SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 22A136
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 22A136
Title:
Richard Rose, et al., Applicants
v.
Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State
Docketed:
August 15, 2022
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Numbers:
(22-12593)
Proceedings and Orders
Aug 14 2022
Application (22A136) to vacate stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Main Document
Other
Proof of Service
Aug 15 2022
Response to application (22A136) requested by Justice Thomas, due Wednesday, August 17, 2022, by 5 pm.
Aug 17 2022
Response to application from respondent Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger filed.
Main Document
Proof of Service
Aug 18 2022
Reply of applicant Richard Rose, et al. filed.
Reply
Proof of Service
Aug 19 2022
Application (22A136) referred to the Court.
Aug 19 2022
Application (22A136) to vacate stay presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is granted. The August 12, 2022 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit staying the district court’s injunction is vacated. Respondent’s emergency motion for a stay pending appeal relied on the traditional stay factors and a likelihood of success on the merits, see Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009), yet the Eleventh Circuit failed to analyze the motion under that framework. Instead, it applied a version of the Purcell principle, see Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006) (per curiam), that respondent could not fairly have advanced himself in light of his previous representations to the district court that the schedule on which the district court proceeded was sufficient to enable effectual relief as to the November elections should applicants win at trial. The Eleventh Circuit may reconsider whether a stay pending appeal is appropriate, subject to sound equitable discretion.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Bryan Ludington Sells
Counsel of Record
The Law Office of Bryan L. Sells LLC
Post Office Box 5493
Atlanta, GA 31107
bryan@bryansellslaw.com
Ph: 404-480-4212
Party name: Richard Rose, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents
Bryan Paul Tyson
Counsel of Record
Taylor English Duma LLP
1600 Parkwood Circle
Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30339
btyson@taylorenglish.com
Ph: 6783367249
Party name: Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##