Search Results:

 QPReport
142 Orig FLORIDA V. GEORGIA DECISION BELOW: LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: QUESTION PRESENTED: EXCEPTIONS to the Apalachicola Bay and River; (ii) Georgia’s continued increase in consumption of the waters at

 142, Orig. Florida v. Georgia (04/01/2021)
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FLORIDA v. GEORGIA ON EXCEPTIONS TO SECOND REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER No of Florida’s fisheries, not that Georgia’s overconsumption caused the increased salinity and

 142 Orig Florida v. Georgia (06/27/2018)
several related but more specific 2 FLORIDA v. GEORGIA Syllabus sets of principles guide the Court’s review. First, both Georgia and Florida possess “an equal right to make

 Special Master Reports Web Site: Original No. 142
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on Florida v. Georgia, No. 142 Original Certificate of Service - Florida's Responses to Georgia's First Request for Production

 QuestionsReport
is at its highest in the death penalty setting.”). 5. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 200 n.50 (1976)(opinion of

 Granted & Noted List OT23 (Final List - Revised 6/5/25)
AND REMANDED – Opinion also for NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, No. 22-555 -Vacated and Remanded. 22-324 * CFX O’CONNOR-RATCLIFF V. GARNIER Court: USCA-9 Granted: 4/24/23 Argument Date

 Granted & Noted List - October Term 2017
142, Orig.                   FLORIDA V. GEORGIA 16-111             CSX    MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD. V. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMM N 16-307)3          CFX     NLRB V. MURPHY OIL USA