| No. 20-1212 |
|
| Title: |
Peyman Pakdel, et ux., Petitioners v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
| Docketed: | March 3, 2021 |
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Case Numbers: | (17-17504) |
| Decision Date: | March 17, 2020 |
| Rehearing Denied: | October 13, 2020 |
| Feb 26 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021) |
| Mar 04 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al. |
| Mar 18 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Mar 23 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021. |
| Apr 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed. |
| Apr 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed. |
| Apr 02 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. |
| May 03 2021 | Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed. |
| May 14 2021 | Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| May 18 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021. |
| Jun 01 2021 | Rescheduled. |
| Jun 07 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021. |
| Jun 08 2021 | Rescheduled. |
| Jun 14 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021. |
| Jun 21 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021. |
| Jun 28 2021 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
| Jul 30 2021 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |