SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 22-6203
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 22-6203
Title:
Peter Gakuba, Petitioner
v.
Rachel Dodd
Docketed:
December 2, 2022
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Case Numbers:
(22-1982)
Decision Date:
November 22, 2022
Proceedings and Orders
Nov 26 2022
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Petition
Proof of Service
Appendix
Dec 06 2022
Waiver of right of respondent Rachel Dodd to respond filed.
Main Document
Dec 08 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
Jan 09 2023
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Peter Gakuba
58 W. Biddle Street
Apt. 103
Baltimore, MD 21201
Ph: 410-244-8100
Party name: Peter Gakuba
Attorneys for Respondents
Katherine Marie Doersch
Counsel of Record
Office of the Illinois Attorney General
100 W. Randolph Street
12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
katherine.doersch@ilag.gov
Ph: 773 590 7078
Party name: Rachel Dodd
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##