Search Results:

 21-499 Vega v. Tekoh (06/23/2022)
Vega did not informTekoh of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436. Tekoh eventually provided a U. S. ____ (2022) 3 Syllabus restrict Miranda’s application

 QPReport
21-499 VEGA V. TEKOH DECISION BELOW: 985 F.3d 713 CERT. GRANTED 1/14/2022 QUESTION PRESENTED: In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), this Court announced a

 QPReport
COUNSEL DURING CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION, CONFLICTS WITH MIRANDA v. ARIZONA AND DECISIONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE

 QPReport
18-1109 McKINNEY V. ARIZONA DECISION BELOW: 426 P.3d 1204 CERT. GRANTED 6/10/2019 QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court was required to apply current law

 Home - Supreme Court of the United States
The Justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. arguments, with attorneys for each side of a case given 30 minutes to make a presentation to the

 Order List (10/31/2016)
340 U. S. 36 (1950). 15-8842 PURCELL, BOBBY C. V. ARIZONA 15-8878 NAJAR, WILLIAM F. V. ARIZONA 15-9044 ARIAS, JONATHAN A. V. ARIZONA 15-9057 DeSHAW, SCOTT L. V. ARIZONA

 25-748 McCarthy v. Hernandez (06/22/2026)
questioning him there without first administering a Miranda warning, see Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), and Hernandez, a man