| No. 23-60 |
|
| Title: |
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Feds for Medical Freedom, et al. |
| Docketed: | July 21, 2023 |
| Linked with: | 22A1066 |
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
| Case Numbers: | (22-40043) |
| Decision Date: | March 23, 2023 |
| Jun 09 2023 | Application (22A1066) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 21, 2023 to July 21, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito. Main Document Proof of Service |
| Jun 09 2023 | Application (22A1066) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 21, 2023. |
| Jul 21 2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2023) Petition Proof of Service |
| Jul 25 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 21, 2023 to September 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. Main Document |
| Jul 26 2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 20, 2023. |
| Aug 23 2023 | Brief of respondents Feds for Medical Freedom, et al. in opposition filed. Main Document Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service |
| Sep 06 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023. |
| Sep 06 2023 | Reply of petitioners Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed) Main Document Proof of Service |
| Sep 18 2023 | Rescheduled. |
| Sep 20 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023. |
| Oct 10 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023. |
| Oct 23 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023. |
| Oct 30 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023. |
| Nov 06 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023. |
| Nov 13 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023. |
| Nov 27 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023. |
| Dec 01 2023 | Rescheduled. |
| Dec 01 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023. |
| Dec 11 2023 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to direct the District Court to vacate as moot its order granting a preliminary injunction. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). Justice Jackson, dissenting: In my view, the party seeking vacatur has not established equitable entitlement to that remedy. See Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, 601 U. S. ___ (2023) (Jackson, J., concurring in the judgment). |
| Jan 12 2024 | Judgment issued. Main Document |