SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 18-9383
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 18-9383
Title:
Lakshmi Arunachalam, Petitioner
v.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al.
Docketed:
May 22, 2019
Linked with:
18A858
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Numbers:
(18-72569)
Decision Date:
December 18, 2018
Proceedings and Orders
Feb 11 2019
Application (18A858) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 18, 2019 to May 17, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main Document
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Proof of Service
Feb 25 2019
Application (18A858) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 17, 2019.
May 17 2019
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Appendix
Petition
Proof of Service
Jun 21 2019
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
Main Document
Jul 05 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
Oct 07 2019
Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. §1, and since the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court." Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Alito, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Oct 22 2019
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document
Proof of Service
Nov 06 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
Dec 09 2019
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Lakshmi Arunachalam
222 Stanford Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Ph: (650) 690-0995
Party name: Lakshmi Arunachalam
Attorneys for Respondents
Noel John Francisco
Counsel of Record
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SUPREMECTBRIEFS!USDOJ.GOV
Ph: 202-514-2217
Party name: UNITED STATES
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##