Search Results:

 Home - Supreme Court of the United States
generally hears two, one-hour oral arguments, with attorneys Controlled Applications Act, 138 Stat. 955, do not violate petitioners’ First Amendment rights.

 20-197 Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. (04/05/2021)
is not ordinarily constrained by the First Amendment”). Whether governmental use of private space implicates the First Amendment often depends on the government’s controlover that

 QuestionsReport
the [Railway Labor Act], as informed by the First Amendment, prohibits the use of dissenters’ [union] fees for

 QPReport
system in its entirety, holding that the First Amendment (applied to the States through the 14th Amendment) prohibits a State from so allowing a candidate to

 QuestionsReport
Ct. 2759 (2008), this Court held that the First Amendment forbids the government from attempting to level the

 QPReport
QUESTION PRESENTED: This case is a First Amendment challenge to the partisan gerrymander of a single held that plaintiffs’ retaliation claim is a substantial one, required to be heard by a three-judge

 QPReport
held that probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-prosecution claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983