Search Results:

 24-109 Louisiana v. Callais (04/29/2026)
the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Together with No. 24–110, Robinson et al. v. Callais et al., on appeal from the same court. 2 LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS Syllabus

 24-109 Louisiana v. Callais (06/27/2025)
doing so, I would make clear that where 2 LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS THOMAS, J., dissenting this Court’s interpretation of

 25A1197 Callais v. Louisiana (05/04/2026)
map is an unconstitutional gerrymander, see Louisiana v. Callais, 608 U. S. ___ (2026)—some Louisiana voters had already mailed back their filled-in

 23A994 Robinson v. Callais (05/15/2024)
seriesof cases about what district lines Louisiana voters should use to select their Congressional Representatives. Over 2 ROBINSON v. CALLAIS JACKSON, J., dissenting more than two

 Home - Supreme Court of the United States
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on Louisiana v. Callais (24-109 C. §10301 et seq., did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no District of Columbia v. R.W. (25-248

 21A539 Louisiana v. American Rivers (04/06/2022)
because they have failed to substan2 LOUISIANA v. AMERICAN RIVERS KAGAN, J., dissenting tiate their normal order is justified only“rarely.” Heckler v. Lopez, 463 U. S. 1328, 1330 (1983) (Rehnquist, J

 Miscellaneous Order (05/06/2026)
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES 24-10924-110 ) ) ) LOUISIANA V. CALLAIS, PHILLIP, ET AL. ROBINSON, PRESS, ET AL. V. CALLAIS, PHILLIP, ET AL. The motion of Press Robinson, et