| No. 17A550 |
|
| Title: |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Hawaii, et al. |
| Docketed: | November 20, 2017 |
| Linked with: | 17-965 |
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Case Numbers: | (17-17168) |
| Nov 20 2017 | Application (17A550) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Proof of Service Main Document |
| Nov 21 2017 | Response to application due on or before 12 p.m., Tuesday, November 28, 2017. |
| Nov 22 2017 | Motion (17A550) for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by the State of Texas, et al. Main Document Other |
| Nov 28 2017 | Response to application from respondents Hawaii, et al. filed. Main Document |
| Nov 28 2017 | Motion (17A550) for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by the State of New York, et al. Main Document Proof of Service Certificate of Word Count |
| Nov 30 2017 | Reply of applicants Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. Proof of Service Reply |
| Dec 04 2017 | Application (17A550) referred to the Court. |
| Dec 04 2017 | Application (17A550) granted by the Court. The application for a stay presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s October 20, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.
In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch.
Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would deny the application. |