Mexico to Texas Under the Pecos River Compact
11/29/1979	New Mexico's Objections to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
11/30/1979	Objections to the Report of the Special Master on the Obligation of New Mexico to Texas Under the Pecos River Compact
12/28/1979	New Mexico's Reply to Texas's Objections
12/31/1979	Texas' Reply to New Mexico's Objections to the Master's Report on the Obligation of New Mexico to Texas Under the Pecos River Compact
2/2/1980	Memorandum of the United States
2/9/1980	Motion to Strike or for Leave to File Response and New Mexico's Response to the Memorandum of the United States
5/19/1980	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
6/3/1980	Petition for Rehearing
9/28/1982	Report and Recommendations
12/1/1982	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
12/3/1982	Exception of the United States and Supporting Memorandum
12/3/1982	Texas Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
1/5/1983	New Mexico's Reply to Texas' and the United States' Exceptions and Briefs in Support of Exceptions to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Master.
1/8/1983	Texas' Reply to the Exceptions of the United States and New Mexico
6/17/1983	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
2/27/1984	Report and Recommendations
4/12/1984	New Mexico's Motion to Remand or, in the Alternative, Exception to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Motion or Exception
5/14/1984	Texas' Reply to New Mexico's Motion to Remand or, in the Alternative, Exception to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Motion or Exception
10/6/1986	Charles J. Meyers, Special Master Report
12/18/1986	Joint Brief of Amici Curiae the Incorporated Municipalities of Alamogordo, Artesia, Capitan, Pecos, Roswell, Ruidoso, Ruidoso Downs and Santa Rosa, New Mexico in Support of the State of New Mexico
12/18/1986	Exception of the State of Texas to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support
12/20/1986	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
1/20/1987	New Mexico's Answer Brief in Response to Texas' Brief in Support of Exception
1/20/1987	Texas' Reply to New Mexico's Exceptions
1/20/1987	Brief of Amicus Curiae Red Bluff Water Power Control District in Support of the Recommendations of the Special Master
6/8/1987	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
12/7/1987	Charles J. Meyers, Special Master Report
12/7/1987	The Pecos River Master's Manual
1/27/1988	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
3/2/1988	Texas' Reply to New Mexico's Exceptions
3/11/1988	New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and Reply on Exceptions to Special Master's Report
7/23/1988	New Mexico's Motion to Stay Adoption of Pecos River Master's Final Report
8/4/1988	Texas' Response Opposing New Mexico's Motion to Stay
7/3/1989	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1988 Accounting Year 1989
7/6/1990	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1989 Accounting Year 1990
7/1/1991	Amended Decree Water Year 1990
7/26/1991	New Mexico's Motion to Review the River Master's Final Report for Water Year 1990
8/8/1991	Texas' Reply to New Mexico's Motion to Review the River Master's Final Report for Water Year 1990
8/23/1991	New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File a Reply and New Mexico's Reply to Texas' Response to New Mexico's Motion to Review the River Master's Final Report for Water Year 1990
6/2/1992	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1990 Accounting Year 1991
6/27/1994	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1992 Accounting Year 1993
6/28/1995	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1994 Accounting Year 1995
6/24/1996	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1995 Accounting Year 1996
6/30/1997	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1996 Accounting Year 1997
6/25/1998	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1997 Accounting Year 1998
6/21/1999	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1998 Accounting Year 1999
6/28/2000	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 1999 Accounting Year 2000
7/2/2001	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2000 Accounting Year 2001
6/17/2003	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2001 Accounting Year 2002
6/26/2003	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2002 Accounting Year 2003
6/21/2004	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2003 Accounting Year 2004 Final Report
7/5/2005	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2005 Accounting Year 2006 Final Report
7/7/2005	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2004 Accounting Year 2005 Final Report
7/3/2008	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2007 Accounting Year 2008 Final Report
7/6/2009	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2008 Accounting Year 2009 Final Report
7/7/2010	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2009 Accounting Year 2010
7/23/2011	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2010 Accounting Year 2011
7/11/2012	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2011 Accounting Year 2012
7/2/2013	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2012 Accounting Year 2013
7/17/2014	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2013 Accounting Year 2014
7/7/2015	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2014 Accounting Year 2015
7/28/2016	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2015 Accounting Year 2016
7/21/2017	Pecos River Compact Report of the River Master Water Year 2016 Accounting Year 2017
12/17/2018	Motion for Review of River Master's Final Determination
12/17/2018	Appendix to Motion for Review of River Master's Final Determination
4/26/2019	Reply Brief for Plaintiff
9/3/2019	Unopposed Conditional Motion for Review of River Master's 2019 Final Determination
9/3/2019	Appendix to Unopposed Conditional Motion for Review of River Master's 2019 Final Determination
12/9/2019	Brief to the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/23/2019	Response to the Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
8/27/2020	Unopposed Conditional Motion for Review of River Master's 2020 Final Determination
8/27/2020	Appendix to Conditional Motion for Review of River Master's 2020 Final Determination
12/14/2020	On Motion for Review of the River Master's Final Determination [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1987 Accounting Year 1988
N/A	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1991 Accounting Year 1992
N/A	Final Report of the River Master Water Year 1993 Accounting Year 1994

No. 66, Orig., Montgomery v. Congress of the United States (1974)

File Date	Document Title
12/19/1974	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and Brief in Support of Motion
2/25/1975	Memorandum for the Federal Defendants in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 67, Orig., Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Orego (1974)

File Date	Document Title
3/31/1975	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/11/1975	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/4/1975	State of Washington's Brief in Opposition to State of Idaho's Motion to File a Complaint
9/10/1975	Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amici
2/20/1976	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/12/1976	Plaintiff's Memorandum in Reply to Amicus Curiae Brief of United States
10/1/1976; 10/18/1976	Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae
10/1/1976	Per Curiam
4/7/1977	Defendant State of Oregon's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Motion
4/7/1977	Answer of Defendant State of Washington
4/29/1977	Memorandum in Reply to Oregon's Motion to Dismiss
8/1/1977	Answer of Defendant State of Oregon
2/24/1978	Brief of State of Oregon on Affirmative Defenses
3/5/1979	Report and Supplemental Report of Special Master on the Affirmative Defenses of Oregon and Washington to the Complaint of Idaho
4/26/1979	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
5/2/1979	Plaintiff's Exceptions to Report and Supplemental Report of Special Master on the Affirmative Defenses of Oregon and Washington to the Complaint of Idaho
6/1/1979	State of Oregon's Responses to Plaintiff's Exceptions to Master's Report
6/1/1979	Defendant State of Washington's Response to Plaintiff's Exceptions
6/4/1979	Plaintiff's Reply to Memorandum of United States as Amicus Curiae
1/21/1980	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
7/19/1982	Final Report on Merits
11/17/1982	Plaintiff, State of Idaho's Exceptions to the Master's Final Report on Merits
12/18/1982	Defendant State of Washington's Response to Idaho's Exceptions Re Master's Final Report
1/11/1983	Plaintiff State of Idaho's Reply to Washington's Response Brief
6/23/1983	On Exceptions to the Final Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 68, Orig., Pennsylvania v. New Jersey (1975)

File Date	Document Title
7/25/1975	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint and Interrogatory
9/22/1975	Proposed Amended Complaint and Brief in Support of Proposed Amended Complaint
10/25/1975	Brief in Opposition
6/17/1976	On Motions for Leave to File Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 69, Orig., Maine v. New Hampshire (1975)

File Date	Document Title
8/13/1975	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief Supporting Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/14/1975	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/17/1976	On Motions for Leave to File Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 70, Orig., Arizona v. New Mexico (1975)

File Date	Document Title
10/10/1975	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
12/8/1975	Brief in Opposition

No. 71, Orig., New York v. New Jersey (1976)

File Date	Document Title
4/14/1976	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint and Interrogatory
7/13/1976	Brief in Opposition

No. 72, Orig., South Dakota v. Nebraska (1976)

File Date	Document Title
5/12/1976	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
8/7/1976	Brief for Defendant in Opposition and Appendix
9/23/1976	Reply Brief for Plaintiff
10/29/1976	Answer
11/22/1976	Motion of Robert J. Foley, Phyllis K. Foley, and Otto Isaak for Leave to Intervene as Defendants and to File a Complaint in Intervention and Brief in Intervention as Defendants.
7/20/1977	Exception to Special Master's Report of June 8, 1977 and Brief in Opposition to Motion to Intervene
8/8/1977	Intervenor's Response to Plaintiff's Exception to Special Master's Report
8/22/1977	Brief of Defendant in Support of Report of Special Master Allowing Intervention
12/16/1977	Motion for Substitution for Deceased Party Intervenor
6/28/1982	Report of the Special Master

No. 73, Orig., California v. Nevada (1977)

File Date	Document Title
4/22/1977	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
5/20/1977	State of Nevada's Response to California's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/26/1977	Answer
2/10/1978	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of California State Assemblyman Mike Cullen, Together With Brief Amicus Curiae
3/3/1978	Defendant's Objection to Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
4/24/1978	Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Setting Forth Counterclaim and Amended Answer and Counterclaim
5/2/1978	Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Setting Forth Counterclaim and Amending Previous Answer and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
5/2/1978	Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Amended Complaint
5/15/1978	Nevada's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Setting Forth Counterclaim and Amending Previous Motion
6/23/1978	Preliminary Report of Special Master
7/20/1978	Reply to Counterclaim
7/21/1978	Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaim
10/29/1979	Report of Special Master
12/11/1979	Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Special Master's Report
12/13/1979	Nevada's Exceptions to Report of Special Master and Brief
1/10/1980	Reply Brief of Plaintiff State of California
3/13/1980	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
6/10/1980	On Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
6/1/1982	Report of Special Master

No. 74, Orig., Georgia v. South Carolina (1977)

File Date	Document Title
8/10/1977	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
8/10/1977	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/11/1977	Brief in Support of Motion to File Complaint
12/30/1977	Answer and Counterclaims
4/21/1986	First Report of Special Master
3/30/1989	Second and Final Report of Special Master
6/6/1989	Exceptions and Brief of the State of South Carolina
6/8/1989	Exceptions of the State of Georgia and Supporting Brief
6/21/1989	Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
7/3/1989	Response of the State of South Carolina to Georgia's Exceptions & Brief
7/7/1989	Memorandum for the State of Alaska as Amicus Curiae
7/8/1989	Reply Brief for the State of Georgia
10/23/1989	Motion for Leave to File Rebuttal Brief and Rebuttal Brief of the State of South Carolina
12/14/1989	Motion for Leave to File Rebuttal Brief and Rebuttal Brief of the State of Georgia
6/25/1990	On Exceptions to Reports of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
8/14/2002	[Dismissal Letter]

No. 75, Orig., Idaho v. Vance (1977)

File Date	Document Title
10/13/1977	Motion for Leave to File in Original Action
10/13/1977	Complaint
12/23/1977	Brief for the Defendants in Opposition
1/3/1978	Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Brief in Opposition, or Alternatively, for Allowance of Time to Respond

No. 76, Orig., California v. Texas (1977)

File Date	Document Title
1/13/1978	Brief in Opposition
1/13/1978	Brief in Opposition Appendix
2/6/1978	Reply to Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/22/1978	On Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 77, Orig., Tennessee v. Arkansas (1978)

File Date	Document Title
1/10/1978	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/18/1978	Response to Motion and Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/5/1978	Reply to Response to Motion and Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/29/1978	Answer of State of Arkansas to Complaint of State of Tennessee
5/4/1981	Report of Special Master

No. 78, Orig., California v. Arizona (1978)

File Date	Document Title
2/13/1978	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
4/17/1978	Brief in Opposition of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/29/1978	Response of the United States to the Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/9/1978	Reply of California in Opposition of Arizona and to Response of the United States on Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/27/1978	Reply Brief of the State of Arizona
2/22/1979	On Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]
3/30/1979	Answer of the United States
4/9/1979	Answer of the State of Arizona
7/5/1979	Amended Answer of the State of Arizona
7/5/1979	Counterclaim and Cross-Claim
9/5/1979	Answer of the United States to Arizona's Cross-Claim
9/12/1979	Amended Answer of the United States to California's Complaint
9/18/1979	Reply to Counterclaim of Defendant State of Arizona
6/15/1981	Report of the Special Master

