Supreme Court of the United States

Today at the Court - Wednesday, Apr 29, 2026


  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.
  • The Court may announce opinions, which are posted on the homepage after announcement from the Bench.
  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed to the public.
  • The Supreme Court Building will reopen to the public following the conclusion of the Court session and close at 3 p.m.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<April 2026><<
April 2026
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
1213141516
 
18
19202122232425
2627282930  
       
Calendar Info/Key

 



Recent Decisions


April 29, 2026
         
First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport (24-781)
In a 42 U. S. C. §1983 suit challenging a subpoena issued by the New Jersey Attorney General demanding documents and donor information, First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amendment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing.

         
Louisiana v. Callais (24-109)
Because the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 52 U. S. C. §10301 et seq., did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of race in creating SB8, and that map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.



April 22, 2026
         
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (24-783)
Because 28 U. S. C. §1446(b)(1)’s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge’s removal of the case to federal court outside the statute’s 30-day deadline was untimely.

         
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. (24-924)
The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in finding Winston Hencely’s state-law tort claims preempted where the Federal Government neither ordered nor authorized Fluor Corporation’s challenged conduct.



April 20, 2026
       
District of Columbia v. R.W. (25-248) (Per Curiam)
Because Officer Vanterpool clearly had reasonable suspicion to stop R. W., the judgment of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

Cushing’s Finest Hour


On display in the Justices’ Dining Room is a mahogany tall clock, originally owned by Justice William Cushing, who served on the Supreme Court from 1790 to 1810. Designed by William Claggett (1694‐1748), a well-known 18th-century clockmaker, the timepiece features a sarcophagus top and a brass and silvered dial. Today, only 68 clocks by Claggett are known to exist, making this treasured Cushing family heirloom quite rare.

 

Mahogany tall clock by William Claggett, circa 1735–1748, previously owned by Justice William Cushing.
Mahogany tall clock by William Claggett, circa 1735–1748,
previously owned by Justice William Cushing.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543