SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 21A222
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 21A222
Title:
Mark Brnovich, Applicant
v.
Paul Isaacson, et al.
Docketed:
December 14, 2021
Linked with:
21-1609
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Numbers:
(21-16645, 21-16711)
Proceedings and Orders
Dec 10 2021
Application (21A222) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main Document
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Proof of Service
Dec 15 2021
Response to application (21A222) requested by Justice Kagan, due Tuesday, December 21, 2021, by 5 p.m.
Dec 21 2021
Response to application from respondents Paul Isaacson, et al. filed.
Main Document
Main Document
Proof of Service
Dec 22 2021
Reply of applicant Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona filed.
Reply
Proof of Service
Jun 29 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
Jun 29 2022
Application (21A222) referred to the Court.
Jun 30 2022
The application for stay (21A222) presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, and the petition is granted. The September 28, 2021 order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of
Dobbs
v.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization
, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Michael Shawn Catlett
Counsel of Record
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Office of the Solicitor General
2005 N. Central Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85004
michael.catlett@azag.gov
Ph: (602)542-7751
Party name: Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona
Attorneys for Respondents
Jessica Leah Sklarsky
Counsel of Record
Center for Reproductive Rights
199 Water Street, Floor 22
New York, NY 10038
jsklarsky@reprorights.org
Ph: 917-637-3764
Party name: Paul Isaacson, et al.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##