No. 19-1280 |
|
Title: |
Idaho Department of Correction, et al., Petitioners v. Adree Edmo, aka Mason Edmo |
Docketed: | May 12, 2020 |
Linked with: | 19A1038 |
Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Case Numbers: | (19-35017, 19-35019) |
Decision Date: | August 23, 2019 |
Rehearing Denied: | February 10, 2020 |
May 06 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2020) |
May 06 2020 | Application (19A1038) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan. Main Document Proof of Service |
May 13 2020 | Response to application (19A1038) requested by Justice Kagan, due Monday, May 18, by 4 p.m. ET |
May 18 2020 | Response to application from respondent Adree Edmo filed. Main Document Proof of Service |
May 21 2020 | Reply of applicants Idaho Department of Correction, et al. filed. Reply Proof of Service |
May 21 2020 | Application (19A1038) referred to the Court. |
May 21 2020 | Application (19A1038) denied by the Court. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the application. |
May 29 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 11, 2020 to August 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jun 02 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 10, 2020. |
Aug 10 2020 | Brief of respondent Adree Edmo in opposition filed. |
Aug 24 2020 | Reply of petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Aug 24 2020 | Suggestion of mootness filed by petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. (Distributed) |
Aug 26 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
Sep 03 2020 | Response to suggestion of mootness from respondent Adree Edmo filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 11 2020 | Reply in support of suggestion of mootness filed by petitioners Idaho Department of Correction, et al. (Distributed) |
Oct 05 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020. |
Oct 13 2020 | Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I would hold that the case is moot and direct that the decision below be vacated. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). |