Supreme Court of the United States
Skip Navigation LinksHome > Search Results

Docket for 14-824
No. 14-824
Vide 14-8106
Raymond Curtis Carp, Petitioner
Docketed:January 13, 2015
Lower Ct:Supreme Court of Michigan
  Case Nos.:(146478)
  Decision Date:July 8, 2014
  Rehearing Denied:October 22, 2014

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jan 9 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)
Feb 10 2015 Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.
Feb 18 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 6, 2015.
Feb 20 2015 Response Requested . (Due March 23, 2015)
Mar 23 2015 Brief of respondent Michigan in opposition filed.
Mar 31 2015 Reply of petitioner Raymond Curtis Carp filed.
Apr 8 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.
Apr 27 2015 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.
Feb 8 2016 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.
Feb 29 2016 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2016.
Mar 7 2016 Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner�s asserted entitlement to retroactive relief �is properly presented in the case.� Id., at ___ (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court�s disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner�s entitlement to relief. The Court�s disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner�s sentence actually qualifies as a mandatory life without parole sentence.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Patricia L. Selby Selby Law Firm, PLLC(734) 624-4113
P.O. Box 1077
Grosse Ile, MI  43138
Party name: Raymond Curtis Carp
Attorneys for Respondent:
Hilary B. Georgia Assistant Prosecuting Attorney(810) 985-2474
    Counsel of Record St. Clair County Prosecutor's Office
201 McMorran Blvd.
Room. 3300
Port Huron, MI  48060
Party name: Michigan


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543