No. 19-8860
Title:In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam, Petitioner
Docketed:June 30, 2020
Lower Ct:
   Case Numbers:
   Decision Date:
   Rehearing Denied:
  Discretionary Court Decision Date:

DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 15 2020Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
Aug 13 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Oct 05 2020The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Oct 10 2020Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Oct 21 2020Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
Nov 09 2020Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

NAMEADDRESSPHONE
Attorneys for Petitioner
Lakshmi Arunachalam222 Stanford Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025

(650) 690-0995
Party name: In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam