Search Results:

 21A471 Wisconsin Legislature v. Wisconsin Elections Comm’n (03/23/2022)
and the Governor turned to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which had already agreed to hear an original action brought of equal protection and the VRA. We accordingly

 10-238-3.pdf
increased 80o/o in receipts over the 2004 presidential election, totaling more than $1.8 billion.The Republican presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain (AZ), received $84.1

 24-621 National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n (06/30/2026)
Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF abridging the freedom of speech.” This Court has determined that political parties—as well as candidates, private individuals, and outside groups—may

 21-12 Federal Election Comm'n v. Ted Cruz For Senate (05/16/2022)
Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION for appellees’ injuries because the Committee had a

 Contact Us - Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court at Work The Supreme Court Building Please note the Supreme Court does not have a public comment phone line. Contact the Public Information Office by U.S. Mail:

 607us1r05_e2q3.pdf
will be outcome determinative. Yet the Court has repeatedly emphasized that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election. Such

 20a66wdiff_20e4.pdf
the election, in contravention of this Court’s precedents. This Court has repeatedly emphasized that federal courts ordinarily should not alter state election laws