No. 24A1122
Title:U.S. Doge Service, et al., Applicants
v.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Docketed:May 21, 2025
Linked with 2
Lower Ct:United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
   Case Numbers:(25-5130)
   Decision Date:
   Rehearing Denied:
  Discretionary Court Decision Date:

DateProceedings and Orders
May 21 2025Application (24A1122) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentLower Court Orders/OpinionsProof of Service
May 21 2025Response to application (24A1122) requested by The Chief Justice, due by Noon (EDT), on May 23, 2025.
May 23 2025Response to application from respondent Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed.
Main DocumentMain DocumentProof of Service
May 23 2025Order entered by The Chief Justice: Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants and the response filed thereto, it is ordered that the April 15, 2025, and May 20, 2025 orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 25-cv-511, are hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court.
May 23 2025Brief amicus curiae of Government Transparency Scholars filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
May 23 2025Brief amicus curiae of American Oversight filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
May 24 2025Reply of applicant U.S. Doge Service, et al. filed.
ReplyProof of Service
Jun 06 2025Application (24A1122) referred to the Court.
Jun 06 2025The application for a stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted. Additionally, applicants suggested this Court treat the application as a petition for a writ of certiorari; doing so, the petition is granted (case No. 24-1246). The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s order denying a writ of mandamus is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this order. Cf. In re United States, 583 U. S. 29 (2017) (per curiam). The portions of the District Court’s April 15 discovery order that require the Government to disclose the content of intra–Executive Branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored. Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity’s ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications. Cf. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D. C., 542 U. S. 367, 385 (2004) (“[S]pecial considerations control when the Executive Branch’s interests in maintaining the autonomy of its office and safeguarding the confidentiality of its communications are implicated.”). On remand of the case, the Court of Appeals should take appropriate action to narrow the April 15 discovery order consistent with this order. The April 15, 2025, and May 20, 2025, orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 25-cv-511, are stayed pending remanded consideration at the Court of Appeals, and disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson would deny the application.

NAMEADDRESSPHONE
Attorneys for Petitioners
D. John Sauer
    Counsel of Record
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D 20530-0001

SUPREMECTBRIEFS@USDOJ.GOV
202-514-2217
Party name: In Re U.S. Doge Service, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent
Nikhel Suresh Sus
    Counsel of Record
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington
P.O. Box 14596
Washington, DC 20044

nsus@citizensforethics.org
(202) 408-5565
Party name: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Other
Ronald Andrew FeinAmerican Oversight
1030 15th St. NW #B255
Washington, DC 20005

ron.fein@americanoversight.org
2028695241
Party name: American Oversight
Elizabeth Haddix
    Counsel of Record
American Oversight
1030 15th Street NW, B255
Washington, DC 20005

elizabeth.haddix@americanoversight.org
202-869-5241
Party name: American Oversight
Bruce V. Spiva
    Counsel of Record
Campaign Legal Center
1101 14th St. NW., Ste. 400
Washington, DC 20005

bspiva@campaignlegalcenter.org
202-253-4868
Party name: Government Transparency Scholars