Supreme Court of the United States
Skip Navigation LinksHome > Search Results



Docket for 20-1212
Print  Notify Me  
Search documents in this case:
No. 20-1212
 
Title: Peyman Pakdel, et ux., Petitioners
v.
City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Docketed: March 3, 2021
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
   Case Numbers: (17-17504)
   Decision Date: March 17, 2020
   Rehearing Denied: October 13, 2020
 
Proceedings and Orders
Feb 26 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)
Petition Appendix Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service
Mar 04 2021 Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al.
Blanket Consent
Mar 18 2021 Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
Mar 23 2021 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.
Apr 01 2021 Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed.
Main Document Proof of Service Certificate of Word Count
Apr 01 2021 Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.
Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service
Apr 02 2021 Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service
May 03 2021 Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.
Main Document Proof of Service Certificate of Word Count
May 14 2021 Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service
May 18 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
Jun 01 2021 Rescheduled.
Jun 07 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
Jun 08 2021 Rescheduled.
Jun 14 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
Jun 21 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
Jun 28 2021 Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
Jul 30 2021 JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Jeffrey Wilson McCoy
Counsel of Record
Pacific Legal Foundation
930 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
jmccoy@pacificlegal.org
Ph: 916-419-7111
Party name: Peyman Pakdel, et al.


Attorneys for Respondents
Kristen Ann Jensen
Counsel of Record
Office of the San Francisco City Attorney
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, City Hall, Room 234
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682
kristen.jensen@sfcityatty.org
Ph: 4153101103
Party name: City and County of San Francisco, et al.


Kristen A. Jensen

Office of the City Attorney
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., Rm. 234
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682
kristen.jensen@sfgov.org
Ph: (415) 554-4615
Party name: City and County of San Francisco, et al.


Other Attorneys
Sarah Elizabeth Roy Harbison
Counsel of Record
Pelican Instititue for Public Policy
400 Poydras St., Suite 900
New Orleans, LA 70130
sarah@pelicaninstitute.org
Ph: 5049528016
Party name: Pelican Institute for Public Policy


Kimberly Stewart Hermann
Counsel of Record
Southeastern Legal Foundation
560 W. Crossville Rd.
Suite 104
Roswell, GA 30075-7509
khermann@southeasternlegal.org
Ph: 770-977-2131
Party name: Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation


Ilya Shapiro
Counsel of Record
Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
ishapiro@cato.org
Ph: 2028420200
Party name: The Cato Institute

 

Opinions
Filing & Rules
Oral Arguments
Case Documents
News Media
About
Visit
Contact Us | Site Map | Help | Fellows Program | Jobs | Links | Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543