No. 79, Orig., Oklahoma v. Arkansas (1978)

File Date	Document Title
4/19/1978	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Complaint
5/19/1978	Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Deny Leave to File Bill of Complaint
11/29/1978	Answer of State of Arkansas to Complaint of State of Oklahoma
10/1/1984	Report of Special Master
11/21/1984	Motion to Dismiss Bill of Complaint and Complaint

No. 80, Orig., Colorado v. New Mexico (1978)

File Date	Document Title
7/21/1978	Order for Appearance, Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Statement of Facts and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/13/1978	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/2/1978	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
1/24/1979	Answer and Motion to Refer to Special Master
10/20/1980	Amended Answer
2/22/1982	Report of Special Master on the Equitable Apportionment of the Vermejo River
4/6/1982	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amici Curiae and Brief Amici Curiae of Kaiser Steel Corporation, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Vermejo Park Corporation and Vermejo Conservancy District in Support of the Position of the State of New Mexico
4/8/1982	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
4/22/1982	Motion to Lengthen Oral Argument
4/23/1982	Response to Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amici Curiae
5/10/1982	Reply Brief of the State of Colorado
6/7/1982	Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief of the State of New Mexico and Reply Brief of the State of New Mexico
6/24/1982	The State of Colorado's Reply to Brief of Amici Curiae
6/24/1982	Objection to Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief of the State of New Mexico
12/13/1982	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
1/6/1983	Petition for Rehearing
6/27/1983	Additional Factual Findings
8/11/1983	Exceptions of the State of New Mexico to the Additional Factual Findings of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
9/23/1983	Colorado's Brief in Reply to the Exceptions and Brief of the State of New Mexico
10/24/1983	New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and New Mexico's Reply Brief
6/4/1984	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
6/28/1984	Petition for Rehearing

No. 81, Orig., Kentucky v. Indiana (1978)

File Date	Document Title
11/7/1978	1. Motion for Leave to File Complaint. 2. Complaint. 3. Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint.
1/5/1979	Motion for Leave to Intervene and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
1/5/1979	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
1/18/1979	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint and in Opposition of Motion for Leave to Intervene of Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc.
4/20/1979	Answer
10/1/1979	Report of Special Master
2/13/1980	Motion for Summary Adoption of the Special Master's Report and Remand to the Special Master
2/27/1980	Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Adoption of the Special Master's Report and Remand to the Special Master
2/28/1980	Motion for Leave to File Response as Amicus Curiae and Response in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Adoption of the Special Master's Report and Remand to the Special Master
3/12/1980	Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Response as Amicus Curiae and Response in Opposition to Response in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Adoption of the Special Master's Report and Remand to the Special Master
3/24/1980	Report of Special Master
11/9/1981	Motion to Intervene of Dorothy Cole, Et Al.
11/9/1981	Motion to Intervene of Dorothy Cole, Et Al.
11/19/1981	Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Intervene
5/3/1982	Report of Special Master
5/26/1982	Petition of Dorothy Cole, et al., for Rehearing on Motion to Intervene Denial
11/4/1985	Report of Special Master

No. 82, Orig., New Mexico v. Texas (1978)

File Date	Document Title
12/29/1978	Order for Appearance, Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Statement of Facts and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/9/1979	Brief in Opposition
3/9/1979	Appendix to Brief in Opposition
4/23/1979	Order for Appearance, Motion for Leave to File Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint, and Statement of Facts and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff
4/26/1979	Reply Brief
5/9/1979	Order for Appearance, Motion for Leave to File Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs, Complaint, and Statement of Facts and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs
9/7/1979	Memorandum for the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as Amici Curiae

No. 83, Orig., Maryland v. Louisiana (1979)

File Date	Document Title
3/29/1979	Motion to Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
3/29/1979	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/16/1979	Brief Amicus Curiae of American Gas Association in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/18/1979	Brief of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Florida Gas Transmission Company, Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Northern Natural Gas Company, Sea Robin Pipeline Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company a Division of Tenneco Inc., Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Trunkline Gas Company, and United Gas Pipe Line Company as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/25/1979	Brief of State of Alabama in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/25/1979	Brief Amicus Curiae of Associated Gas Distributions in Support of Plaintiffs
5/29/1979	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/12/1979	Brief for the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as Amici Curiae
8/17/1979	Answer
8/17/1979	Motion for Appointment of a Special Master
8/28/1979	Motion of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Florida Gas Transmission Company, Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Northern Natural Gas Company, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, Sea Robin Pipeline Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (a Division of Tenneco Inc.), Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Trunkline Gas Company, and United Gas Pipe Line Company for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs and to File Complaint, Brief in Support of Motion and Complaint of Intervenors
9/18/1979	Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
9/20/1979	Answer to Motion for Appointment of a Special Master
9/24/1979	Opposition to Motion for Leave to Intervene with Accompanying Brief
9/28/1979	Motion of Indicated Pipeline Companies for Leave to File Answer to Motion for Appointment of a Special Master and Answer to Motion
10/9/1979	Response of Indicated Pipeline Companies to Louisiana's Opposition to Their Motion for Leave to Intervene
10/22/1979	Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
10/22/1979	Motion on Behalf of the State of New Jersey for Leave to Intervene and for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support Thereof
10/24/1979	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Associated Gas Distributors and Brief Amicus Curiae
11/5/1979	Motion of Indicated Pipeline Companies for Leave to File and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings with Accompanying Brief
11/14/1979	Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
11/20/1979	Brief for the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as Amici Curiae
12/3/1979	Brief of State of Louisiana in Opposition to Motion of New Jersey for Leave to Intervene and to File Complaint
12/5/1979	Brief of State of Louisiana in Response to Brief of the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as Amici Curiae
4/2/1980	Motion for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs, Complaint in Intervention, and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs
6/9/1980	Report of Special Master
7/9/1980	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of Special Master, Dated May 14, 1980 and Brief in Support Thereof
8/7/1980	Response of Pipeline Companies to Louisiana's Exceptions to Special Master's Report of May 14, 1980
8/8/1980	Reply of the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of the Special Master, Dated May 14, 1980
10/6/1980	Report of the Special Master
11/14/1980	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Report of Special Master Dated September 15, 1980, and Brief in Support Thereof
11/14/1980	Motion for Leave to File Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master, Exceptions, and Brief in Support Thereof
11/18/1980	Exceptions of the Plaintiff States and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/18/1980	Exception of the United States and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Brief in Support of Exception
12/5/1980	Motion of Pipeline Companies for Leave to File Reply to Louisiana's Exceptions and Memorandum Reply
12/8/1980	Reply of State of Louisiana to Exceptions and Supporting Brief of the Plaintiff States
12/8/1980	Reply of the Plaintiff States to Louisiana's Exceptions
1/10/1981	Motion for Leave to File and Reply Brief of the Plaintiff States
1/12/1981	Motion of Pipeline Companies for Leave to File Response to Louisiana's Reply to Plaintiffs' Exceptions and Memorandum Response
5/26/1981	On Exceptions to Reports of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 84, Orig., United States v. Alaska (1979)

File Date	Document Title
5/30/1979	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Memorandum in Support of Motion
6/8/1979	Memorandum of Nonopposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/14/1979	Answer, Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim, Counterclaim, and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim
12/14/1979	Memorandum of the United States in Response to Alaska's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim and Answer to Counterclaim
5/19/1981	Motion for Leave to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention
2/21/1984	Report of Special Master on Motion of Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope and Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation for Leave to Intervene
4/22/1996	Report of the Special Master
8/5/1996	Exceptions of the State of Alaska and Supporting Brief
8/5/1996	Exception of the United States and Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
10/8/1996	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of the State of Alaska
10/10/1996	Reply Brief for the State of Alaska
10/10/1996	Brief for the States of Alabama, Arizona, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and the Virgin Islands as Amici Curiae in Support of the State of Alaska
11/12/1996	Sur-Reply Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
11/12/1996	Brief of the Wilderness Society, Sierra Club, Alaska Wilderness League, National Audubon Society, Porcupine Caribou Management Board, Alaska Center for the Environment, Northern Alaska Environmental Center and Trustees for Alaska as Amicus Curiae in Support of the United States of America
11/13/1996	Surreply Brief for the State of Alaska in Support of its Exceptions
6/19/1997	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
7/14/1997	Petition for Rehearing
6/7/2000	Joint Motion for Entry of Decree, Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion for Entry of Degree, and Proposed Decree
6/29/2000	Decree

No. 85, Orig., Texas v. Oklahoma (1979)

File Date	Document Title
11/30/1979	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
1/28/1980	Response of the State of Oklahoma to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/13/1980	Motion of Texas Power & Light Company for Leave to Intervene in Support of the State of Texas
4/14/1980	Answer
10/1/1980	Supplemental Brief of Texas Power & Light Company in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene in Support of the State of Texas
10/8/1980	Response of the State of Texas to Motion for Leave to Intervene of Texas Power & Light Company
10/27/1980	Memorandum on Private Party Intervention in Original Jurisdiction Proceedings
2/23/1981	Report of Special Master on Motion of Texas Power and Light Company to Intervene
6/1/1981	Motion for Entry of Judgment by Consent of Plaintiff and Defendant
2/22/1982	Report of Special Master on Motion for Entry of Judgment by Consent
5/28/1982	Amended Motion for Entry of Judgment by Consent of Plaintiff and Defendant

No. 86, Orig., Louisiana v. Mississippi (1979)

File Date	Document Title
12/21/1979	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Stay Order, and Brief in Support of Motion, Complaint and Application for Stay Order
12/21/1979	Appendices A, B and C to Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Stay Order, and Brief in Support of Motion, Complaint and Application for Stay Order
3/18/1980	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Application for Stay Order
6/12/1980	Answer
6/15/1983; 6/27/1983	Report of Special Master
8/20/1983	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
9/9/1983	Reply Brief for Louisiana to Exceptions of Mississippi
4/2/1984	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
4/25/1984	Petition of Avery B. Dille, Jr. for Clarification of Opinion

No. 87, Orig., California v. Texas (1981)

File Date	Document Title
2/24/1981	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Supporting Brief
2/26/1981	Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Response and Supporting Brief
2/26/1981	Motion to Intervene
2/27/1981	Order inviting the Solicitor General of the United States to file brief expressing their views (Not Printed)
3/3/1981	Plaintiff's Supplementary Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Brief, Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
3/4/1981	Brief, amicus curiae, filed by the United States (Not Printed)
3/5/1981	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae for a Better Environment, County of Santa Clara and Town of Los Gatos
3/13/1981	Motion to Defer

No. 88, Orig., California v. Texas (1981)

File Date	Document Title
3/12/1981	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/11/1981	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/11/1981	Brief in Opposition
5/22/1981	Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/9/1982	Petition for Rehearing
8/13/1982	Answer of the State of Texas
8/13/1982	Notice of Dismissal of Certain Defendants
8/16/1982	Answer of Defendants William R. Lummis and First National Bank of Nevada
8/16/1982	Answer of Defendants Avis Hughes McIntyre and T. Norton Bond, Executor of the Estate of Rush Hughes, Deceased

No. 89, Orig., California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United States (1981)

File Date	Document Title
7/7/1981	Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Original Action; Statement in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint; Complaint
7/7/1981	Exhibits in Support of California's Motion for Leave to File Complaint; Matters of Which Judicial Notice is Requested
8/14/1981	Memorandum for the United States
11/2/1981	Answer
11/2/1981	Motion of the United States for Judgment on the Pleadings and Supporting Memorandum
11/17/1981	Memorandum for the State of California ex rel. State Lands Commission in Opposition to United States' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
11/17/1981	Motion of the State of California ex rel. State Lands Commission for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum
1/15/1982	Brief for the United States
1/18/1982	Plaintiff, State of California, ex rel. State Lands Commission's Opening Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to the United States' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
2/9/1982	Reply Brief for the United States
2/22/1982	Reply Brief of Plaintiff, State of California, ex rel. State Lands Commission
3/12/1982	Supplemental Brief for the United States
3/15/1982	Brief of Amici Curiae States of Washington, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, New Mexico and Oregon
6/18/1982	On Cross Motions for Judgment [Slip Opinion]
7/12/1982	State of California's Petition for Rehearing
9/27/1982	Proposed Decree and Supporting Memorandum

