Supreme Court of the United States

Today at the Court - Tuesday, Feb 20, 2018

  • The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.
  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two, one-hour oral arguments.
  • Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<February 2018><<
February 2018
Calendar Info/Key


Oral Arguments

Week of Monday, February 19

Tuesday, February 20
Currier v. Virginia (16-1348)
City of Hays v. Vogt (16-1495)

Wednesday, February 21
Rosales-Mireles v. United States (16-9493)
Dahda v. United States (17-43)

The transcripts of oral arguments are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review. The audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are available to the public at the end of each argument week. The audio recordings are posted on Fridays after Conference.

Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

Recent Decisions

February 20, 2018
Montana v Wyoming (137, Orig)
Judgment is awarded against Wyoming and in favor of Montana for violations of the Yellowstone River Compact, and decree is entered.

CNH Industrial N. V. v. Reese (17-515)
In interpreting an unambiguous collective-bargaining agreement, the Sixth Circuit should have employed ordinary principles of contract law under M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, 574 U. S. ___, instead of relying on inferences to presume that the agreement vested retiree benefits for life.

January 22, 2018
National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense (16-299)
Challenges to an Environmental Protection Agency regulation defining the Clean Water Act term “waters of the United States” must be filed in federal district courts.

Artis v. District of Columbia (16-460)
Title 28 U. S. C. §1367(d)’s instruction to “toll” a state limitations period while a supplemental state-law claim is pending in federal court means to hold it in abeyance, i.e., to stop the clock.

District of Columbia v. Wesby (15-1485)
D. C. police officers had probable cause to arrest partygoers for holding a raucous, late-night party in a house they did not have permission to enter; and, in any event, the officers were entitled qualified immunity.

More Opinions...

The Authority of Law by James Earle Fraser.
The Authority of Law by James Earle Fraser.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

Did You Know...

The Authority of Law

The seated male figure to the right of the main steps of the Supreme Court Building is called The Authority of Law. James Earle Fraser, the sculptor, described the figure as “waiting with concentrated attention, holding in his left hand the tablet of laws, backed by the sheathed sword, symbolic of enforcement through law.”


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543