SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT THE COURT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Visiting the Court
Activities for Students & Families
Exhibitions
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
Home
>
Search Results
475 items found. Page: 1 of 68 for your search: energy
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
590us2r37_j4ek.pdf
that actually signed the agreement and that GE
Energy
was a nonsignatory. It also held that allowing GE
Energy
to rely on state-law equitable estoppel doctrines
18-1048 GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (06/01/2020)
that actually signed the agreement and that GE
Energy
was a nonsignatory. It also held that allowing GE
Energy
to rely on state-law equitable estoppel doctrines
598us1r4_1a7d.pdf
action against his employer, petitioner Helix
Energy
Solutions Group, seeking overtime pay under the for Page Proof Pending Publication 40 HELIX
ENERGY
SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. v. HEWITT Syllabus the
21-984 Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt (02/22/2023)
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus HELIX
ENERGY
SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., ET AL. v. HEWITT CERTIORARI action against his employer, petitioner Helix
Energy
Solutions Group, seeking overtime pay under the
QPReport
the standards by which the Federal
Energy
Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulates wholesale
energy
rates. In United Gas Pipe Line Co
QPReport
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Federal
Energy
Regulatory Commission's jurisdiction over interstate markets for wholesale sales of electric
energy
under sections 201, 205 and 206 of the
QPReport
HOLDING THAT THE RULE ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL
ENERGY
REGULATORY COMMISSION IS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Federal
Energy
Regulatory Commission reasonably concluded that it
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##