Supreme Court of the United States

Quick Links


Electronic Filing

Courtroom Seating

Fellows Program

Contact Us
Live Audio
Live Audio

Today at the Court - Tuesday, Jan 20, 2026

  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.
  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.
  • The Court may announce opinions, which are posted on the homepage after announcement from the Bench.
  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed to the public.
  • The Supreme Court Building will reopen to the public following the conclusion of the Court session and close at 3 p.m.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<January 2026><<
January 2026
SMTWTFS
    
 
23
45678
 
10
11121314151617
18
 
2021222324
25262728293031
       
Calendar Info/Key

 


Oral Arguments

Week of Monday, January 19


Tuesday, January 20
       
Wolford v. Lopez (24-1046)
       
M & K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM Pension Fund (23-1209)



Wednesday, January 21
       
Trump, President of U.S. v. Cook (25A312)

 

The audio recordings and transcripts of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review.


Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

Recent Decisions


January 20, 2026
         
Berk v. Choy (24-440)
Delaware law requiring a plaintiff suing for medical malpractice to provide an affidavit from a medical professional attesting to the suit’s merit, Del. Code, Tit. 18, §6853(a)(1), conflicts with a valid Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and does not apply in federal court.

         
Ellingburg v. United States (24-482)
Restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 is criminal punishment for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.

         
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton (24-808)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)’s reasonable-time limit applies to a motion alleging that a judgment is void under Rule 60(b)(4).



January 14, 2026
         
Barrett v. United States (24-5774)
Congress did not clearly authorize convictions under both 18 U. S. C. §§924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) for a single act that violates both provisions—therefore, one act that violates both may spawn only one conviction; the part of the Second Circuit’s judgment that held otherwise is reversed.

         
Case v. Montana (24-624)
Under the standard set in Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U. S. 398, 400, the Fourth Amendment allows police officers to enter a home without a warrant if they have an “objectively reasonable basis for believing” that someone inside needs emergency assistance; that standard was met here.

         
Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections (24-568)
As a candidate for office, Congressman Bost has standing to challenge the rules that govern the counting of votes in his election.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

Commissioner Thomas Johnson


With the passage of the Residence Act in 1790, Congress stipulated that a “district of territory, not exceeding ten miles square,” was to be “located on the river Potomack” establishing the future site of the nation’s capital. In early 1791, President George Washington appointed three commissioners to survey and define the district: Thomas Johnson, Daniel Carroll, and David Stuart. Their task was to “provide suitable buildings for the accommodation of Congress, and of the President, and for the public offices of the government of the United States” before the first Monday in December 1800, but only the President’s House and the North Wing of the Capitol were completed on time.

While serving as commissioner, Johnson was also appointed to the Supreme Court by President Washington in 1791. Citing the rigors of circuit riding, Justice Johnson resigned from the Court after serving just over a year.

 

1 / 2
The commissioners hired Andrew Ellicott and Benjamin Banneker, an African American astronomer, to conduct the survey. Plan of the city of Washington in the territory of Columbia.
The commissioners hired Andrew Ellicott and Benjamin Banneker, an African American astronomer, to conduct the survey. Plan of the city of Washington in the territory of Columbia.
Library of Congress
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
2 / 2
Justice Thomas Johnson resigned as commissioner in 1794. Engraving by Joseph Ives Pease after Charles Willson Peale.
Justice Thomas Johnson resigned as commissioner in 1794. Engraving by Joseph Ives Pease after Charles Willson Peale.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
Opinions
Filing & Rules
Oral Arguments
Case Documents
News Media
About
Visit
Contact Us | Site Map | Help | Fellows Program | Jobs | Links | Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543