SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
500+ items found for your search:
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
Page: 1 of 72
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QPReport
18-1195
ESPINOZA
V
.
MONTANA
DEPARTMENT
OF
REVENUE
DECISION BELOW: 393 Mont. 446 CERT. GRANTED
Day Call, Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Va. (20 minutes – for petitioners) KENDRA
ESPINOZA
, ET MR. ADAM G. UNIKOWSKY Washington, D. C.
MONTANA
DEPARTMENT
OF (30 minutes – for respondents)
REVENUE
, ET AL.
Oral Argument Calendar January 2020
USA 18-882 Wednesday, January 15 (5)BABB
V
. WILKIE, SEC. OF VA 18-1195 Wednesday, January 22 (3)
ESPINOZA
V
.
MONTANA
DEPT. OF
REVENUE
Court convenes at 10 a.m. November 8, 2019
QPReport
20-1088 CARSON
V
. MAKIN DECISION BELOW: 979 F.3d 21 CERT. GRANTED 7/2/2021 QUESTION PRESENTED: In
Espinoza
v
.
Montana
Department
of
Revenue
, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (2020), this Court held
18-1195 Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue (06/30/2020)
that triggers the most exacting scrutiny.” 2
ESPINOZA
v
.
MONTANA
DEPT. OF
REVENUE
Syllabus Id., at ___. Here, the application of
Montana’s
no-aid provision excludes religious schools from
Home - Supreme Court of the United States
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary Today at the Court - Monday, Aug 24, 2026 this program describes a May 3, 1912, Freshman
v
. Sophomore debate on the topic of statewide
Hearing List January 2020
January 22, 2020 No. 18–1195. Kendra
Espinoza
, et al.
v
.
Montana
Department
of
Revenue
, et al. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of
Montana
. For petitioners: Richard D. Komer, Arlington, Va
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##