No. 19-1280
 
Title: Idaho Department of Correction, et al., Petitioners
v.
Adree Edmo, aka Mason Edmo
Docketed: May 12, 2020
Linked with: 19A1038
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
   Case Numbers: (19-35017, 19-35019)
   Decision Date: August 23, 2019
   Rehearing Denied: February 10, 2020
 
Proceedings and Orders
May 06 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2020)
May 06 2020 Application (19A1038) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main Document Proof of Service
May 13 2020 Response to application (19A1038) requested by Justice Kagan, due Monday, May 18, by 4 p.m. ET
May 18 2020 Response to application from respondent Adree Edmo filed.
Main Document Proof of Service
May 21 2020 Reply of applicants Idaho Department of Correction, et al. filed.
Reply Proof of Service
May 21 2020 Application (19A1038) referred to the Court.
May 21 2020 Application (19A1038) denied by the Court. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the application.
May 29 2020 Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 11, 2020 to August 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jun 02 2020 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 10, 2020.
Aug 10 2020 Brief of respondent Adree Edmo in opposition filed.
Aug 24 2020 Reply of petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Aug 24 2020 Suggestion of mootness filed by petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. (Distributed)
Aug 26 2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Sep 03 2020 Response to suggestion of mootness from respondent Adree Edmo filed. (Distributed)
Sep 11 2020 Reply in support of suggestion of mootness filed by petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. (Distributed)
Oct 05 2020 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
Oct 13 2020 Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I would hold that the case is moot and direct that the decision below be vacated. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).
Attorneys
Attorneys for Petitioners
Brady James Hall
Counsel of Record
Moore Elia Kraft & Hall, LLP
702 West Idaho Street, Suite 800
Boise, ID 83702

brady@melawfirm.net
Ph: 208-336-6900
Party name: Idaho Department of Correction, et al.


Attorneys for Respondents
Lori Ellen Rifkin
Counsel of Record
Rifkin Law Office
2855 Telegraph Ave, Suite 517
Berkeley, CA 94705

lrifkin@rifkinlawoffice.com
Ph: 5104144132
Party name: Adree Edmo