No. 90, Orig., California v. Texa (1981)

File Date	Document Title
7/21/1981	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Supporting Brief
7/24/1981	Supplement to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/29/1981	Reply Brief of Plaintiff State of California
8/20/1981	First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Second Supplementary Supporting Brief
9/21/1981	Brief of Defendant Alabama in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction

No. 91, Orig., California v. West Virginia (1981)

File Date	Document Title
7/27/1981	Motion for Leave to File a Complaint with Attached Complaint
9/25/1981	Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 92, Orig., Arkansas v. Mississippi (1981)

File Date	Document Title
11/16/1981	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Complaint and Application for Stay Order
3/11/1982	Brief in Opposition for Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Application for Stay Order
6/3/1982	Answer Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim
10/6/1982	Answer to Counterclaim
2/22/1985	Stipulation
4/29/1985	Report of Special Master

No. 93, Orig., Oklahoma v. Arkansas (1982)

File Date	Document Title
5/24/1982	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
7/19/1982	Brief of Separate Defendant City of Fayetteville, Arkansas in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/23/1982	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/26/1982	Response to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
8/4/1982	Reply to Defendants' Briefs in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/22/1982	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/13/1983	Motion by the People of the State of Illinois and the People of the State of Tennessee for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae
2/14/1983	Reply to Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
2/14/1983	Brief of the People of the State of Illinois and the People of the State of Tennessee as Amici Curiae
2/28/1983	Brief in Response to Amicus Curiae Brief of the State of Illinois and Tennessee

No. 94, Orig., South Carolina v. Regan/South Carolina v. Baker (1983)

File Date	Document Title
2/9/1983	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Supporting Brief
5/5/1983	Amicus Curiae Brief of Texas, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming
5/12/1983	Brief for the Defendant in Opposition
5/18/1983	Reply Brief of Plaintiff
8/17/1983	Motion of Leave for Defendant to File Supplemental Memorandum and Supplemental Memorandum
9/9/1983	Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum and Supplemental Memorandum
9/23/1983	Motion of the National Association of Counties, the National Conference of State Legislatures, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the Council of State Governments, the Municipal Finance Officers Association, Bill Gunter, Treasurer of the State of Florida, Edward V. Regan, New York State Comptroller and the State of West Virginia for Leave to File a Brief as Amici Curiae in Support of South Carolina's Motion for Leave to File an Original Complaint and Brief as Amici Curiae in Support Thereof
10/3/1983	Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Amicus Curiae Brief
2/22/1984	On Motion for Leave to File Complaint [Slip Opinion]
6/22/1984	Motion of the National Governors' Association for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint in Intervention, and Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff
6/29/1984	Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition of National Governors' Association's Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff
6/29/1984	Brief for the Defendant in Opposition to Motion to Intervene
7/6/1984	Reply Brief of the National Governors' Association in Support of Motion to Intervene
12/10/1984	Report of Special Master on Motion of National Governors' Association for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
3/19/1985	Answer to Complaint in Intervention
5/2/1986	Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers in Support of Plaintiff State of South Carolina
2/23/1987	Report of Special Master
5/8/1987	Brief of the Government Finance Officers Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs
5/9/1987	Brief of the Public Securities Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff-In-Intervention
5/9/1987	Exceptions of the National Governors' Association to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
5/9/1987	Exceptions of the State of South Carolina to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
5/9/1987	Brief of the Amicus Curiae States of Pennsylvania, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming in Support of Plaintiff
5/26/1987	Motion for Divided and Extended Argument
7/25/1987	Brief for the Defendant
8/21/1987	Motion of the National Governors' Association for Leave to File Reply Brief and Reply Brief
4/20/1988	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
5/12/1988	Petition for Rehearing

No. 95, Orig., Arkansas v. Oklahoma (1983)

File Date	Document Title
9/30/1983	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
11/30/1983	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/19/1983	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae Out of Time and Brief of Amicus Curiae
1/6/1984	Reply to Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 96, Orig., Puerto Rico v. Iowa (1983)

File Date	Document Title
10/5/1983	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
12/2/1983	Motion for Leave to Intervene, Joint Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Joint Motion to Dismiss

No. 97, Orig., Louisiana v. Western Reserve Historical Society (1983)

File Date	Document Title
11/1/1983	Motion for Leave to File an Original Complaint, the Original Complaint, and Memorandum in Support of Motion to File an Original Complaint
12/31/1983	Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Original Complaint

No. 98, Orig., Pennsylvania v. Oklahoma (1983)

File Date	Document Title
12/19/1983	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, with Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
2/21/1984	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 99, Orig., Kostadinov v. Smith (1984)

File Date	Document Title
10/25/1984	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
1/30/1985	Brief for the Defendant in Opposition
2/7/1985	Reply Brief for the Plaintiff

No. 100, Orig., Webber v. Oklahoma (1985)

File Date	Document Title
1/28/1985	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support
3/27/1985	Joint Brief of Defendants in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Original Jurisdiction Action
4/8/1985	Brief for the Defendant State of Oklahoma in Opposition

No. 101, Orig., Pennsylvania v. Alabama (1985)

File Date	Document Title
2/28/1985	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, with Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion
4/29/1985	Brief for Defendant State of Maryland in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/23/1985	Brief of Defendant, Commonwealth of Virginia, in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/24/1985	Brief for Defendant State of Washington in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/28/1985	Brief for Defendant States of Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming, in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/7/1985	Plaintiff's Reply Brief

No. 102, Orig., Indiana v. United States (1985)

File Date	Document Title
3/5/1985	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Compaint [sic], and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/25/1985	Brief for the United States in Opposition
5/13/1985	Brief for the United States House of Representatives Defendants in Opposition

No. 103, Orig., South Dakota v. Nebraska (1985)

File Date	Document Title
8/16/1985	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/16/1985	Appendices A, B, C and D to Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/11/1985	Brief of the State of Wyoming as Amicus Curiae in Support of the State of South Dakota's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/17/1985	Brief of Defendants in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Appendix
10/29/1985	Reply Brief of South Dakota in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/26/1986	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
3/4/1986	Motion of the State of North Dakota for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, and Complaint in Intervention
3/13/1986	Memorandum of South Dakota in Response to Brief of the United States
3/19/1986	Brief in Opposition to Motion of the State of North Dakota for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff and Appendix
10/1/1986	Renewed Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/24/1986	Defendants' Joint Brief in Opposition to Renewed Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 104, Orig., New Jersey v. Nevada (1985)

File Date	Document Title
9/19/1985	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
12/16/1985	Answer of State of Nevada
12/17/1985	Answer
12/23/1985	Motion to Dismiss by Defendant, City of Las Vegas, Nevada
1/8/1986	Brief on Behalf of Plaintiff Jew Jersey in Opposition to Motion by Defendant Las Vegas to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Standing

No. 105, Orig., Kansas v. Colorado (1985)

File Date	Document Title
12/16/1985	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/14/1986	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/3/1986	Motion for Leave to File Complaint or Alternatively to Compel Compliance with Administrative Investigation Pursuant to Article VIII (H) of the Arkansas River Compact
3/3/1986	Reply Brief and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint or Alternatively to Compel Compliance with Administrative Investigation Pursuant to Article VIII (H) of the Arkansas River Compact
3/13/1986	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Alternative Relief
3/18/1986	Reply to Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Alternative Relief
5/22/1986	Colorado's Answer, Counterclaim, and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
6/11/1986	Kansas' Reply to Colorado's Counterclaim
1/28/1989	Motion to Refer Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
11/13/1989	First Amended Complaint
12/13/1989	Colorado's Answer to the First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim
10/3/1994	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Report Volume I
10/3/1994	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Report Volume II
10/3/1994	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Report Volume III
10/3/1994	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Report - Appendix (Exhibits 1-13)
11/17/1994	Kansas' Exceptions to the 1994 Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/17/1994	Colorado's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
11/17/1994	Brief of the State of Wyoming as Amicus Curiae
12/30/1994	Colorado's Reply Brief
1/3/1995	Brief of the United States in Response to the Exceptions of Kansas and Colorado
1/3/1995	Kansas' Reply Brief Opposing Colorado's Exceptions
5/15/1995	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
9/9/1997	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Second Report
11/11/1997	Colorado's Exceptions to the Second Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
12/22/1997	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of Colorado
12/22/1997	Reply Brief for Kansas Opposing the Exceptions of Colorado
8/31/2000	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Third Report
8/31/2000	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Third Report Appendix (Exhibits 1-9)
11/24/2000	Kansas' Exception and Brief in Support Thereof
11/24/2000	Colorado's Exceptions to the Third Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support Thereof
1/3/2001	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of Kansas and Colorado
1/3/2001	Colorado's Reply Brief in Opposition to Kansas' Exception to the Third Report of the Special Master
1/4/2001	Reply Brief for Kansas Opposing the Exceptions of Colorado
2/2/2001	Kansas' Reply to Brief for the United States
2/2/2001	Colorado's Reply to Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of Kansas and Colorado
6/11/2001	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
11/13/2003	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Fourth Report
1/22/2004	Kansas' Exceptions and Brief
3/22/2004	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Exceptions of Kansas
3/22/2004	Reply Brief of Colorado Opposing the Exceptions of Kansas
4/27/2004	Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply and Kansas' Sur-Reply to the United States
12/7/2004	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
2/4/2008	Arthur L. Littleworth, Special Master Fifth and Final Report Volume I
4/10/2008	Kansas' Exceptions and Brief
5/12/2008	Colorado's Reply in Opposition to Kansas' Exceptions
3/9/2009	On Exception to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Kansas' Response to Colorado's Second Motion to Stay

No. 106, Orig., Illinois v. Kentucky (1986)

File Date	Document Title
7/24/1986	1. Motion for Leave to File Complaint. 2. Complaint. 3. Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint.
9/18/1986	Defendant's Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/15/1986	Answer
10/1/1990	Report of Special Master
11/15/1990	Exceptions of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Report of the Special Master Filed October 1, 1990
12/14/1990	Brief in Response to Kentucky's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master Filed October 1, 1990
5/28/1991	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
1/17/1995	Report of the Special Master

No. 107, Orig., Michigan v. Meese (1986)

File Date	Document Title
11/13/1986	Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment
1/20/1987	Brief for the Defendant in Opposition
2/3/1987	Reply to Answer to Motion for Leave to File Complaint for Declaratory Judgment

No. 108, Orig., Nebraska v. Wyoming (1987)

File Date	Document Title
10/7/1986	Motion for Leave to File Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief, Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Petition for an OrderΓÇª
12/18/1986	Wyoming Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Petition
12/19/1986	Memorandum for the United States
1/15/1987	Reply to Wyoming's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Petition
3/19/1987	Answer of the United States
3/19/1987	Wyoming Answer to Petition, Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim and Counterclaim
3/20/1987	Motion of Platte River Trust for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff Memorandum in Support of Motion and Complaint in Intervention
3/23/1987	Motion of the National Audubon Society for Leave to Intervene or to Participate as Litigating Amicus Curiae and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene or to Participate as Litigating Amicus Curiae
4/3/1987	Nebraska's Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of the National Audubon Society for Leave to Intervene or to Participate as Litigating Amicus Curiae
4/3/1987	Nebraska's Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of Platte River Trust for Leave to Intervene
4/3/1987	Wyoming Memorandum in Opposition to Platte River Trust and National Audubon Society Motions for Leave to Intervene
4/3/1987	Colorado Response to Platte River Trust and National Audubon Society Motions for Leave to Intervene
4/3/1987	Colorado Response to Platte River Trust and National Audubon Society Motions for Leave to Intervene
4/10/1987	Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion by the Platte River Trust for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
4/13/1987	Motion of Basin Electric Power Cooperative for Leave to Intervene Memorandum in Support of Motion and Answer
4/14/1987	Wyoming Memorandum in Opposition to Basin Electric Power Cooperative Motion for Leave to Intervene
4/15/1987	Joint Motion of Nebraska Public Power District and the Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District for Leave to File a Joint Complaint in Intervention and for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs, Joint Complaint in Intervention, and Brief in Support of Joint Motion for Leave to File a Joint Complaint in Intervention and for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs
4/22/1987	Basin Electric Power Cooperative's Reply Memorandum to Wyoming's Memorandum in Opposition to Basin's Motion for Leave to Intervene
4/28/1987	Wyoming Memorandum in Opposition to Joint Motion of Nebraska Public Power District and Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District for Leave to File a Joint Complaint in Intervention and for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs
5/14/1987	Reply of Nebraska Public Power District and Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District to Wyoming Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File a Joint Complaint in Intervention and for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs
6/19/1987	Nebraska's Answer to Wyoming's Counterclaims
1/13/1988	Motion to Amend Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief, Amended Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree, for Injunctive Relief, and for Modification of Decree, and Brief in Support of Motion to Amend PetitionΓÇª
2/12/1988	Memorandum for the United States
2/12/1988	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion to Amend Petition
2/13/1988	Wyoming Brief in Opposition to Motion to Amend Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief
2/13/1988	Motion of the State of Wyoming for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support of Motion
2/16/1988	Basin Electric's Motion for Leave to File a Response in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion to Amend Petition and Response in Opposition
3/3/1988	Nebraska's Reply Brief to Briefs and the Memorandum Filed in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion to Amend Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree, for Injunctive Relief, and for Modification of Decree
6/26/1989	Owen Olpin, Special Master First Interim Report
10/10/1991	Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims, Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims, and Brief in Support of Motion for Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
11/12/1991	Wyoming's Brief in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition for Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
11/12/1991	Motion of Basin Electric Power Cooperative for Leave to File Memorandum in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition and Proposed Memorandum
11/12/1991	Motion of the Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District for Leave to File a Response Amicus Curiae in Support of the Motion of the State of Nebraska for Leave to File Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims and Memorandum in Support Thereof and Response Amicus Curiae in Support of the Motion of the State of Nebraska for Leave to File Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
11/12/1991	Brief of Amicus Curiae Platte River Trust in Support of Nebraska's Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
11/12/1991	Brief of Amicus Curiae National Audubon Society in Support of Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition for an Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and Assertion of New Claims
11/12/1991	Brief for the United States in Opposition
11/12/1991	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition for Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
11/26/1991	Nebraska's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion of Basin Electric for Leave to File Memorandum in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition and Proposed Memorandum
11/26/1991	Nebraska's Reply to Wyoming's, Colorado's, and the United States' Briefs in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition for Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
2/6/1992	Motion of Amicus Curiae National Audubon Society for Leave to File a Brief in Support of Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition
2/10/1992	Cautionary Motion of Amicus Curiae Platte River Trust for Leave to File Memorandum in Support of Nebraska's Amended Petition for Apportionment of Non-Irrigation Season Flows and for the Assertion of New Claims
4/15/1992	Owen Olpin, Special Master Second Interim Report on Motions for Summary Judgment and Renewed Motions for Intervention
6/30/1992	Exceptions of the State of Wyoming to the First and Second Interim Reports of the Special Master and Brief in Support
7/1/1992	Colorado's Exception to the Special Master's First and Second Interim Reports
7/1/1992	Exceptions of Basin Electric Power Cooperative to Second Interim Report of Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
7/1/1992	Nebraska's Exceptions to the First and Second Interim Reports of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
8/14/1992	Brief of the State of Wyoming in Reply to Nebraska's Exceptions to the First and Second Interim Reports of the Special Master
8/14/1992	Basin Electric Power Cooperative's Reply to Nebraska's Brief in Support of Exceptions to the First and Second Interim Reports of the Special Master
8/17/1992	Brief for the United States Opposing Exceptions
8/17/1992	Reply Brief of National Audubon Society and Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust
8/17/1992	Nebraska's Response to Wyoming's, Colorado's, and Basin Electric's Exceptions to the Special Master's First and Second Interim Reports and Briefs in Support of Exceptions
9/16/1992	Wyoming Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief and Wyoming Brief in Reply to Brief for the United States Opposing Exceptions
10/9/1992	Nebraska's Motion for Leave to File Her Sur-Reply to Wyoming's Reply to the United States' Brief Opposing Exceptions and Brief in Support of Motion
4/20/1993	On Petition for Order Enforcing Decree and for Injunctive Relief
2/18/1994	Joint Motion to Refer Motions for Leave to File Amended Pleadings to the Special Master for His Recommendations
2/18/1994	Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition, Amended Petition for an Order Enforcing Decree, for Injunctive Relief, and for Modification of the Decree to Specify an Apportionment of the Natural Flows of the Laramie River Below Wheatland and to Apportion the Unapportioned Natural Flows of the North Platte River, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition
2/18/1994	Wyoming Motion for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims and Cross-Claims, Amended Counterclaims and Cross-Claims, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims and Cross-Claims
3/16/1994	Brief for the United States
10/11/1994	Owen Olpin, Special Master Third Interim Report on Motions to Amend the Pleadings
11/22/1994	Nebraska's Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master on Motions to Amend the Pleadings and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/25/1994	Exception of the United States and Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
11/25/1994	Exceptions of the State of Wyoming to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support
12/23/1994	Colorado's Reply Brief
12/29/1994	Nebraska's Response to Wyoming's Exceptions to the Special Master's Third Interim Report
12/29/1994	Brief of the State of Wyoming in Response to Exceptions of the State of Nebraska and the United States to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master
12/29/1994	Brief for the United States Opposing Exceptions of the State of Wyoming
12/30/1994	Motion of Basin Electric Power Cooperative for Leave to File and Memorandum in Response to Certain Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master
12/30/1994	Motion of Amicus Curiae Platte River Trust for Leave to File a Response to Wyoming's Second Exception to the Special Master's Third Interim Report and Proposed Response
1/30/1995	Wyoming Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief and Wyoming Reply Brief in Support of Wyoming's Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master
2/9/1995	Nebraska's Response to Wyoming Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief and Wyoming Reply Brief in Support of Wyoming's Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master
5/30/1995	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
11/13/2001	Final Report of the Special Master
11/13/2001	Proposed Joint Settlement
11/18/2011	Joint Motion to Amend Modified Decree

No. 109, Orig., Oklahoma v. New Mexico (1987)

File Date	Document Title
4/16/1987	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/25/1987	New Mexico's Brief in Opposition to the Oklahoma and Texas Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/4/1987	New Mexico's Answer
11/18/1988	Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and Supplemental Complaint
11/30/1988	New Mexico's Response to Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint
1/7/1989	New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer, Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer, and Supplemental Answer
1/19/1989	Oklahoma and Texas' Response in Opposition to New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer
1/26/1989	New Mexico's Reply on Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer
11/5/1990	Jerome C. Muys, Special Master Report
12/20/1990	Exceptions of the State of Texas to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
12/20/1990	New Mexico's Exceptions to the Special Master's Report
12/20/1990	Exception of the State of Oklahoma to Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support
1/22/1991	New Mexico's Reply to Texas' and Oklahoma's Exceptions to Report of Special Master
1/22/1991	Reply of the State of Oklahoma to New Mexico's Exceptions to Special Master's Report and Brief in Support
1/22/1991	Reply of the State of Texas to Exceptions of New Mexico and Brief in Support of Reply
6/17/1991	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
7/12/1991	New Mexico's Petition for Rehearing
5/28/1993	Report on Remanded Ute Reservoir Sediment Control Issue and Recommendation for Entry of the Parties' Stipulated Judgment and Decree
5/28/1993	Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment and Decree
11/19/1993	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/13/1993	Stipulated Judgment, as Modified

No. 110, Orig., Matter of Republic of Suriname ex Rel. Boerenveen (1987)

File Date	Document Title
9/4/1987	Motion, Petition, Brief and Appendix
10/30/1987	Brief for the United States in Opposition
11/24/1987	Reply of Republic of Suriname to Brief for the United States in Opposition

No. 111, Orig., Delaware v. New York (1988)

File Date	Document Title
2/9/1988	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/9/1988	Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/9/1988	Brief of States of Pennsylvania, Florida, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Arizona, Utah and Arkansas as Amici Curiae in Support of the Plaintiff
5/9/1988	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/19/1988	Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/27/1988	Answer
1/7/1989	Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief of the State of Texas in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
2/13/1989	Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Motion of the State of Texas to Intervene
4/19/1989	Motion of the State of Idaho for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; and Complaint in Intervention
4/20/1989	Motion of the State of Arizona for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention
4/21/1989	Motion of the State of Connecticut for Leave to Intervene
4/21/1989	Motion of the States of Alabama, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah and Washington, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
4/21/1989	Appendix to the Brief of the States of Alabama, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah and Washington, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
4/21/1989	Answer by the State of New York to Complaint of the State of Texas
4/24/1989	Answer of the Plaintiff, the State of Delaware, to the Complaint in Intervention of the State of Texas
4/24/1989	Motion of the State of New Mexico for Leave to Intervene
4/25/1989	Motion of the State of Tennessee for Leave to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention
5/5/1989	Motion of the State of Wisconsin for Leave to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention
5/11/1988	Documents Lodged with the Clerk
5/11/1989	Motion of the Commonwealth of Virginia for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint and Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint
5/12/1989	Motion of the District of Columbia to Intervene; Complaint in Intervention; and Memorandum in Support
5/17/1989	Reply of the State of Texas to the Motion of the States of Alabama [et al.], and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention and the Motion of the States of Arizona [et al.] for Leave to Intervene
5/17/1989	Response of the State of Delaware to the Applications for Leave to Intervene Filed by the States of Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Washington, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania
5/18/1989	Brief in Opposition to Motions for Leave to Intervene
5/26/1989	Motion for Judgment of the Pleadings Against the State of Texas
5/26/1989	Reply of the States of AlabamaΓÇªand Washington, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania to the State of New York's Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
6/1/1989	Reply of State of Arizona to State of New York's Opposition to Motion to Intervene
6/7/1989	Statement of the State of Delaware in Support of the Relief Sought by the State of New York's Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings Against the State of Texas
9/20/1989	Motion of the State of North Carolina for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint
10/12/1989	Motion of the State of Texas for Leave to File Amended Complaint in Intervention
10/16/1989	Report of the Special Master on Motions to Intervene
11/13/1989	Motion of the State of Minnesota for Leave to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention
11/17/1989	Motion of the States of California, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, and Rhode Island for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
11/17/1989	Motion of the States of Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire and West Virginia for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
11/17/1989	Appendix to the Brief of the States of Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire and West Virginia in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
11/20/1989	Motion of the State of Colorado for Leave to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention
7/16/1990	Motion of the States of New Jersey, North Dakota and Wyoming for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
9/21/1990	Motion of the State of South Carolina for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint
10/29/1990	Motion of the States of Alaska and Vermont for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
10/30/1990	Motion of the State of Maryland for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
6/3/1991	Motion of the States of Georgia and Maine for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; Complaint in Intervention; Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
8/29/1991	Motion of the State of Oregon for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and Adopt Complaint
1/29/1992	Report of Special Master
4/2/1992	Motion of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention and Complaint in Intervention
4/2/1992	Brief of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
5/26/1992	Exceptions and Brief in Support for Plaintiff, State of Delaware
5/26/1992	Statement of the Plaintiff-Intervenor States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming, the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania and the State of California in Support of the Report of the Special Master
5/26/1992	Exceptions of the State of New York to the Report of the Special Master
5/26/1992	Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amici Curiae and Brief of Amici Curiae of Midwest Securities Trust Company and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company in Support of Neither Party
5/26/1992	Exceptions of the State of Michigan, Maryland, and Nebraska, and the District of Columbia to the Report of the Special Master
5/26/1992	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Response to the Report of the Special Master and Brief of Amici Curiae
7/24/1992	Reply Brief of the Plaintiff-Intervenor States of Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin and the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Exceptions of the States of Delaware and New York
7/27/1992	Brief for Plaintiff, State of Delaware, in Response to Exceptions and Briefs of Putative Intervenors, States of Michigan, Maryland and Nebraska and the District of Columbia, and of Defendant, State of New York
7/27/1992	Brief for the Plaintiff-Intervenor States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming, the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania, and the State of California in Response to Exceptions of the States of Delaware and New York to the Report of the Special Master
7/27/1992	Reply of the State of New York to the Exceptions and Brief of the State of Delaware and the Exceptions of the States of Michigan, Et Al.
7/27/1992	Reply of the States of Michigan, Maryland, and Nebraska, and the District of Columbia to the Exceptions of the States of Delaware and New York to the Report of the Special Master
8/20/1992	Motion for Leave to File Brief in Reply for Plaintiff, State of Delaware, and Brief for Plaintiff, State of Delaware, In Reply to the Briefs of the Texas Group Intervenors
8/31/1992	Opposition and Reply Brief for the Plaintiff-Intervenor States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming, the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania, and the State of California in Response to Motion of the State of Delaware for Leave to File Brief in Reply to the Reply Briefs of the Plaintiff-Intervenor States and Accompanying Brief in Reply
8/31/1992	Motion for Leave to File Brief of the State of New York in Reply to the Briefs of the States of Texas, Et Al., and Alabama, Et Al., and Delaware, and Brief of the State of New York
12/28/1992	Motion of the State of New York for Leave to File First Amended Answers and Leave to File Counterclaims
1/4/1993	Response of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Motion of Defendant, State of New York, for Leave to File amended Answers and Leave to File Counterclaims
1/11/1993	Response by Texas, Et Al., and Michigan, Et Al., in Opposition to New York's Motion to Amend and File Counterclaims
3/30/1993	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
7/1/1993	Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Introduction to First Amended Complaint and First Amended Complaint
7/7/1993	Amended Complaint in Intervention of the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania
7/7/1993	Amended Complaint in Intervention of the State of California
7/7/1993	Amended Complaint in Intervention of the States of Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Virginia
7/8/1993	Amended Complaint of the States of Michigan, Maryland and Nebraska
7/8/1993	Amended Complaint by the District of Columbia
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Amended Complaint by the District of Columbia
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Amended Complaint in Intervention of the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Pennsylvania
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Amended Complaint of the States of Michigan, Maryland and Nebraska
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Amended Complaint in Intervention of the State of California
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' First Amended Complaint
8/9/1993	Answer of the State of New York to the Amended Complaint in Intervention of the States of Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Virginia
8/9/1993	Motion of the Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Strike Amended Complaints in Intervention
8/16/1993	Response to the State of New York to Motion of the State of Delaware to Strike Amended Complaints
8/23/1993	Opposition of Plaintiff-Intervenor States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Virginia to Motion of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Strike Amended Complaints in Intervention
8/23/1993	Response to Intervenor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts to Motion of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Strike Amended Complaints in Intervention
8/26/1993	Response of the States of Michigan, Maryland and Nebraska and the District of Columbia to the Motion of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Strike Amended Complaints in Intervention
9/1/1993	Reply Brief in Support of Motion of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Strike Amended Complaints in Intervention
10/29/1993	Motion of the State of New York for Leave to File Counterclaims
11/9/1993	Response of Plaintiff, State of Delaware, to Motion of Defendant, State of New York, for Leave to File Counterclaims
12/1/1993	Response of Plaintiff-Intervenor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to Motion of Defendant, State of New York, for Leave to File Counterclaims
12/1/1993	OOpposition of Plaintiff-Intervenors States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia to Motion of the State of New York for Leave to File Counterclaims
5/9/1994	Exceptions of Plaintiff-Intervenors States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Virginia and the District of Columbia
5/23/1994	Brief for Plaintiff, State of Delaware, in Response to Exceptions of Intervening Plaintiff States of Alabama, Et Al.

No. 112, Orig., Wyoming v. Oklahoma (1988)

File Date	Document Title
4/14/1988	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Supporting Brief
6/10/1988	Motion of Alabama Power Company, a Corporation, for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Amicus Curiae Brief
6/10/1988	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/13/1988	Motion of Wyoming Mining Association for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Brief in Support of Motion of State of Wyoming for Leave to File Complaint
8/29/1988	Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of the Motion to Dismiss
9/29/1988	Response to Motion to Dismiss
11/30/1988	Answer of the State of Oklahoma
10/1/1990	Report of Special Master
4/2/1991	Amicus Curiae Brief of the Wyoming Mining Association Supporting the State of Wyoming
4/2/1991	Corrected Exceptions of the State of Wyoming to the Report of the Special Master
5/16/1991	Brief on the Merits for the State of Oklahoma
5/16/1991	Appendix to Brief on the Merits for the State of Oklahoma
6/6/1991	The State of Wyoming's Reply to the State of Oklahoma's Brief
1/22/1992	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 113, Orig., Mississippi v. United States (1988)

File Date	Document Title
4/29/1988	Complaint and Statement in Support of Complaint
6/13/1988	Answer of the United States
10/1/1990	Report of Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Special Master
11/5/1990	Decree

No. 114, Orig., Louisiana v. Mississippi (1988)

File Date	Document Title
9/15/1988	Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Application for Stay Order, and Brief in Support of Motion, Complaint and Application for Stay Order
11/4/1988	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
2/2/1989	Petition for Rehearing by the State of Louisiana of its Motion to File Complaint; And Alternative Motion to File Separate Complaint

No. 115, Orig., Arkansas v. Oklahoma (1988)

File Date	Document Title
9/29/1988	Motion for Leave to File Complaint with Complaint and with Brief in Support of Motion
11/28/1988	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/28/1988	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/13/1988	Brief in Response to Brief of State of Oklahoma in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint and to Amicus Curiae Brief of the United States

No. 116, Orig., Alabama v. W.R. Grace & Co. (1990)

File Date	Document Title
1/30/1990	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/2/1990	Motion of the State of New Jersey to Intervene as a Party Plaintiff and Brief in Support of Motion
4/10/1990	Joint Brief of Defendants American Biltrate Inc., Azrock Industries Inc., Basic Incorporated, Carey Canada, Inc., The Celetox Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, The Flintkote Company, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, H.K. Porter Company, Inc., Kentile Floors, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Pfizer Inc., Turner & Newall, PLC, United States Gypsum Company and USG Corporation in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/10/1990	Brief of Defendant Keene Corporation in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/12/1990	Lodging Submitted Defendant GAF Corporation
4/12/1990	Brief of Defendant GAF Corporation in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint and in Opposition to New Jersey's Motion to Intervene
4/12/1990	Brief of Defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc. in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/12/1990	Brief of Defendant Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/12/1990	Brief of Defendant W.R. Grace & Company in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/12/1990	Brief for Defendant Armstrong World Industries, Inc., in Opposition
4/12/1990	Brief of Defendant National Gypsum Company in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/24/1990	Reply Brief of Plaintiff States

No. 117, Orig., Mississippi v. United States (1990)

File Date	Document Title
11/21/1990	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
2/21/1991	Brief for the United States in Opposition
4/12/1991	Petition for Rehearing

No. 118, Orig., United States v. Alaska (1990)

File Date	Document Title
1/7/1991	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
3/14/1991	Memorandum of State of Alaska
5/31/1991	Answer
9/6/1991	Joint Stipulation of Facts
10/21/1991	Motion for Summary Judgment Brief of State of Alaska
10/21/1991	Motion of the United States for Summary Judgment and Brief for the United States in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
10/21/1991	Brief Amicus Curiae of the States of: Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington, Joined by the Coastal States Organization in Support of Defendant
11/20/1991	Reply Brief of the State of Alaska in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment
11/20/1991	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Motion of the State of Alaska for Summary Judgment
4/21/1992	On Bill of Complaint [Slip Opinion]

No. 119, Orig., Connecticut v. New Hampshire (1991)

File Date	Document Title
10/30/1991	Motion for Leave to File Complaint and Complaint
12/27/1991	Brief of Amici Curiae New England Council and Associated Industries of Massachusetts in Support of Motion
12/30/1991	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
1/10/1992	Reply Brief of the State of Connecticut, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the State of Rhode Island in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/25/1992	Answer of Defendant State of New Hampshire
3/27/1992	Motion on Behalf of the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel for Leave to Intervene, for Leave to File Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene
4/9/1992	Response by the State of New Hampshire to the Motion of the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel for Leave to Intervene and for Leave to File a Complaint
4/16/1992	Motion for Leave to Intervene, Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene, and Complaint of Intervenors
4/29/1992	Response by the State of New Hampshire to the Motion of Certain Electric Utilities for Leave to Intervene and Leave to File a Complaint
5/13/1992	Reply Brief of United Illuminating Co., Et Al., in Support of Motion to Intervene
6/15/1992	Vincent L. McKusick, Special Master First Interim Report With Recommendations on Motions to Intervene
7/1/1992	Answer of Defendant State of New Hampshire to the Complaint of the Utility Intervenors
1/15/1993	Final Report of the Special Master
2/19/1993	Supplement to the Final Report of the Special Master
3/15/1993	Exceptions and Brief in Support for Intervenors
3/15/1993	Exceptions of the State of New Hampshire and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/6/1993	Plaintiff States' Reply Brief to Exceptions of the State of New Hampshire
4/7/1993	Reply Brief for the State of New Hampshire
4/7/1993	Reply Brief for Intervenors
N/A	Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 120, Orig., New Jersey v. New York (1993)

File Date	Document Title
4/26/1993	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
6/24/1993	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/23/1993	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
9/15/1993	Motion for Leave to File Sur Reply Brief and Sur Reply Brief for Defendant State of New York
2/18/1994	Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
4/28/1994	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
5/11/1994	Second Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
7/15/1994	Answer
5/30/1997	Supplement to Final Report of the Special Master
7/30/1997	Brief for the City of New York, as Amicus Curiae, in Support of the State of New York's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
7/31/1997	Exceptions of the State of New York to the Report of the Special Master
7/31/1997	Exceptions of the State of New Jersey and Brief for the State of New Jersey in Support of Exceptions
7/31/1997	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of the Exceptions of the State of New York and Brief of Amici Curiae
7/31/1997	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of the Exceptions of the State of New York and Brief of Amici Curiae
7/31/1997	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of the Exceptions of the State of New York and Brief of Amici Curiae
8/29/1997	Reply of the State of New York to Exceptions of the State of New Jersey to the Report of the Special Master
8/29/1997	Reply Brief of the State of New Jersey in Opposition to the Exceptions of the State of New York
9/2/1997	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Partial Opposition to Exceptions
9/15/1997	Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply Brief in Support of Exceptions and Sur-Reply Brief in Support of Exceptions
10/29/1997	Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Brief of Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae Western Mohegan Tribe & Nation of New York in Support of Neither Party
12/17/1997	Petition for Rehearing of Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Brief of Amicus Curiae Western Mohegan Tribe & Nation of New York, Pro Se, in Support of Neither Party
5/26/1998	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
6/19/1998	Petition for Rehearing
4/15/1999	Report of the Special Master Upon Recommittal

No. 121, Orig., Louisiana v. Mississippi (1993)

File Date	Document Title
8/6/1993	Motion to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion and Complaint
10/4/1993	Answer of the State of Mississippi to the Motion of the State of Louisiana to File Complaint
10/4/1993	Answer of the Houston Group to the Motion of the State of Louisiana to File Complaint
12/1/1993	Answer of Defendant State of Mississippi
12/1/1993	Answer of Defendants Julia Donelson Ehrhardt, Formerly Julia Donelson Houston, Ruth Houston Baker and Hines H. Baker, Co-Executors and Co-Trustees of the Estate of George T. Houston, A/K/A George T. Houston, III, Deceased, and Ruth Houston Baker, Individually
2/7/1994	Answer of Plaintiff State of Louisiana to Counterclaim of the State of Mississippi
8/16/1994	Motion of the Houston Defendants for Leave to File Supplemental Answer and Supplemental Answer
10/24/1994	Final Report of the Special Master
1/13/1995	Exceptions of the State of Louisiana to the Final Report of the Special Master and Petition for New Trial of the Supplemental Hearing
2/22/1995	Joint Response of Mississippi and the Houston Group to the Exceptions of the State of Louisiana
10/31/1995	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 122, Orig., Texas v. Louisiana (1995)

