Search Results:

 581bv.pdf

 19-16 Peithman v. United States (11/18/2019)
id., at 10 (“[T]he government has agreed that Honeycutt’s reasoningapplies to Section 981(a)(1)(C the Government now concedes that the rationale of Honeycutt applies equally to §981(a)(1)(C) as it

 QPReport
16-142 HONEYCUTT V. UNITED STATES DECISION BELOW: 816 F2d 362 CERT. GRANTED 12/9/2016 QUESTION

 Miscellaneous Order (12/09/2016)
U.S.) FRIDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2016 CERTIORARI GRANTED 16-142 HONEYCUTT, TERRY M. V. UNITED STATES The

 Day Call, Wednesday, March 29, 2017
D. C. No. 16-142. (5) TERRY MICHAEL HONEYCUTT, Petitioner V. 1 hour for argument. MR. BRIAN H

 Granted & Noted List October Term 2016 (As of June 26, 2017)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GRANTED & NOTED LIST CASES FOR ARGUMENT IN OCTOBER TERM 2016 As of June 26, 2017 14-1055* CFX LIGHTFOOT V. CENDANT MORTGAGE CORP. Court: USCA-9 Granted: 6/28/16

 Monthly Argument Calendar March 2017
STATES (Consolidated – 1 hr. for argument) (5)HONEYCUTT V. UNITED STATES Court convenes at 10 a.m.