SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 25-5473
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 25-5473
Title:
Samreen Riaz, Petitioner
v.
Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, et al.
Docketed:
August 26, 2025
Lower Ct:
Supreme Court of California
Case Numbers:
(S291238)
Decision Date:
July 23, 2025
Proceedings and Orders
Jul 31 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Appendix
Proof of Service
Petition
Oct 09 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
Nov 10 2025
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Dec 16 2025
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main Document
Jan 14 2026
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
Feb 23 2026
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioner
Samreen Riaz
1534 S. Manzanita St.
Visalia, CA 93292
Ph: (951) 373-0229
Party name: Samreen Riaz
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##