File Date	Document Title
7/14/1995	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint; Bill of Complaint; Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and Brief in Support of Both Motions

No. 123, Orig., Corrinet v. Boutros Ghali (1995)

File Date	Document Title
10/3/1995	Complaint and Original Proceeding to Enforce Duties Under the 1946 General Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, 1 Unts 15 (1946)
10/3/1995	Motion for Leave to Proceed as an Original Proceeding and Brief in Support Thereof

No. 124, Orig., Collins v. Alabama (1996)

File Date	Document Title
8/21/1996	Motion for Leave to File Complaint with Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion

No. 125, Orig., Republic of Paraguay v. Gilmore (1998)

File Date	Document Title
2/24/1998	Petition for Writ of Certiorari
3/26/1998	Brief of Amici Curiae for the Human Rights Committee of the American Branch of the International Law Association and the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights in Support of Petitioners
3/26/1998	Brief of Amici Curiae Republic of Argentina, Republic of Brazil, Republic of Ecuador, and Republic of Mexico in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
4/13/1998	Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint, Complaint, and Memorandum in Support
4/13/1998	Motion and Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York
4/13/1998	Reply to the Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/14/1998	Per Curiam
N/A	Supplemental Application for Stay of or Injunction Against Execution
N/A	Motion for Leave to File Statement Amicus Curiae of International Law Professors George A. Bermann, David D. Caron, Abram Chayes, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Richard N. Gardner, Louis Henkin, Harold Hongju Koh, Andreas F. Lowenfeld, W. Michael Reisman, Oscar Schachter, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Edith Brown Weiss in Support of Petitioners' Supplemental Application for Stay of or Injunction Against Execution
N/A	Statement Amicus Curiae of International Law Professors George A. Bermann, David D. Caron, Abram Chayes, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Richard N. Gardner, Louis Henkin, Harold Hongju Koh, Andreas F. Lowenfeld, W. Michael Reisman, Oscar Schachter, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Edith Brown Weiss in Support of Petitioners' Supplemental Application for Stay of or Injunction Against Execution
N/A	Respondents' Supplemental Opposition
N/A	Application for Stay of or Injunction Against Execution Pending Disposition of Petition for Writ of Certiorari
N/A	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae

No. 126, Orig., Kansas v. Nebraska (1998)

File Date	Document Title
5/26/1998	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
7/24/1998	Brief of the State of Nebraska and Request for Oral Argument in Opposition to Kansas' Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
8/7/1998	Kansas' Reply to Nebraska's Brief in Opposition and to Nebraska's Request for Oral Argument
8/20/1998	Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Kansas' Reply to Nebraska's Brief in Opposition and Sur-Reply
9/2/1998	Kansas' Response to Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply
12/18/1998	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/18/1998	Lodging
12/18/1998	Lodging USGS Circular No. 1139
1/5/1999	Nebraska's Reply to Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
3/19/1999	Answer of the State of Colorado
4/19/1999	Answer and Counterclaim of the State of Nebraska
5/14/1999	Colorado's Answer to Nebraska's Counterclaims
5/21/1999	Kansas' Motion to Strike Nebraska's Counterclaims, Brief in Support, and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
6/2/1999	State of Nebraska's Brief in Opposition to Kansas' Motion to Strike Nebraska's Counterclaim and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
6/9/1999	Kansas' Reply in Support of Motion to Strike and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
7/21/1999	Kansas' Reply to Nebraska's Counterclaims
8/2/1999	Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
9/10/1999	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss
9/10/1999	Kansas' Brief in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion to Dismiss
9/17/1999	Colorado's Response to Nebraska's Motion to Dismiss
9/21/1999	[Affidavit of Douglas R. Littlefield, Ph.D.]
9/29/1999	Nebraska's Brief in Response to Briefs of Kansas and United States in Opposition to Nebraska's Motion to Dismiss
1/28/2000	Transcript of Hearing on Motion to Dismiss Before the Honorable Vincent McKusick, Special Master
1/28/2000	First Report of the Special Master (Subject: Nebraska's Motion to Dismiss)
4/6/2000	Exceptions to the First Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/7/2000	Colorado's Exception to the First Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exception
6/1/2000	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Exceptions to the First Report of the Special Master
6/1/2000	Reply Brief for Kansas Opposing the Exceptions of Nebraska and Colorado
7/31/2000	Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Cross-Claim, First Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Cross-Claim, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Cross-Claim
9/15/2000	Pre-Conference Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/16/2003	Final Settlement Stipulation Volume 1 of 5
4/16/2003	Final Settlement Stipulation Volume 2 of 5
4/16/2003	Final Settlement Stipulation Volume 3 of 5
4/16/2003	Final Settlement Stipulation Volume 4 of 5
4/16/2003	Final Settlement Stipulation Volume 5 of 5
4/16/2003	Second Report of the Special Master (Subject: Final Settlement Stipulation)
5/19/2003	Decree
9/23/2003	Final Report of the Special Master with Certificate of Adoption of RRCA Groundwater Model
5/3/2010	Motion for Leave to File Petition, Petition, and Brief in Support
7/1/2010	Brief of the State of Nebraska in Response to Kansas' Motion for Leave to File Petition
7/6/2010	State of Colorado's Response to the State of Kansas' Motion for Leave to File Petition
7/20/2010	Kansas' Reply
2/28/2011	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
11/15/2013	Report of the Special Master
11/15/2013	Appendices to Report of the Special Master
2/27/2014	Exceptions by Plaintiff State of Kansas to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
2/27/2014	Colorado's Exception to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exception
2/27/2014	Nebraska's Exceptions and Brief in Support
3/31/2014	Colorado's Reply in Opposition to Kansas' Exceptions
3/31/2014	Nebraska's Brief in Reply to Exceptions by Kansas
3/31/2014	Reply of Plaintiff State of Kansas
4/2/2014	Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Overruling the Parties' Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
4/28/2014	Nebraska's Sur-Reply on Exceptions to Plaintiff's Response
4/30/2014	Colorado's Sur-Reply in Support of Its Exceptions
4/30/2014	Sur-Reply of Plaintiff State of Kansas
N/A	Lodging USGS Circular No. 1139

No. 127, Orig., Federal Republic of Germany v. United States (1999)

File Date	Document Title
3/3/1999	Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and for a Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction, Complaint, and Memorandum in Support
3/3/1999	Plaintiff's Reply to the United States
3/3/1999	On Application for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction and on Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint

No. 128, Orig., Alaska v. United States (1999)

File Date	Document Title
11/24/1999	Alaska's Motion for Leave to File a Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
4/12/2000	Brief for the United States
4/25/2000	Reply Brief for Plaintiff
8/24/2000	Answer
12/14/2000	Alaska's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
12/20/2000	Memorandum for the United States
2/7/2001	Answer to Amended Complaint
2/22/2001	Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
4/4/2001	Brief for the United States in Opposition
4/4/2001	Opposition of Plaintiff State of Alaska to Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
4/18/2001	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
1/14/2002	Report of the Special Master on the Motion to Intervene by Franklin H. James, the Shakan Kwaan Thling-Git Nation, Joseph K. Samuel, and the Taanta Kwaan Thling-Git Nation
4/26/2004	Report of the Special Master on Six Motions for Partial Summary Judgment and One Motion for Confirmation of a Disclaimer of Title
7/12/2004	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support for Plaintiff State of Alaska
9/10/2004	Reply Brief of the United States in Response to Exceptions of the State of Alaska
9/10/2004	Brief of National Parks Conservation Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant United States of America with Respect to Count IV-Glacier Bay
10/8/2004	Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply and Sur-Reply Brief for Plaintiff State of Alaska
10/18/2004	Reply of the United States in Opposition to the Motion of the State of Alaska for Leave to File a Sur-Reply Brief
10/21/2004	Reply in Support of Motion of Plaintiff State of Alaska for Leave to File a Sur-Reply
6/6/2005	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
1/23/2006	Decree

No. 129, Orig., Virginia v. Maryland (2000)

File Date	Document Title
2/18/2000	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Brief in Support of Motion, and Bill of Complaint
2/18/2000	Appendix
4/21/2000	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
4/21/2000	Motion of the Audubon Naturalist Society for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief Opposing the Commonwealth of Virginia's Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and Amicus Curiae Brief of the Audubon Naturalist Society
4/24/2000	Brief Amicus Curiae of Loudoun County, Virginia, of Loudoun County Sanitation Authority and Prince William County Service Authority in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
5/2/2000	Reply Brief
7/31/2000	Maryland's Answer, Counterclaim, and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
8/24/2000	Answer to Counterclaim and Response to Motion for Appointment of Special Master
1/12/2001	Motion of the Audubon Naturalist Society for Review of the Special Master's Finding of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
1/26/2001	State of Maryland's Response to Motion of the Audubon Naturalist Society for Review of the Special Master's Finding of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
1/30/2001	Virginia's Opposition to the Motion of the Audubon Naturalist Society for Review of the Special Master's Finding of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Request for Costs
2/14/2001	Reply Brief of the Audubon Naturalist Society Seeking Review of the Special Master's Finding of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
3/16/2001	Motion for Leave to File an Amendment to Maryland's Answer and Counterclaim, and Amendment to Answer and Counterclaim
12/9/2002	Report of the Special Master
12/9/2002	Report of the Special Master Appendices
2/27/2003	Exceptions of the State of Maryland to the Report of the Special Master
2/27/2003	Appendix to Exceptions of the State of Maryland to the Report of the Special Master
2/27/2003	Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae Audubon Naturalist Society and Brief of Audubon Naturalist Society in Support of State of Maryland
3/31/2003	Reply by the Commonwealth of Virginia to the State of Maryland's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
3/31/2003	Brief of Amicus Curiae Loudoun County Sanitation Authority in Support of Reply by the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Exceptions of the State of Maryland to the Report of the Special Master
4/3/2003	Lodging Accompanying Reply by the Commonwealth of Virginia to the State of Maryland's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
12/9/2003	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 130, Orig., New Hampshire v. Maine (2000)

File Date	Document Title
3/6/2000	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/6/2000	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint and Brief in Support of Motion and Complaint
5/11/2000	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/30/2000	Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/24/2000	Appendix to State of Maine's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Volume I - Pages 70a to 302a
8/24/2000	Appendix to State of Maine's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Volume II - Pages 303a to 521a
8/25/2000	Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
10/10/2000	Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
10/20/2000	Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
12/19/2000	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/3/2001	Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/3/2001	Appendix to Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/22/2001	Defendant's Reply Brief to New Hampshire's Brief in Response to Brief for the United States
4/3/2001	New Hampshire's Map Lodging for Oral Argument
5/29/2001	On Motion to Dismiss Complaint [Slip Opinion]
6/25/2001	New Hampshire's Petition for Rehearing
6/25/2001	Appendices to New Hampshire's Petition for Rehearing Volume I
6/25/2001	Appendices to New Hampshire's Petition for Rehearing Volume II
N/A	Lodging in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
N/A	Lodging in Support of Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint

No. 131, Orig., SE Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste v. North Carolina (2000)

File Date	Document Title
7/10/2000	Motion for Leave to Fill Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
9/11/2000	Brief in Opposition
9/25/2000	Reply Brief
5/30/2001	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
6/5/2001	Supplemental Brief in Response to the Brief of the Solicitor General

No. 132, Orig., Alabama v. North Carolina (2002)

