Search Results:

 QPReport
Court tentatively retained the requirement on stare decisis grounds. The legal and practical developments

 18-5924 Ramos v. Louisiana (04/20/2020)
Court when determiningwhether to preserve precedent on stare decisis grounds do not favor upholding Apodaca

 23A366 Griffin v. HM Florida-Orl, LLC (11/16/2023)
against anyone, party or not, in light of stare decisis. But district court judgments do not have that stare decisis effect. And the State here contends that the

 24-1078 Beck v. United States (11/24/2025)
out of respect for the Court’s rules of stare decisis, and in recognition of the reliance interests that Moreover, the “justification for statutory stare decisis is especially strong” when Congress has

 17-646 Gamble v. United States (06/17/2019)
d) Gamble’s attempts to blunt the force of stare decisis here do not succeed. He contends that the

 597us1r58_gebh.pdf
reaffrmed Roe solely on the basis of stare decisis. A proper application of stare decisis, however, requires an assessment of the strength of

 19-1392 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (06/24/2022)
and reaffirmed Roe solely on thebasis of stare decisis. A proper application of stare decisis, however, requires an assessment of the strength of