SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 25-5786
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 25-5786
Title:
Vamsidhar Vurimindi, Petitioner
v.
Pennsylvania
Docketed:
October 2, 2025
Lower Ct:
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office
Case Numbers:
(2272 EDA 2023)
Decision Date:
February 5, 2025
Discretionary Court Decision Date:
July 2, 2025
Proceedings and Orders
Sep 16 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Appendix
Proof of Service
Petition
Oct 16 2025
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
Main Document
Oct 23 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
Nov 10 2025
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioner
Vamsidhar Vurimindi
821 Gunter Street
Austin, TX 78702
Party name: Vamsidhar Vurimindi
Attorneys for Respondent
Katherine Elizabeth Ernst
Counsel of Record
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office
3 S. Penn Square
Philadephia, PA 19107
katherine.ernst@phila.gov
Ph: 2156865700
Party name: Pennsylvania
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##