SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 23-6409
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 23-6409
Title:
Alfred E. Caraffa, Petitioner
v.
Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
Docketed:
January 4, 2024
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Numbers:
(23-15622)
Decision Date:
December 18, 2023
Proceedings and Orders
Dec 29 2023
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Petition
Appendix
Proof of Service
Feb 05 2024
Waiver of right of federal respondent to respond filed.
Main Document
Feb 15 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
Mar 04 2024
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Apr 06 2024
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main Document
Apr 30 2024
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
May 20 2024
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioner
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Counsel of Record
ADC #350727
ASPC-Tucson (Rincon Unit)
P.O. Box 24403
Tucson, AZ 85734
Party name: Alfred E. Caraffa
Attorneys for Respondents
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Counsel of Record
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SUPREMECTBRIEFS@USDOJ.GOV
Ph: 202-514-2217
Party name: AZ DOC, et al.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##