File Date	Document Title
6/3/2002	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
8/5/2002	Brief in Opposition
8/21/2002	Petitioners' Reply Brief
4/22/2003	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/30/2003	Supplemental Briefs of Plaintiffs
9/24/2003	Plaintiffs' Opposition to North Carolina's Motion to Dismiss
10/7/2003	Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Claims of Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Commission
4/2/2009	Preliminary Report of the Special Master
4/2/2009	Second Report of the Special Master
6/25/2009	Exceptions by Plaintiffs to the Preliminary and Second Reports of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
6/25/2009	Exceptions of the State of North Carolina to the Reports of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
8/10/2009	The State of North Carolina's Reply to Exceptions by Plaintiffs to the Reports of the Special Master
8/10/2009	Brief in Reply to North Carolina's Exceptions to the Preliminary and Second Reports of the Special Master
9/9/2009	The State of North Carolina's Sub-Reply Brief
9/9/2009	Brief in Surreply to North Carolina's Reply
7/15/2009	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
7/15/2009	Brief of Amicus Curiae Rocky Mountain Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Board, Northwest Interstate Compact Committee on Low-Level Waste Management, Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission, and Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission in Support of Plaintiffs
6/1/2010	On Exceptions to the Preliminary and Second Reports of the Special Master [Slip Opinion]
1/18/2011	[Dismissal notice]

No. 133, Orig., Arkansas v. Oklahoma (2005)

File Date	Document Title
11/7/2005	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
11/7/2005	Appendix to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint
1/6/2006	Oklahoma's Response in Opposition to Arkansas's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
1/6/2006	Appendix to Oklahoma's Response in Opposition to Arkansas's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
2/7/2006	Reply Brief

No. 134, Orig., New Jersey v. Delaware (2005)

File Date	Document Title
8/1/2005	Motion to Reopen and For a Supplemental Decree, Petition, Brief and Appendix in Support of Motion
10/27/2005	Brief of the State of Delaware in Opposition to the State of New Jersey's Motion to Reopen and for a Supplemental Decree
11/8/2005	Reply Brief and Supplemental Appendix in Support of Motion to Reopen and for a Supplemental Decree
12/28/2005	Answer of State of Delaware and Motion for Appointment of Special Master
1/9/2006	Brief in Opposition to Delaware's Motion for Appointment of Special Master
1/17/2006	Reply in Support of Motion for Appointment of Special Master
4/16/2007	Report of the Special Master
7/30/2007	Exceptions by New Jersey to the Report of the Special Master and Supporting Brief
7/30/2007	Brief of BP America Inc. and Crown Landing LLC, as Amicus Curiae, in Support of the State of New Jersey
9/28/2007	Reply Brief of Delaware in Response to Exceptions by New Jersey to the Report of the Special Master
3/31/2008	On Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 135, Orig., Texas v. Leavitt (2006)

File Date	Document Title
3/3/2006	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Supporting Brief, and Bill of Complaint
3/3/2006	Brief of the States of Arizona, Alaska, Connecticut, Kansas, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Vermont as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs
3/17/2006	Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/16/2006	Brief for the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Opposition
5/18/2006	Brief of Professors and Practitioners of Health Law as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs
5/26/2006	Plaintiffs' Reply Brief

No. 136, Orig., Brzak v. United Nations (2006)

File Date	Document Title
5/5/2006	Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Complaint in an Original Action and Plaintiffs' Brief in Support and Complaint

No. 137, Orig., Montana v. Wyoming (2007)

File Date	Document Title
1/31/2007	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint, and Brief in Support
4/3/2007	Wyoming's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
4/16/2007	Montana's Reply Brief
1/2/2008	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
4/4/2008	Wyoming's Motion to Dismiss Bill of Complaint
4/25/2008	Motion of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief in Support of Respondent State of Wyoming
5/9/2008	Montana's Brief in Response to Wyoming's Motion to Dismiss Bill of Complaint
5/16/2008	Brief for Amicus Curiae Northern Cheyenne Tribe in Support of Plaintiff State of Montana
5/16/2008	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss
5/27/2008	Wyoming's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Bill of Complaint
2/9/2010	First Interim Report of the Special Master
2/16/2010	Joint Appendix of the Parties Volume I (pages 1-498)
2/9/2010	Joint Appendix of the Parties Volume II (pages 499-957)
5/13/2010	Montana's Exception and Brief
5/20/2010	Brief of Amicus Curiae Northern Cheyenne Tribe in Support of Montana's Exceptions
6/15/2010	Wyoming's Reply to Montana's Exception
6/22/2010	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Opposing Plaintiff's Exception
7/14/2010	Montana's Sur-Reply
5/2/2011	On Exception to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
12/29/2014	Second Interim Report of the Special Master (Liability Issues)
4/9/2015	Wyoming's Exceptions to the Second Interim Report of the Special Master (Liability Issues) and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/9/2015	Montana's Exception and Brief
5/7/2015	Wyoming's Reply to Montana's Exception
5/11/2015	Montana's Reply Brief Opposing the Exception of Wyoming
6/3/2015	Wyoming's Sur-Reply in Support of Exception
6/10/2015	Montana's Sur-Reply Brief in Support of Its Exception
3/21/2016	Order and Judgment
1/10/2018	Final Interim Report of the Special Master

No. 138, Orig., South Carolina v. North Carolina (2007)

File Date	Document Title
6/7/2007	Motion of the State of South Carolina for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Complaint
8/7/2007	Brief of the State of North Carolina in Opposition
8/22/2007	Reply Brief of the State of South Carolina in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Complaint
11/30/2007	Answer to Bill of Complaint
11/30/2007	Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC's Motion and Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene and File Answer, and Answer
11/30/2007	Motion of the Catawba River Water Supply Project for Leave to Intervene and Brief in Support of the Motion
12/11/2007	Brief of the State of South Carolina in Opposition to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC's Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
12/13/2007	Brief of the State of South Carolina in Opposition to Motion of the Catawba River Water Supply Project for Leave to Intervene
12/14/2007	Reply Brief in Support of the Motion of the Catawba River Water Supply Project for Leave to Intervene
12/19/2007	Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
2/13/2008	Motion for Leave to Intervene of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, and Brief in Support of Motion
2/25/2008	Brief of the State of South Carolina in Opposition to Motion for Leave to Intervene of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina
2/25/2008	Brief of the State of North Carolina in Response to the City of Charlotte's Motion for Leave to Intervene and File Answer
3/11/2008	Reply Brief for the City of Charlotte, North Carolina
11/28/2008	First Interim Report of the Special Master
12/9/2008	Motion of the State of South Carolina for Leave to File Exceptions to First Interim Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Exceptions
12/18/2008	Intervenors' Response to the Motion of the State of South Carolina for Leave to File Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
12/19/2008	North Carolina's Brief in Opposition to South Carolina's Motion for Leave to File Exceptions to the Special Master's First Interim Report
12/22/2008	Reply Brief of the State of South Carolina in Support of its Motion to File Exceptions to First Interim Report of the Special Master
2/13/2009	Exceptions of the State of South Carolina to First Interim Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exceptions
2/23/2009	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Exceptions
3/9/2009	Reply of Catawba River Supply Project to Exceptions of South Carolina to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
3/9/2009	Reply Brief of the City of Charlotte in Response to Exceptions of South Carolina
3/9/2009	Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC's Brief in Reply to South Carolina's Exceptions to First Interim Report
3/9/2009	Brief of the State of North Carolina in Opposition to Plaintiff's Exceptions
3/23/2009	Sur-Reply Brief of the State of South Carolina in Support of Exceptions to First Interim Report of the Special Master
1/20/2010	On Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 139, Orig., Mississippi v. City of Memphis, Tenn., Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. (2009)

File Date	Document Title
9/2/2009	The State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
12/2/2009	Brief of Defendant State of Tennessee in Opposition to State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action
12/2/2009	Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
12/16/2009	The State of Mississippi's Reply to Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint of the City of Memphis, Tennessee and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division
12/16/2009	The State of Mississippi's Reply to Brief in Opposition of the State of Tennessee to for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action

No. 140, Orig., Louisiana v. Bryson (2011)

File Date	Document Title
11/14/2011	Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
1/13/2012	Brief of the Amicus Curiae Kris W. Kobach, Secretary of State of the State of Kansas in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint
1/13/2012	Brief Amicus Curiae of U.S. Border Control, U.S. Border Control Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, Institute on the Constitution, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, English First, English First Foundation, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, The Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Public Advocate of the United States, Policy Analysis Center, Del. Bob Marshall, Rep. Charles Key, Del. Don Dwyer, Rep. Matt Shea, Sen. Kit Jennings, Bob Fanning, and Chuck Baldwin in Support of Plaintiffs
1/13/2012	Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Complaint
1/13/2012	Brief of Judicial Watch, Inc. and Allied Educational Foundation as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Complaint
2/13/2012	Brief for the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the Census in Opposition
2/29/2012	Plaintiffs' Reply Brief

No. 141, Orig., Texas v. New Mexico (2013)

File Date	Document Title
1/8/2013	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/11/2013	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/11/2013	New Mexico's Brief in Opposition to Texas' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/11/2013	Brief of Amicus Curiae El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 in Support of the State of Texas' Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/11/2013	Brief of Amicus Curiae City of El Paso, Texas in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
3/11/2013	Brief of Hudspeth County Conservation and Reclamation District No. 1 as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/11/2013	City of Las Cruces' Amicus Curiae Brief Opposing Texas' Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and Supporting Defendants
3/22/2013	Reply Brief of the State of Texas
12/10/2013	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
12/31/2013	New Mexico's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief and Supplemental Brief in Response to the United States
12/31/2013	Supplemental Brief in Opposition
1/7/2014	Texas' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief and Supplemental Brief in Response to New Mexico's Supplemental Brief
2/27/2014	Motion of the United States for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint in Intervention, and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff
3/10/2014	New Mexico's Response to the Motion of the United States for Leave to Intervene as a Plaintiff
3/10/2014	Texas' Response in Support of Motion of the United States for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
3/14/2014	Reply Memorandum of the United States in Support of Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff
4/30/2014	New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas' Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
4/30/2014	City of Las Cruces' Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of State of New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas' Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
6/16/2014	Brief for the United States in Opposition to New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas's Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
6/16/2014	Texas' Brief in Response to New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas' Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
6/16/2014	Brief of Amicus Curiae City of El Paso, Texas in Opposition to New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas' Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
6/16/2014	Brief of Hudspeth County Conservation and Reclamation District No. 1 as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss
6/16/2014	Brief of Amicus Curiae El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 in Support of State of Texas and United States in Opposition to New Mexico's Motion to Dismiss Texas' Complaint and the United States' Complaint in Intervention
7/1/2014	New Mexico's Reply Brief
12/3/2014	Motion of Elephant Butte Irrigation District for Leave to Intervene, and Memorandum of Points and Authorities
1/29/2015	Brief for the United States in Opposition to Elephant Butte Irrigation Districts Motion for Leave to Intervene
1/29/2015	State of New Mexico's Response in Opposition to the Motion of Elephant Butte Irrigation District for Leave to Intervene
1/29/2015	Texas' Brief in Response to Elephant Butte Irrigation District's Motion for Leave to Intervene
1/29/2015	State of Colorado's Response to Elephant Butte Irrigation District's Motion for Leave to Intervene
3/20/2015	Elephant Butte Irrigation District's Reply to Brief Opposing Motion for Leave to Intervene
4/22/2015	Motion of El Paso Water Improvement District No. 1 for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff, Complaint in Intervention, and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene as a Plaintiff
6/10/2015	Brief for the United States in Opposition to El Paso Water Improvement District No. 1's Motion for Leave to Intervene
6/10/2015	Texas' Brief in Response to El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 Motion for Leave to Intervene
6/10/2015	State of New Mexico's Response in Opposition to the Motion of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 for Leave to Intervene
6/10/2015	State of Colorado's Response to El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 Motion for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiff
7/10/2015	Reply in Support of Motion of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 for Leave to Intervene
2/13/2017	First Interim Report of the Special Master
6/9/2017	State of Colorado's Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
6/9/2017	State of New Mexico's Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support
6/9/2017	Exception of the United States and Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
6/9/2017	Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority's Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of State of New Mexico's Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
6/9/2017	City of Las Cruces' Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of State of New Mexico's Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
6/9/2017	Motion for Leave to File and Brief of Amicus Curiae New Mexico Pecan Growers in Support of Defendant State of New Mexico
6/9/2017	Motion for Leave to File and Brief of Amicus Curiae New Mexico State University in Support of Defendant State of New Mexico
7/28/2017	State of Colorado's Reply to Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
7/28/2017	State of New Mexico's Reply to the Exceptions of the United States and Colorado
7/28/2017	Texas's Reply to Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master
7/28/2017	Reply Brief for the United States
7/28/2017	Brief of Amicus Curiae City of El Paso, Texas in Support of the State of Texas' Reply to Exceptions to the First Interim Report of the Special Master
7/28/2017	Elephant Butte Irrigation District's Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of the State of Texas
8/4/2017	Brief of the State of Kansas as Amicus Curiae in Support of Texas
8/1/2017	Brief of Amicus Curiae El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 in Support of the State of Texas' Reply to Exceptions Regarding the First Interim Report of the Special Master and in Support of Certain Exceptions of the United States
8/31/2017	Texas's Sur-Reply
9/1/2017	State of Colorado's Sur-Reply
9/1/2017	State of New Mexico's Sur-Reply to the Replies of the United States, Texas, and Colorado
9/1/2017	Sur-Reply Brief for the United States
5/23/2018	State of New Mexico's Answer to the State of Texas's Complaint
5/23/2018	State of New Mexico's Answer to the United States' Complaint in Intervention
5/23/2018	State of New Mexico's Counterclaims
7/20/2018	State of Texas's Answer to Counterclaims of the State of New Mexico
7/23/2018	United States' Answer to New Mexico's Counterclaims
3/5/2018	On Exceptions to Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
3/20/2019	Motion of the Nathan Boyd Estate and James Boyd, Individually, Oscar V. Butler, Rose Marie Arispe Butler, Margie Garcia, Sammie Singh, and Sammie Holguin Singh Jr., (Collectively Pre-Federal Claimants) for Leave to Intervene as Plaintiffs in this Original Jurisdiction Case, Complaint in Intervention and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene
4/18/2019	Texas's Response to Motion for Leave to Intervene by the Nathan Boyd Estate and James Boyd, Individually, Oscar V. Butler, Rose Marie Arispe Butler, Margie Garcia, Sammie Singh, and Sammie Holguin Singh Jr.
5/20/2019	Brief for the United States in Opposition to the Motion for Leave to Intervene of the Nathan Boyd Estate, Et Al.
12/3/2019	Second Interim Report of the Special Master
7/3/2023	Third Interim Report of the Special Master
10/6/2023	Exception of the United States and Brief for the United States in Support of Exception
10/6/2023	The State of Texas, State of New Mexico, and State of Colorado's Joint Notice of No Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master
10/13/2023	Elephant Butte Irrigation District's Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Exception and Brief for the United States
10/13/2023	Brief of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 as Amicus Curiae in Support of the United States
12/4/2023	Joint Reply to Exception of the United States by the States of Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado
1/3/2024	Sur-Reply Brief for the United States

