Search Results:

 18-1109 McKinney v. Arizona (02/25/2020)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 18–1109 JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY, PETITIONER v. ARIZONA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

 23-1363 Baker v. City of McKinney (11/25/2024)
THE UNITED STATES VICKI BAKER v. CITY OF MCKINNEY, TEXAS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE hadtaken his own life. All agree that the McKinney police acted properly that day and that their

 23-367 Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney (06/13/2024)
OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STARBUCKS CORP. v. MCKINNEY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REGION 15 OF THE j). When Congress 2 STARBUCKS CORP. v. McKINNEY Syllabus empowers courts to grant equitable relief

 Day Call, Wednesday, December 11, 2019
K. KATYAL Washington, D. C. No. 18-1109. (6) JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY, Petitioner V. 1 hour for argument. MR. ORAMEL H. SKINNER

 Hearing List December 2019
D. C. (1 hour for argument.) No. 18–1109. James Erin McKinney v. Arizona. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of

 18-1109_0pm1.pdf
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JAMES ERIN McKINNEY, ) Petitioner, ) v. ) No. 18-1109 ARIZONA, ) Respondent

 jnl19.pdf
to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit