Search Results:

 QPReport
traditional, bilateral form. While California courts follow Concepcion and Epic when a party to an 327 P.3d 129 (Cal. 2014). As a result, Concepcion and Epic have not caused bilateral arbitration to

 QPReport
20-1650 CONCEPCION V. UNITED STATES DECISION BELOW: 991 F.3d 279 CERT. GRANTED 9/30/2021 QUESTION

 QuestionsReport
09-893 AT&T MOBILITY LLC V. CONCEPCION DECISION BELOW: 584 F.3d 849 CERT. GRANTED 5/24/2010 QUESTION

 597us2r61_7khn.pdf
provision and other enhancements increased Concepcion's Sentencing Guidelines range from 57 to 71 months to 262 to 327 months. Because Concepcion was sentenced as a career offender, he was not

 20-1650 Concepcion v. United States (06/27/2022)
72a. The District Court did not address Concepcion’s evidence of rehabilitation or the Government’s countervailing evidence of Concepcion’s disciplinary record. The Court of Appeals

 QPReport
with other contracts?" AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339 (2011). LOWER COURT CASE

 Day Call, Wednesday, January 19, 2022
Washington, D. C. No. 20-1650. (4) CARLOS CONCEPCION, Petitioner V. 1 hour for argument. MR. MATTHEW