SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
500+ items found for your search:
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009). rule
Page: 1 of 72
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QuestionsReport
07-542
ARIZONA
V
.
GANT
DECISION BELOW: 216 Ariz. 1 THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED
QPReport
to death. For many years thereafter, the
Arizona
Supreme Court refused to apply Simmons. In Lynch
v
.
Arizona
, 578
U.S.
613 per curiam), this Court summarily reversed the
Arizona
Supreme
21-846 Cruz v. Arizona (02/22/2023)
on the requirement of adequacy; whether
Arizona’s
“state procedural
ruling
is adequate is itself a question of federal law” Beard
v
. Kindler, 558 U. S. 53, 60. A state procedural
ruling
that
Home - Supreme Court of the United States
FILING &
RULES
Rules
and Guidance Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary Contact
Us
Today at the Court - Wednesday, Jul 29, 2026 The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from
598us1r3_j4ek.pdf
on the requirement of adequacy; whether
Arizona's
“state procedural
ruling
is adequate is itself a question of federal law,” Beard
v
. Kindler, 558 U. S. 53, 60. A state procedural
ruling
that
QPReport
STATES CONSTITUTION AND 2 U.S.C. §2a(c) PERMIT
ARIZONA’S
USE OF A COMMISSION TO ADOPT CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS? 2) DOES THE
ARIZONA
LEGISLATURE HAVE STANDING TO BRING THIS SUIT
Speeches - sp_06-12-09 - Supreme Court of the United States
FILING &
RULES
Rules
and Guidance and by far most prominent of this set, in
Arizona
v
.
Gant
, the Court revisited New York
v
. Belton, and substantially cut back on the scope of
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##