| No. 23A1002 |
|
| Title: |
Nancy Landry, Secretary of State of Louisiana, et al., Applicants v. Phillip Callais, et al. |
| Docketed: | May 10, 2024 |
| Lower Ct: | United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Case Numbers: | (3:24-cv-00122) |
| May 10 2024 | Application (23A1002) for a stay, submitted to Justice Alito. Main Document Other Other Proof of Service |
| May 10 2024 | Response to application (23A1002) requested by Justice Alito, due by 11 a.m. (EDT), on May 13, 2024. |
| May 10 2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Edward Galmon, Sr., Cierra Hart, Norris Henderson, and Tramelle Howard filed. Main Document Proof of Service |
| May 13 2024 | Response to application from applicant Phillip Callais, et al., filed [at 11:38 AM]. Proof of Service Main Document |
| May 14 2024 | Reply of applicant Nancy Landry, et al. filed. Reply Proof of Service |
| May 14 2024 | Respondents' Request for Sur-Reply of PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., not accepted for filing. (May 14, 2024) |
| May 14 2024 | Respondents' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply filed by respondent Phillip Callais, et al. Main Document |
| May 14 2024 | Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply denied by Justice Alito. |
| May 15 2024 | Application (23A1002) referred to the Court. |
| May 15 2024 | Application (23A1002) for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. See Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U. S. 1 (2006). The April 30, 2024 order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, case No. 3:24–cv–00122, is stayed pending the timely docketing of the appeal in this Court. Should the jurisdictional statement be timely filed, this order shall remain in effect pending this Court’s action on the appeal. If the appeal is dismissed, or the judgment affirmed, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event jurisdiction is noted or postponed, this order will remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan would deny the application for stay. Justice Jackson dissents. (Detached Opinion) |