SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
Original Jurisdiction Records & Briefs
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
VISIT
Hours & Directions
Prohibited Items
Visitor Guidelines
Accessibility
Maps & Guides
Courtroom Lectures
Exhibitions
Group Visits
Activities for Students & Families
Café & Building Amenities
Home
>
Search Results
500+ items found for your search:
state eminent domain cases
Page: 1 of 72
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QPReport
the authority to exercise the federal government's
eminent
domain
power to condemn land in which a
state
claims an interest. LOWER COURT
CASE
NUMBER: 19-1191, 19-1232
QPReport
2. Whether a§ 1498(a) action for the
eminent
domain
taking of a patent license by the government is a suit for patent "infringement" under the AIA. LOWER COURT
CASE
NUMBER: 2016-1502
Home - Supreme Court of the United States
Acme Newspictures, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United
States
this era to have their own carrying
cases
. Justice Frankfurter’s monogrammed leather
case
features a lockable clasp and handle
19-1039 PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (06/29/2021)
The Court later confirmed that federal
eminent
domain
extended to property within a
State
. Kohl v. United
States
, 91
594us2r62_19m1.pdf
The Court later confrmed that federal
eminent
domain
extended to property within a
State
. Kohl v. United
States
, 91
20-1214 Eychaner v. Chicago (07/02/2021)
later, the city planned to invoke its
eminent
domain
power to transfer Eychaner’s property to the company
20-603 Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety (06/29/2022)
immunity. The trial court denied the
State’s
motion upon entering the federal system, the
States
implicitly agreed their “
eminent
domain
power would yield to that of theFederal
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##