Search Results:

 18-5181 Reynolds v. Florida (11-13-2018)
erred in its application of this Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In Hurst, this Court concluded that Florida’s death penalty scheme violated the Constitution because

 Gary Ray Bowles v. Florida, et al. (08/22/2019)
rule is at odds with another Florida rule requiring counsel raising an intellectual-disability claim appropriate case, however, I would be prepared to revisit a challenge to Florida’s procedural rule.

 Special Master Reports Web Site: Original No. 142
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on Florida v. Georgia, No. 142 Original Certificate of Service - Georgia's Responses to Florida's First Request for Production

 23A366 Griffin v. HM Florida-Orl, LLC (11/16/2023)
nothing about our view on whether Florida’s new law violates the First Amendment. Rather, for purposes of its stay application, Florida challenges only the scope of relief ordered by

 23-5171 Cunningham v. Florida (05/28/2024)
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NATOYA CUNNINGHAM v. FLORIDA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT No. 23–5171. Decided May 28, 2024 The

 142, Orig. Florida v. Georgia (04/01/2021)
its fisheries, rather than reduced river flows, caused the decline. Florida’s own documents and witnesses reveal that Florida allowed unprecedented levels of oyster harvesting in

 21-53 Holcombe v. Florida (02/28/2022)
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JAMES DALE HOLCOMBE v. FLORIDA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT No. 21–53. Decided February 28, 2022 The