Search Results:

 QPReport
CONVICTIONS MUST BE SET ASIDE UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).” CONSOLIDATED WITH 15-1504 FOR ONE

 QPReport
CONVICTIONS MUST BE SET ASIDE UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).” CONSOLIDATED WITH 15-1503 FOR ONE

 QuestionsReport
courts refused to consider petitioner’s claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), on the ground that the

 QPReport
the disclosure of informant information in compliance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) made in the

 QuestionsReport
evidence, violating John Thompson's rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). Despite no history of

 QPReport
consideration of Mr. Trevino's argument under Martinez v. Ryan? 2. Mr. Trevino raised a claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), that the trial prosecutor

 22-5058 Chinn v. Shoop (11/07/22)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAVEL CHINN v. TIM SHOOP, WARDEN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF This is a capital case involving a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963). There is no dispute