Supreme Court of the United States

Today at the Court - Monday, Mar 27, 2023


  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.

  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day. 

  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed.


Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<March 2023><<
March 2023
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
       
Calendar Info/Key

 


Oral Arguments

Week of Monday, March 27


Monday, March 27
       
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (21-757)
       
United States v. Hansen (22-179)




Tuesday, March 28
       
Smith v. United States (21-1576)
       
Lora v. United States (22-49)


Wednesday, March 29
       
Samia v. United States (22-196)
       
Karcho Polselli v. IRS (21-1599)

 

The audio recordings and transcripts of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review.


Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

Recent Decisions


March 21, 2023
         
Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools (21-887)
An Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for the denial of a free and appropriate education may proceed without exhausting the administrative processes of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U. S. C. §1415(l), because the remedy sought is not one IDEA provides.



February 28, 2023
         
Delaware v. Pennsylvania (145, Orig.)
Recommendations in the Special Master’s First Interim Report concluding that the escheatment of certain financial instruments relevant to this case should follow the Federal Disposition Act are adopted to the extent they are consistent with the Court’s opinion, and Delaware’s objections are overruled.

         
Bittner v. United States (21-1195)
The Bank Secrecy Act’s $10,000 maximum penalty for the nonwillful failure to file a compliant report accrues on a per-report, not a per-account, basis.



February 22, 2023
         
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley (21-908)
Pursuant to §523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor like Kate Bartenwerfer who is liable for her partner’s fraud cannot discharge that debt in bankruptcy, regardless of her own culpability.

         
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt (21-984)
Respondent Hewitt was not an executive exempt from the FLSA’s overtime pay guarantee; daily-rate workers, of whatever income level, qualify as paid on a salary basis only if the conditions set out in 29 CFR §541.604(b) are met.

         
Cruz v. Arizona (21-846)
The Arizona Supreme Court’s holding below—that Lynch v. Arizona, 578 U. S. 613, did not represent a “significant change in the law” for purposes of permitting Cruz to file a successive petition for state postconviction relief under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(g)—is not an adequate state-law ground supporting that judgment.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

Before They Were Justices


Stanley F. Reed was born on December 31, 1884 in Minerva, Kentucky. At the age of 18, he graduated from Kentucky Wesleyan College and later attended Yale University where he earned a second bachelor’s degree in 1906. Although Reed attended law school at the University of Virginia, Columbia, and the Sorbonne in France, he never earned a law degree. Instead, he returned home where he read law and was admitted to the Kentucky bar.

Reed began practicing law in 1910, and served four years in the Kentucky General Assembly before joining the Army in WWI. After his service, he resumed private practice until 1929, when he was appointed as general counsel for the Federal Farm Board. Reed successfully argued before the Supreme Court in 1935 as special assistant to the Attorney General in the Gold Clause Case.

On March 25, 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed him Solicitor General of the United States. Three years later, Roosevelt nominated Reed to the Supreme Court. Serving for 19 years, Justice Reed retired from the Court in 1957. Justice Reed died on April 2, 1980 at the age of 95.

 

1 / 2
Ugo Carusi (right), executive assistant to Attorney General Homer Cummings, administers the oath of office to Stanley F. Reed (center) on March 25, 1935.  Attorney General Cummings looks on as he holds Reed’s commission.  As Solicitor General from March 1935 to January 1938, Reed once argued six cases during a two-week period.
Ugo Carusi (right), executive assistant to Attorney General Homer Cummings, administers the oath of office to Stanley F. Reed (center) on March 25, 1935. Attorney General Cummings looks on as he holds Reed’s commission. As Solicitor General from March 1935 to January 1938, Reed once argued six cases during a two-week period.
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
2 / 2
Solicitor General Stanley F. Reed, 1935.  Only five members of the Supreme Court—William Howard Taft, Stanley F. Reed, Robert H. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall, and Elena Kagan—have served as Solicitor General prior to their appointment to the Court.  Three of them—Reed, Marshall, and Kagan—were appointed to the Court while serving in this role.
Solicitor General Stanley F. Reed, 1935. Only five members of the Supreme Court—William Howard Taft, Stanley F. Reed, Robert H. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall, and Elena Kagan—have served as Solicitor General prior to their appointment to the Court. Three of them—Reed, Marshall, and Kagan—were appointed to the Court while serving in this role.
Photograph by Bachrach Studio, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Click on the arrows or dots to see the first photograph.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543