Search Results:

 QPReport
Amendments permit a state to abolish the insanity defense? LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 106,981

 QuestionsReport
to withdraw his not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity plea, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted counsel was required to proceed with an affirmative insanity defense because it was the only defense

 18-6135 Kahler v. Kansas (03/23/2020)
does not require Kansas to adopt an insanity test thatturns on a defendant’s ability to recognize adopted shows that no single version of the insanity defense has become so ingrained in American law

 22-721 McElrath v. Georgia (02/21/2024)
McElrath was not guilty by reason of insanity with respect to the malice-murder charge. That verdict jury’s verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity here constituted such a determination, and it is

 601us1r05_1qm2.pdf
McElrath was not guilty by reason of insanity with respect to the malice-murder charge. That verdict jury's verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity here constituted such a determination, and it is

 Order List (11-26-12)
(ORDER LIST: 568 U.S.) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2012 CERTIORARI --SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS 11-438 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, ET AL. V. GEITHNER, SEC. OF TREASURY The petition for rehearing is granted. The order

 17-7505 Madison v. Alabama (02/27/2019)
did not prove asubstantial threshold showing of insanity[ ]”—does not provide any assurance that the