Search Results:

 597us1r55_8m58.pdf
Vega did not inform Tekoh of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436. Tekoh eventually provided a

 QPReport
21-499 VEGA V. TEKOH DECISION BELOW: 985 F.3d 713 CERT. GRANTED 1/14/2022 QUESTION PRESENTED: In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), this Court announced a

 602us1r44_kjfm.pdf
Publication OCTOBER TERM, 2023 779 Syllabus SMITH v. ARIZONA certiorari to the court of appeals of arizona, division one No. 22–899. Argued January 10, 2024—Decided

 598us1pp_ord.pdf
for further consideration in light of Xiulu Ruan v. United States, 597 U. S. 450 (2022). Certiorari Dismissed No. 21–7740. Peters v. Texas Children’s Hospital et al. C. A. 5th

 QPReport
COUNSEL DURING CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION, CONFLICTS WITH MIRANDA v. ARIZONA AND DECISIONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE

 18-1109 McKinney v. Arizona (02/25/2020)
STATES No. 18–1109 JAMES ERIN MCKINNEY, PETITIONER v. ARIZONA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA [February 25, 2020] JUSTICE KAVANAUGH delivered the opinion of the

 17-251 Hidalgo v. Arizona (03/19/2018)
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA No. 17–251. Decided March 19, 2018 The petition for a