SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 23-7282
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 23-7282
Title:
Jeff Baoliang Zhang, Petitioner
v.
County of Los Angeles, California, et al.
Docketed:
April 19, 2024
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Numbers:
(23-55353)
Decision Date:
February 23, 2024
Proceedings and Orders
Apr 16 2024
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Petition
Appendix
Proof of Service
May 16 2024
Brief of respondent County of Los Angeles, California in opposition filed.
Main Document
Proof of Service
Certificate of Word Count
May 24 2024
Reply of petitioner Jeff Baoliang Zhang filed.
Main Document
Proof of Service
Jun 05 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
Jun 24 2024
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Jeff Baoliang Zhang
P.O. Box 41272
Los Angeles, CA 90041
zjeff8811@gmail.com
Ph: (213) 436-9390
Party name: Jeff Baoliang Zhang
Attorneys for Respondents
Melinda Cantrall
Counsel of Record
Hurrell Cantrall LLP
Ernst & Young Plaza
725 S. Figueroa St. Suite 3800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
mcantrall@hurrellcantrall.com
Ph: 6268646040
Party name: County of Los Angeles
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##