SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
500+ items found for your search:
energy
Page: 1 of 72
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
23-971 Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (02/26/2025)
lawsuit against his former employer Halliburton
Energy
Services, Inc. He later submitted his claims No. 23–971 GARY WAETZIG, PETITIONER v. HALLIBURTON
ENERGY
SERVICES, INC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
584us1pp_final.pdf
584 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PRINT Vol. 584 (Pp. 1–380; 901–970) UNITED STATES REPORTS Part 1 Volume 584 U. S. -Part 1 Pages 1–380; 901–970 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT March 21 Through
Home - Supreme Court of the United States
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary Today at the Court - Sunday, Apr 27, 2025 The Supreme Court Building is closed on weekends and Diamond Alternative
Energy
, LLC v. EPA (24-7
16-712 Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC (04/24/2018)
hy-draulic fracturing. It sued respondent Greene’s
Energy
Group, LLC, in Federal District Court for infringement. Greene’s
Energy
chal-lenged the patent’s validity in the
590us2r37_j4ek.pdf
that actually signed the agreement and that GE
Energy
was a nonsignatory. It also held that allowing GE
Energy
to rely on state-law equitable estoppel doctrines
598us1r4_1a7d.pdf
action against his employer, petitioner Helix
Energy
Solutions Group, seeking overtime pay under the for Page Proof Pending Publication 40 HELIX
ENERGY
SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. v. HEWITT Syllabus the
18-1048 GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (06/01/2020)
that actually signed the agreement and that GE
Energy
was a nonsignatory. It also held that allowing GE
Energy
to rely on state-law equitable estoppel doctrines
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##