Supreme Court of the United States

Quick Links


Electronic Filing

Visit
 

Fellows Program

Contact Us
Live Audio
Live Audio

Today at the Court - Friday, Jun 14, 2024

  • The Court will convene for a public non-argument session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m.
  • The Court may announce opinions, which are posted on the homepage after announcement from the Bench.
  • Seating for the non-argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The Supreme Court Building will otherwise be closed to the public.
  • The Court will release an order list  at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, June 17.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<June 2024><<
June 2024
SMTWTFS
      1
2345
 
78
9101112
 
1415
161718
 
 
2122
23242526272829
30      
Calendar Info/Key

 



Recent Decisions


June 14, 2024
         
United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC (22-1238)
Prospective parity—i.e., requiring equal fees for otherwise identical Chapter 11 debtors going forward—is the appropriate remedy for the short-lived and small disparity created by the fee statute held unconstitutional in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 596 U. S. 464 (2022).

         
Campos-Chaves v. Garland (22-674)
Because each of the aliens in this case received a proper notice for the removal hearings they missed and at which they were ordered removed from the United States, see 8 U. S. C. §1229(a)(2), they cannot seek rescission of their in absentia removal orders on the basis of defective notice under §1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii).

         
Garland v. Cargill (22-976)
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a Rule that classifies a bump stock as a “machinegun” under 26 U. S. C. §5845(b).



June 13, 2024
         
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (23-235)
Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory actions regarding mifepristone.

         
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney (23-367)
When considering the National Labor Relations Board’s request for a preliminary injunction under §10( j) of the National Labor Relations Act, district courts must apply the traditional four factors articulated in Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U. S. 7 (2008).

         
Vidal v. Elster (22-704)
The Lanham Act’s names clause—which prohibits the registration of a mark that “[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . . identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent,” 15 U. S. C. §1052(c)—does not violate the First Amendment.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

Foul Ball


On June 17, 1967, Chief Justice Earl Warren, an avid baseball fan, attended a game at RFK Stadium in Washington, D.C. The Washington Senators played the Boston Red Sox, who ultimately won the game. Also in attendance were spectators Clem Galligan and his 8-year-old son, John, seated within eyesight of the Chief Justice. Much to their delight, a foul ball landed on John’s seat. After the game, his father asked the Chief Justice to autograph the ball, which he graciously did. Despite some fading to the signature, the signed baseball remained a family treasure until donated to the Supreme Court in 2021.

 

1 / 2
Foul ball signed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, June 17, 1967.
Foul ball signed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, June 17, 1967.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
2 / 2
1960s Washington Senators pennant, donated by the Galligan family, 2021.
1960s Washington Senators pennant, donated by the Galligan family, 2021.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the first photograph.
Opinions
Filing & Rules
Oral Arguments
Case Documents
News Media
About the Court
Contact Us | Site Map | Help | Fellows Program | Jobs | Links | Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543