SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
100+ items found for your search:
tinker
Page: 1 of 15
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QPReport
CERT. GRANTED 1/8/2021 QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether
Tinker
v. Des Moines Independent Community School
Order List (05/27/2025)
(ORDER LIST: 605 U.S.) TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2025 CERTIORARI --SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS 23-7541 BARNES, TOMMY D. V. FELIX, ROBERTO, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
Dates of Early Supreme Court Decisions and Arguments
DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS UNITED STATES REPORTS VOLUMES 2 – 107 (1791 – 1882) The dates of decisions do not appear beneath the case name in the first 107 volumes of the U.S.
25-906 E. D. v. Noblesville School District (06/15/2026)
so,the panel began by asking “whether
Tinker
v. Des Moines Independent Community School District of review for school censorship.In
Tinker
, the Court addressed a school policy restrictingstudents’
20-255 Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L. (06/23/2021)
the judgment, but the panel majority reasonedthat
Tinker
did not apply because schools had no expression in this case. Pp. 4–11.(a) In
Tinker
, we indicated that schools have a special interest
594us1r54_k5gm.pdf
judgment, but the panel majority reasoned that
Tinker
did not apply because schools had no special in this case. Pp. 187–193. (a) In
Tinker
, we indicated that schools have a special interest in
605us1pp_ord.pdf
PRELIMINARY PRINT—ORDERS Volume 605 U. S. Part 1 Pages 901–1007 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 1 Through June 11, 2025 REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions Page Proof Pending
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##