Today at the Court - Monday, Feb 6, 2023


  • The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
  • Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<February 2023><<
February 2023
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19
 
2122232425
262728    
       
Calendar Info/Key

 



Recent Decisions


January 23, 2023
         
In re Grand Jury (21-1397) (Per Curiam)
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

         
Arellano v. McDonough (21-432)
The effective date of an award of service-related disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military determined pursuant to 38 U. S. C. ยงยง5110(a)(1) and 5110(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

The Tycoon Tea Battle


In 1881, Corbin, May & Company filed for a trademark that included the word “Tycoon” prominently displayed, claiming the word uniquely identified their imported teas. W.J. Gould & Company, a competing tea importer, also used “Tycoon” to describe their teas. Corbin sought an injunction in the lower courts to force Gould to cease using the word “Tycoon” and asked for damages for lost revenue. The lower court dismissed the claims by Corbin without a written opinion and the case, Corbin  v. Gould, came to the Supreme Court on appeal.

On February 3, 1890, the Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal holding that “Tycoon” had long been used as a description of certain teas imported from Japan. Relying on the original labels provided by Corbin, the Court found insufficient similarity between them to warrant a finding of trademark infringement.

 

Tea labels submitted as part of the Transcripts of Records in Corbin v. Gould.
Tea labels submitted as part of the Transcripts of Records in Corbin  v. Gould.
Records & Briefs Collection, Supreme Court of the United States


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543