Search Results:

 18-1109 McKinney v. Arizona (02/25/2020)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 18–1109 JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY, PETITIONER v. ARIZONA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

 23-1363 Baker v. City of McKinney (11/25/2024)
THE UNITED STATES VICKI BAKER v. CITY OF MCKINNEY, TEXAS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE hadtaken his own life. All agree that the McKinney police acted properly that day and that their

 Day Call, Wednesday, December 11, 2019
K. KATYAL Washington, D. C. No. 18-1109. (6) JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY, Petitioner V. 1 hour for argument. MR. ORAMEL H. SKINNER

 602us1r34_e29g.pdf
TERM, 2023 339 Syllabus STARBUCKS CORP. v. McKINNEY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REGION 15 OF THE NATIONAL Page Proof Pending Publication 340 STARBUCKS CORP. v. McKINNEY Syllabus merits, that he is likely to

 23-367 Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney (06/13/2024)
OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STARBUCKS CORP. v. MCKINNEY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF REGION 15 OF THE j). When Congress 2 STARBUCKS CORP. v. McKINNEY Syllabus empowers courts to grant equitable relief

 Hearing List December 2019
D. C. (1 hour for argument.) No. 18–1109. James Erin McKinney v. Arizona. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of

 589us1pp_web.pdf
589 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PRINT Vol. 589 (Pp. 1–153; 901–1247) UNITED STATES REPORTS Part 1 Volume 589 U. S. -Part 1 Pages 1–153; 901–1247 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT October 7, 2019, Through