SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
Docket for 17A440 *** CAPITAL CASE ***
Search documents in this case:
Search
No. 17A440 *** CAPITAL CASE ***
Title:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Applicants
v.
Torrey Twane McNabb
Docketed:
October 18, 2017
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Numbers:
(17-14612)
Proceedings and Orders
Oct 18 2017
Application (17A440) to vacate injunction, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Oct 19 2017
Response to application from respondent McNabb, Torrey T. filed.
Oct 19 2017
Reply of applicants Dunn, Comm'r, AL DOC, et al. filed.
Oct 19 2017
Application (17A440) referred to the Court.
Oct 19 2017
Application (17A440) granted by the Court. The application to vacate the injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama on October 16, 2017, presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court, is granted. “[I]nmates seeking time to challenge the manner in which the State plans to execute them must satisfy all of the requirements for a stay, including a showing of a significant possibility of success on the merits.” Hill v. McDonough, 547 U. S. 573, 584 (2006). The All Writs Act does not excuse a court from making these findings. Because the District Court enjoined Respondent’s execution without finding that he has a significant possibility of success on the merits, it abused its discretion. We accordingly vacate the injunction. Justice Breyer and Justice Sotomayor would deny the application to vacate the injunction.
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Thomas R. Govan, Jr.
Counsel of Record
501 Washington Avenue
P.O. Box 300152
Montgomery, AL 36130-0152
Ph: (334)-242-7300
Party name: Dunn, Comm'r, AL DOC, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents
John Anthony Palombi
Counsel of Record
817 South Court Street
Montgomery, AL 36104
John_Palombi@fd.org
Ph: 334-834-2099
Party name: McNabb, Torrey T.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##