No. 142, Orig., Florida v. Georgia (2013)

File Date	Document Title
10/1/2013	Florida's Motion for Leave to File a Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
1/31/2014	State of Georgia's Opposition to Florida's Motion for Leave to File a Complaint
2/10/2014	State of Florida's Reply in Support of its Motion for Leave to File a Complaint
9/18/2014	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
10/8/2014	Supplemental Brief for Florida
10/9/2014	Supplemental Brief for the State of Georgia
10/10/2014	Supplemental Brief for Florida
1/8/2015	State of Georgia's Answer
2/16/2017	Report of the Special Master February 14, 2017
5/31/2017	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master by Plaintiff State of Florida and Brief in Support of Exceptions
7/31/2017	Georgia's Reply to Florida's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
8/7/2017	State of Colorado's Brief as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Florida's Exceptions
8/7/2017	Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of the State of Georgia by the Atlanta Regional Commission Dekalb County, Georgia Forsyth County, Georgia Fulton County, Georgia Gwinnett County, Georgia the City of Atlanta, Georgia the City of Gainesville, Georgia and the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
8/7/2017	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Overruling Florida's Exception 2C to the Report of the Special Master
8/30/2017	Sur-Reply in Support of Exceptions to Report of the Special Master
6/27/2018	On Exceptions to Report Special Master [Slip Opinion]
1/27/2020	Report of the Special Master December 11, 2019
4/13/2020	Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master by Plaintiff State of Florida and Brief in Support of Exceptions
4/20/2020	Brief of Franklin County Seafood Workers Association as Amicus Curiae
6/26/2020	Georgia's Reply to Florida's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master
7/2/2020	AAmicus Curiae Brief in Support of the State of Georgia by the Atlanta Regional Commission, Bartow County, Georgia, Dekalb County, Georgia, Forsyth County, Georgia, Fulton County, Georgia, Gwinnett County, Georgia, The City of Gainesville, Georgia, and the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
7/6/2020	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Overruling Florida's Exceptions 2(d) and 3(iv) to the Report of the Special Master
7/27/2020	Sur-Reply in Support of Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by Plaintiff State of Florida
4/1/2021	On Exceptions to Second Report of Special Master [Slip Opinion]

No. 143, Orig., Mississippi v. Tennessee (2014)

File Date	Document Title
6/6/2014	The State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action, Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion
9/5/2014	Brief of the City of Memphis, Tennessee, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division in Opposition to the State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action
9/5/2014	Brief of Defendant State of Tennessee in Opposition to State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action
9/24/2014	Reply Brief of the State of Mississippi on its Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint in Original Action
5/12/2015	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
5/22/2015	Supplemental Brief of the State of Mississippi in Response to Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
9/11/2015	Answer of Defendants the City of Memphis, Tennessee, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division
9/14/2015	Answer of Defendant State of Tennessee
2/22/2021	Exception in Part of Defendants State of Tennessee, City of Memphis, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water to Report of the Special Master and Brief in Support of Exception
2/22/2021	Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by Plaintiff State of Mississippi and Brief in Support of Exceptions
3/1/2021	Amicus Curiae Brief for the International Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association in Support of Neither Party
4/23/2021	Reply of Defendant State of Tennessee to Exceptions of Plaintiff State of Mississippi to Report of the Special Master
4/23/2021	Reply of the City of Memphis, Tennessee, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division to the Exceptions of the State of Mississippi
4/23/2021	Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Exception to the Report of the Special Master
4/29/2021	Brief of Amici Curiae States of Colorado, Idaho, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, and Wyoming in Support of Defendant Tennessee
4/30/2021	Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Defendants
4/30/2021	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Overruling Mississippi's Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master

No. 144, Orig., Nebraska v. Colorado (2014)

File Date	Document Title
12/18/2014	Motion for Leave to File Complaint, Complaint, and Brief in Support
2/19/2015	Brief for All Nine Former Administrators of Drug Enforcement as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff States' Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
3/27/2015	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
3/27/2015	Amicus Brief of the States of Washington and Oregon in Support of Respondent
4/3/2015	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
12/16/2015	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
1/5/2016	Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief

No. 145, Orig., Delaware v. Pennsylvania (2016)

File Date	Document Title
5/26/2016	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint, and Brief in Support
6/3/2016	Brief of the State of Wisconsin and Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim
6/9/2016	Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Brief in Response to State of Delaware's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
6/23/2016	Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
7/6/2016	Brief of Amicus Curiae MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. in Support of the Movant
8/1/2016	Brief of Amicus Curiae the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization in Support of the Movant
10/28/2016	Pennsylvania's Answer and Counterclaims to Delaware's Bill of Complaint
10/31/2016	Answer of the State of Wisconsin to the Bill of Complaint of the State of Delaware
11/1/2016	Answer to Counterclaim
11/1/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to State of Arkansas Et Al.'s Bill of Complaint
11/1/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to State of Wisconsin's Counterclaim
11/11/2016	Pennsylvania's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint, Bill of Third Party Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint
11/18/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Counterclaim
12/28/2016	Brief of Proposed Third-Party Defendant Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third-Party Complaint
1/9/2017	Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint Against Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and State of Wisconsin, and Amended Bill of Complaint
1/9/2017	Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim Against the State of Arkansas Et Al., and Amended Counterclaim
1/11/2017	Pennsylvania's Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint
1/18/2017	Pennsylvania's Response to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint
1/24/2017	Wisconsin's Response in Opposition to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint
1/26/2017	Response in Opposition to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim
2/3/2017	Reply Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint Against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of Wisconsin and to Amend Counterclaim Against the State of Arkansas Et Al.
7/27/2021	First Interim Report of the Special Master
11/18/2021	Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/18/2021	Appendix to Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware - Volume I of III
11/18/2021	Appendix to Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware - Volume II of III
11/24/2021	Brief of Amicus Curiae American Bankers Association in Support of Neither Party
12/20/2021	Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
12/20/2021	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume I
12/20/2021	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume II
12/27/2021	Brief of Amicus Curiae Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization in Support of the Defendant States
1/19/2022	Sur-Reply of the State of Delaware in Support of Exceptions
1/10/2023	Supplemental Brief of Amicus Curiae American Bankers in Support of Neither Party
1/10/2023	Exceptions of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Second Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
1/10/2023	Exceptions to the Second Interim Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware and Brief in Support of Exceptions
1/20/2023	Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to Second Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
1/20/2023	Reply of the State of Delaware to Defendants' Exceptions
2/28/2023	On Exceptions to Reports of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume III - Under Seal

No. 146, Orig., Arkansas v. Delaware (2016)

File Date	Document Title
6/9/2016	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint, and Brief in Support
7/15/2016	Brief of Amicus Curiae Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. in Support of the Movants
8/5/2016	State of Delaware's Brief in Response to State of Arkansas Et Al.'s Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim, and Counterclaim
10/28/2016	Pennsylvania's Answer and Counterclaims to Delaware's Bill of Complaint
10/31/2016	Answer of the State of Wisconsin to the Bill of Complaint of the State of Delaware
11/1/2016	Answer to Counterclaim
11/1/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to State of Arkansas Et Al.'s Bill of Complaint
11/1/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to State of Wisconsin's Counterclaim
11/11/2016	Pennsylvania's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint, Bill of Third Party Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint
11/18/2016	State of Delaware's Answer to Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Counterclaim
12/28/2016	Brief of Proposed Third-Party Defendant Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third-Party Complaint
1/9/2017	Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint Against Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and State of Wisconsin, and Amended Bill of Complaint
1/9/2017	Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim Against the State of Arkansas Et Al., and Amended Counterclaim
1/11/2017	Pennsylvania's Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for Leave to File Bill of Third Party Complaint
1/18/2017	Pennsylvania's Response to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint
1/24/2017	Wisconsin's Response in Opposition to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint
1/26/2017	Response in Opposition to Delaware's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim
2/3/2017	Reply Brief in Support of Motions for Leave to Amend Bill of Complaint Against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of Wisconsin and to Amend Counterclaim Against the State of Arkansas Et Al.
7/27/2021	First Interim Report of the Special Master
11/18/2021	Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware and Brief in Support of Exceptions
11/18/2021	Appendix to Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware - Volume I of III
11/18/2021	Appendix to Exceptions to Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware - Volume II of III
11/24/2021	Brief of Amicus Curiae American Bankers Association in Support of Neither Party
12/20/2021	Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
12/20/2021	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume I
12/20/2021	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume II
12/27/2021	Brief of Amicus Curiae Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization in Support of the Defendant States
1/19/2022	Sur-Reply of the State of Delaware in Support of Exceptions
1/10/2023	Supplemental Brief of Amicus Curiae American Bankers in Support of Neither Party
1/10/2023	Exceptions of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Second Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
1/10/2023	Exceptions to the Second Interim Report of the Special Master by the State of Delaware and Brief in Support of Exceptions
1/20/2023	Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to Second Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief
1/20/2023	Reply of the State of Delaware to Defendants' Exceptions
2/28/2023	On Exceptions to Reports of Special Master [Slip Opinion]
N/A	Appendix to Reply of Defendants in No. 145 and Plaintiffs in No. 146 to Delaware's Exceptions to First Interim Report of Special Master and Supporting Brief Volume III - Under Seal

No. 147, Orig., New Mexico v. Colorado (2016)

File Date	Document Title
6/20/2016	Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint, Bill of Complaint, and Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Complaint
10/21/2016	Colorado's Brief in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Complaint
5/23/2017	Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae

Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs