SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 18A65
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 18A65
Title:
United States, et al., Applicants
v.
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Docketed:
July 17, 2018
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Numbers:
(18-71928)
Proceedings and Orders
Jul 17 2018
Application (18A65) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Proof of Service
Main Document
Jul 18 2018
Response to application (18A65) requested by Justice Kennedy, due Monday, July 23, by noon ET.
Jul 23 2018
Letter of applicants United States, et al. received.
Jul 23 2018
Response to application from respondents Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. filed.
Main Document
Jul 24 2018
Reply of applicants United States, et al. filed.
Proof of Service
Main Document
Jul 30 2018
Application (18A65) referred to the Court.
Jul 30 2018
Application (18A65) denied by the Court. The Government’s request for relief is premature and is denied without prejudice. The breadth of respondents’ claims is striking, however, and the justiciability of those claims presents substantial grounds for difference of opinion. The District Court should take these concerns into account in assessing the burdens of discovery and trial, as well as the desirability of a prompt ruling on the Government’s pending dispositive motions.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Noel J. Francisco
Counsel of Record
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov
Ph: (202) 514-2217
Party name: USA, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents
Julia Ann Olson
Counsel of Record
Wild Earth Advocates
1216 Lincoln Street
Eugene, OR 97401
juliaaolson@gmail.com
Ph: 415 786 4825
Party name: Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##