SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
339 items found. Page: 1 of 49 for your search: Inmates
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QuestionsReport
on the question of a death-sentenced
inmate's
mental retardation under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), that does not expose the
inmate
to the risk of any additional criminal punishment
QPReport
and that there was therefore "little likelihood that an
inmate
facing a serious risk of pain will be presented are: 1. Whether an
inmate's
as-applied method-of-execution challenge must be raised in a
QPReport
to a state's method of execution based on an
inmate's
rare and severe medical condition assume that of execution with an alternative proposed by an
inmate
be offered via a single witness, or should a
QPReport
Litigation Reform Act that relieves an
inmate
of his mandatory obligation to exhaust administrative remedies when the
inmate
erroneously believes that he satisfied exhaustion
stateoftenn_adminpolicies_9-15-2009.pdf
of providing a level of safety for
inmates
requiring such. E. Protective Custody Segregation: The puroseful separation of safekeeping
inmates
from the general TDOC population who do
QPReport
PRESENTED: Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, federal
inmates
can collaterally challenge their convictions on The question presented is whether federal
inmates
who did not-because established circuit precedent
20A70 Valentine v. Collier (11/16/2020)
on behalf of a class of fellow
inmates
, alleging that prison officials were violating the
inmates’
Eighth Amendment rights by failing to protect them
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##