Search Results:

 QPReport
Court declines to recuse himself in a capital case where he had personally approved the decision to pursue capital punishment against Petitioner in his prior capacity as

 QuestionsReport
justice system.”4 A system which includes capital punishment but does not provide a meaningful opportunity

 17-8151 Bucklew v. Precythe (04/01/2019)
forbids “cruel and unusual” methods of capital punishment but does not guarantee a prisoner a When it comes to determining whether a punishment is unconstitutionally cruel because of the pain

 Order List (03/19/2018)
(ORDER LIST: 583 U.S.) MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES 17A838 TIMBES, PAMELA M. V. DEUTSCHE BANK, ET AL. The application for stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the

 22-6057 Clark v. Mississippi (06/30/2023)
the jury was deliberating about appropriate punishment, it had trouble reaching consensus. On the statingthey were “‘unable to agree unanimously on punishment’” and asking what would happen if they

 597us1r56_p86b.pdf
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 597 U. S. Part 1 Pages 159–178 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 23, 2022 REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions Page Proof Pending Publication NOTICE: This

 17-1284 Apodaca v. Raemisch (10/09/2018)
SOTOMAYOR respecting the denialof certiorari. A punishment need not leave physical scars to be to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Respondents, CDOC Executive Director Rick Raemisch and